Skip to main content
Log in

Multivariable spatial prediction

  • Articles
  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For spatial prediction, it has been usual to predict one variable at a time, with the predictor using data from the same type of variable (kriging) or using additional data from auxiliary variables (cokriging). Optimal predictors can be expressed in terms of covariance functions or variograms. In earth science applications, it is often desirable to predict the joint spatial abundance of variables. A review of cokriging shows that a new cross-variogram allows optimal prediction without any symmetry condition on the covariance function. A bivariate model shows that cokriging with previously used cross-variograms can result in inferior prediction. The simultaneous spatial prediction of several variables, based on the new cross-variogram, is then developed. Multivariable spatial prediction yields the mean-squared prediction error matrix, and so allows the construction of multivariate prediction regions. Relationships between cross-variograms, between single-variable and multivariable spatial prediction, and between generalized least squares estimation and spatial prediction are also given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carr, J. R., and McCallister, P. G., 1985, An Application of Cokriging for Estimation of Tripartite Earthquake Response Spectra: Math. Geol., v. 17, p. 527–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, I., Basinger, K. L., and Harper, W. V., 1989, MUCK—A Novel Approach to Cokriging,in B. E. Buxton (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Geostatistical, Sensitivity, and Uncertainty Methods for Ground-Water Flow and Radionuclide Transport Modeling: Battelle Press, Columbus, p. 473–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N., 1991, Statistics for Spatial Data: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 900 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N., and Grondona, M. O., 1992, A Comparison of Variogram Estimation with Covariogram Estimation,in K. V. Mardia (Ed.), The Art of Statistical Science: John Wiley and Sons, New York, p. 191–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, A. S., 1962, Best Linear Unbiased Prediction in the Generalized Linear Regression Model: J. Am. Stat. Assoc., v. 57, p. 369–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, R. J., Clapp, R. B., Thomas, A. L., Hunley, A. E., Farrow, N. D., and Dearstone, K. C., 1989, Cokriging Model for Estimation of Water Table Elevation: Water Res. Res., v. 25, p. 429–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts, C., and Matheron, G., 1971, Universal Kriging (an Optimal Method for Estimating and Contouring in Trend Surface Analysis),in J. I. McGerrigle (Ed.), Proceedings of Ninth International Symposium on Techniques for Decision-Making in the Mineral Industry, Special Vol. 12: The Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, p. 159–169.

  • Journel, A. G., and Huijbregts, C. J., 1978, Mining Geostatistics: Academic Press, London, 600 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnus, J. R., and Neudecker, H., 1988, Matrix Differential Calculus with Applications in Statistics and Econometrics: John Wiley and Sons, New York, 393 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron, G., 1969, Le Krigeage Universel: Cahiers du Centre de Morphologie Mathematique, No. 1, Fontainebleau.

  • Matheron, G., 1971, The Theory of Regionalized Variables and Its Applications: Cahiers du Centre de Morphologie Mathematique, No. 5., Fontainebleau.

  • Mulla, D. J., 1988, Estimating Spatial Patterns in Water Content, Matric Suction, and Hydraulic Conductivity: Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., v. 52, p. 1547–1553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. E., 1982, Matrix Formulation of Co-Kriging: Math. Geol., v. 14, p. 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. E., 1984, Cokriging: New Developments,in G. Verly et al. (Eds.), Geostatistics for Natural Resource Characterization: D. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 295–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. E., 1988, Some Aspects of Multivariate Analysis,in C. F. Chung et al. (Eds.), Quantitative Analysis of Mineral and Energy Resources: D. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 669–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. E., 1989, Vector Conditional Simulation,in M. Armstrong, (Ed.), Geostatistics: D. Reidel, Dordrecht, p. 283–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. E., 1991, Pseudo-Cross Variograms, Positive-Definiteness, and Cokriging: Math. Geol., v. 23, p. 805–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quimby, W. F., Borgman, L. E., and Easley, D. H., 1986, Selected Topics in Spatial Statistical Analysis—Nonstationary Vector Kriging, Large Scale Conditional Simulation of Three Dimensional Gaussian Random Fields, and Hypothesis Testing in a Correlated Random Field: Report to the Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab, E.P.A., Las Vegas, Nevada, 140 p.

  • Stein, A., van Dooremolen, W., Bouma, J., and Bregt, A. K., 1988, Cokriging Point Data on Moisture Deficit: Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., v. 52, p. 1418–1423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trangmar, B. B., Yost, R. S., and Uehara, G., 1986, Spatial Dependence and Interpolation of Soil Properties in West Sumatra, Indonesia: II. Co-Regionalization and Co-Kriging: Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., v. 50, p. 1396–1400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, S. R., and Warrick, A. W., 1987, Estimating Soil Water Content Using Cokriging: Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., v. 51, p. 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ver Hoef, J.M., Cressie, N. Multivariable spatial prediction. Math Geol 25, 219–240 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00893273

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00893273

Key words

Navigation