Skip to main content
Log in

Assumption validity in human optimal foraging: The Barí hunters of Venezuela as a test case

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimal foraging theory is being used increasingly as a means of understanding human foraging behavior. One of the central assumptions of optimal foraging theory is that prey items or patches are encountered sequentially and as a Poisson process. Using empirical data gathered on the Barí hunters of Venezuela, we assess the validity of this central assumption. We compare our observed distribution of encounter frequencies with an expected Poisson distribution, utilizing chisquare tests and graphic representations. The results are strikingly consonant with the expected Poisson distribution and lend support to the applicability of optimal foraging models to human hunting behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckerman, S. (1977). The use of palms by the Barí Indians of the Maracaibo Basin.Principes 21(4): 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farb, P., and Armelagos, G. (1980).Consuming Passions: The Anthropology of Eating. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (1985).Good to Eat: Riddles of Food and Culture. Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, K., Hill, K., and O'Connell, J. F. (1982). Why hunters gather: Optimal foraging and the Aché of eastern Paraguay.American Ethnologist 9: 379–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., and Hurtado, A. M. (1989). Hunter-Gatherers of the New World.American Scientist 77(5): 437–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jochim, M. A. (1983). Optimization models in context. In Keene, A. S., and Moore, J. A. (eds.),Archaeological Hammers and Theories. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. B. (1968). What hunters do for a living, or how to make out on scarce resources. In Lee, R. B., and DeVore, I. (eds.),Man the Hunter. Aldine, Chicago, pp. 30–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. B. (1979). The!Kung San. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizarralde, R., and Beckerman, S. (1982). Historia contemporánea de los Barí.Antropologica 58: 3–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair, J. N. (1979). A generalized model of optimal diets.Theoretical Population Biology 15: 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, R. J. (1977). Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Supreme Court: An example of the use of probability theory in political history.History and Theory 16: 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (1972).Stone Age Economics. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (1976).Culture and Practical Reason. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scrimshaw, N. S., and Young, V. R. (1976). The requirements of human nutrition.Scientific American 235(3): 50–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. A. (1983). Anthropological applications of optimal foraging theory: A critical review.Current Anthropology 24(5): 625–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, D. W., and Krebs, J. R. (1986).Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterhalder, B. (1981). Optimal foraging strategies and hunter-gatherer research in anthropology: Theory and methods. In Winterhalder, B., and Smith, E. A. (eds.),Hunter-Gatherer Foraging Strategies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeleznik, W.S., Bennett, I.M. Assumption validity in human optimal foraging: The Barí hunters of Venezuela as a test case. Hum Ecol 19, 499–508 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889792

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889792

Key words

Navigation