Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Definitions, measurements, and classifications of stimuli, situations, and environments

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A review is presented of issues relevant to the definition, measurement, and classification of stimuli, situations, and environments. Problems such as the lack of adequate definitions of concepts, error and bias in measurement procedures, confusion between measurement of a concept and measurement of its behavioral effects, and the lack of agreement among alternative measures are emphasized. It is suggested that concepts be defined in terms of objective characteristics while allowing for the study of the transactional relationship between organism and environment. The work of the ethologists in defining stimuli while studying their relationship to different organismic states and situational contexts is emphasized in this regard. Following Brunswik, it is also suggested that wherever possible there be a representative sampling of variables in natural settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnoult, M. D. (1963). The specification of a “social” stimulus. In Sells, S. B. (ed.),Stimulus Determinants of Behavior, Ronald Press, New York, pp. 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1972).Manual for the Inventory of College Activities. National Computer Systems, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W., and Holland, J. L. (1961). The environmental assessment technique: A way to measure college environments.Journal of Educational Psychology 52: 308–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avant, L. L., and Helson, H. (1973). Theories of perception. In Wolman, B. B. (ed.),Handbook of General Psychology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., pp. 419–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, D., and Fransella, F. (1971).Inquiring Man: The Theory of Personal Constructs. Penguin, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. G. (1960). Ecology and motivation. In Jones, M. R. (ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. G. (1965). Explorations in ecological psychology.American Psychologist 20: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. G. (1968).Ecological Psychology. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, D. A. (1973). Situational factors in behavioral fear assessment.Behavior Therapy 4: 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blurton-Jones, N. G. (ed.) (1972).Ethological Studies of Child Behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, K. S. (1973). Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique.Psychological Review 80: 307–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik, E. (1950). The conceptual framework of psychology.International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. 1. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswik, E. (1956).Perception and the Representaitve Design of Psychological Experiments. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R. V. (1970). Validity of retrospective reports assessed by the multitrait-multimethod analysis.Developmental Psychology Monograph, 3(3): part 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R. V. (1971). Correspondence between behavioral and doll play measures of conscience.Developmental Psychology, 5: 320–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1975). Qualitative knowing in action research.Journal of Social Issues.

  • Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin 56: 81–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D., and Thorne, R. (1972). Attitudes to housing: A cross-cultural comparison.Environment and Behavior 4: 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centra, J. (1972). Comparison of three methods of assessing college environments.Journal of Educational Psychology 63: 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chein, I. (1954). The environment as a determinant of behavior.Journal of Social Psychology 39: 115–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. H. (1970). Environmental psychology. In Newcomb, T. M. (ed.),New Directions in Psychology, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, pp. 1–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. H. (1971). The assessment of places. In McReynolds, P. (ed.),Advances in Psychological Assessment, Science and Behavior Books, Palo Alto, pp. 40–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, K. H. (1973). Environmental psychology.Annual Review of Psychology 24: 403–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekehammar, B. (1974). Interactionism in personality from a historical perspective.Psychological Bulletin 81: 1026–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekehammar, B., and Magnusson, D. (1973). A method to study stressful situations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27: 176–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekehammar, B., Schalling, D., and Magnusson, D. (1975). Dimensions of stressful situations: A comparison between a response analytical and a stimulus analytical approach.Multivariate Behavioral Research 10: 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1971). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In Cole, J. K. (ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 207–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., and Ellsworth, P. (1972).Emotion in the Human Face. Pergamon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S., and Hunt, J. McV. (1968). S-R inventories of hostility and comparisons of the proportions of variance from persons, responses, and situations for hostility and anxiousness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9: 309–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N. S., Hunt, J. McV., and Rosenstein, A. J. (1962). An S-R inventory of anxiousness.Psychological Monographs 76: (17, Whole No. 536).

  • Endler, N. S., and Magnusson, D. (1974). Toward an interactional psychology of personality.Psychological Bulletin 83: 956–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forehand, G. A., and Gilmer, B. von H. (1964). Environmental variables in studies of organizational behavior.Psychological Bulletin 62: 361–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, N. (1972). Toward a taxonomy of situations.American Psychologist 27: 114–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, N., Jensen, O., Beaton, A. E., and Bloxom, B. (1973).Prediction of Organizational Behavior. Pergamon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1959). Perception as a function of stimulation. In Koch, S. (ed.),Psychology: A Study of a Science, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 456–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1960). The concept of the stimulus in psychology.American Psychologist 15: 694–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gump, P. V. (1971). The behavior setting: A promising unit for environmental designers.Landscape Architecture 61: 130–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, H., and May, M. A. (1928).Studies in the Nature of Character: Studies in Deceit. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, E. H. (1970). Ethology and developmental psychology. In Mussen, E. H. (ed.),Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology, Wiley, New York, pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, C. P. (1961).Integrated Principles of Zoology. C. V. Mosby, St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R. A. (1974).Biological Bases of Human Social Behavior. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, J. G., and Gavin, J. F. (1974). Organizational climate: A review and delineation. Technical Report No. 74-02, Industrial Psychological Association of Colorado, Colorado State University.

  • Hunt, D. (1975). Person-environment interaction: A challenge found wanting before it was tried.Review of Educational Research 45: 209–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insel, P. M., and Moos, R. H. (1974). Psychological environments: Expanding the scope of human ecology.American Psychologist 29: 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ittelson, W. H. (1973a). Environment perception and contemporary perceptual theory. In Ittelson, W. H. (ed.),Environment and Cognition, Seminar, New York, pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ittelson, W. H. (ed.) (1973b).Environment and Cognition. Seminar, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ittelson, W. H., Proshansky, H. M., and Rivlin, L. G. (1972). Bedroom size and social interaction of the psychiatric ward. In Wohlwill, J., and Carson, D. H. (eds.),Environment and the Social Sciences: Perspectives and Applications, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ittelson, W. H., Proshansky, H. M., Rivlin, L. G., and Winkel, G. H. (1974).An Introduction to Environmental Psychology. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., and Jones, A. P. (1974). Organizational climate: A review of theory and research.Psychological Bulletin 81: 1096–1112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. J. (1974). Remember that old theory of memory? Well, forget it.American Psychologist 29: 785–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klausner, S. I. (1971).On Man in His Environment. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1935).Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koltuv, B. B. (1962). Some characteristics of intrajudge trait intercorrelations.Psychological Monographs 76: (33, Whole No. 552).

  • Lang, P. J. (1971). The application of psychophysiological methods to the study of psychotherapy and behavior modification. In Bergin, A. E., and Garfield, S. L. (eds.),Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change, Wiley, New York, pp. 75–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, M. P. (1972). Some beginnings of an ecological psychology of old age. In Wohlwill, J. F., and Carson, D. H. (eds.),Environment and the Social Sciences: Perspectives and Applications, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 114–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeper, R. W. (1966). A critical consideration of Egon Brunswik's probabilistic functionalism. In Hammond, K. R. (ed.),The Psychology of Egon Brunswik, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, pp. 405–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951).Field Theory in Social Science. Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. (1974). Proposal to the Carnegie Corporation. Educational Testing Service, Princeton.

  • Lewis, M., and Freedle, R. (1973). Mother-infant dyad: The cradle of meaning. In Pliner, P., Krames, L., and Alloway, T. (eds.),Communication and Affect: Language and Thought, Academic Press, New York, pp. 127–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, B. R. (1976). Specialization and the varieties of environmental experience: Empirical studies within the personality paradigm. In Wapner, S., Cohen, S. B., and Kaplan, B. (eds.),Experiencing the Environment, Plenum, New York, pp. 81–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (1972). Research in environmental perception and behavior: Perspectives on current problems.Environment and Behavior 4: 333–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D., and Riel, M. (1972). The nature of perceived and imagined environments.Environment and Behavior 4: 189–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykken, D. T. (1971). Multiple factor analysis and personality research.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality 5: 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960).The Image of the City. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D. (1971). An analysis of situational dimensions.Perceptual and Motor Skills 32: 851–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D. (1974). The individual in the situation: Some studies on individuals' perceptions of situations.Studia Psychologica 2: 124–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D., and Ekehammar, B. (1975). Perceptions of and reactions to stressful situations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31: 1147–1154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D., and Heffler, B. (1969). The generality of behavioral data. III. Generalization as a function of the number of observational situations.Multivariate Behavioral Research 4: 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D., Gerzen, M., and Nyman, B. (1968a). The generality of behavioral data. I. Generalization from observations on one occasion.Multivariate Behavioral Research 3: 295–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D., Heffler, B., and Nyman, B. (1968b). The generality of behavioral data. II. Replication of an experiment on generalization from observations on one occasion.Multivariate Behavioral Research 3: 415–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A., and Russell, J. A. (1974).An Approach to Environmental Psychology. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. J. (1956). Some recent theoretical developments in multidimensional scaling.Educational and Psychological Measurement 16: 82–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1969). Sources of variance in responses to questionnaires and behavior.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 74: 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1974).Evaluating Treatment Environments: A Social Ecological Approach. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1938).Explorations in Personality. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E. (1957). Discussion of paper by Egon Brunswik. In Gruber, H. E. (ed.),Contemporary Approaches to Cognition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. pp. 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overall, J. E. (1964). Note on the scientific status of factors.Psychological Bulletin 61: 270–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R., and Stern, G. G. (1958). An approach to the measurement of psychological characteristics of college environments.Journal of Educational Psychology 49: 269–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., and Shils, E. A. (eds.) (1951).Toward a General Theory of Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervin, L. A. (1967). A twenty-college study of student X college interaction using TAPE (Transactional Analysis of Personality and Environment): Rationale, reliability and validity.Journal of Educational Psychology 58: 290–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervin, L. A. (1968). Performance and satisfaction as a function of individual-environment fit.Psychological Bulletin 69: 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervin, L. A. (1977). The representative design of person-situation research. In Magnusson, D., and Endler, N. (eds.),Personality at the Crossroads, Hemisphere (Wiley), New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L., and Tolman, E. C. (1959). Brunswik's probabilistic functionalism. In Koch, S. (ed.),Psychology: A Study of a Science, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 502–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, R. H. (1974). The taxonomic classification of behaviors and situations and the problem of behavior-environment congruence.Human Relations 27: 567–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, R. H., and Bouffard, D. L. (1974). Behavioral appropriateness and situational constraint as dimensions of social behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30: 579–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proshansky, H. M., Ittelson, W. H., and Rivlin, L. G. (eds.) (1970).Environmental Psychology: Man and His Physical Setting. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S. (1973). Naturalistic methods for investigating a person's view of people. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, Montreal.

  • Rosenberg, S., and Sedlak, A. (1972). Structural representations of implicit personality theory.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 6: 235–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1955). The role of the psychological situation in determining the direction of human behavior. In Jones, M. R. (ed.),Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 245–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1975). Organizational climates: An essay.Personnel Psychology 28: 447–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. A. (1974). Varieties of cognitive integration.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30: 563–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sells, S. B. (ed.) (1963).Stimulus Determinants of Behavior. Ronald Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signell, K. A. (1966). Cognitive complexity in person perception and nation perception: A developmental approach.Journal of Personality 34: 517–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1971).Beyond Freedom and Dignity. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, G. G. (1962). Environments for learning. In Sanford, N. (ed.),The American College, Wiley, New York, pp. 690–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (ed.) (1951).Handbook of Experimental Psychology. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D. (1972). On the distinction between diversity and crowding.Psychological Review 79: 275–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D., Rall, M., Pinner, B., and Schopler, J. (1973). Physical, social, and personal determinants of the perception of crowding.Environment and Behavior 5: 87–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagiuri, R. (1969). Person perception, In Lindzey, G., and Aronson, E. (eds.).Handbook of Social Psychology, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., pp. 395–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbeigen, N. (1972). Foreword. In Blurton Jones, N. G. (ed.),Ethological Studies of Child Behavior, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S. (1962).Affect, Imagery, and Consciousness. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • True, D. L., and Matson, R. G. (1970). Cluster analysis and multidimensional scaling of archeological sites in Northern Chile.Science 169: 1201–1203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L. R. (1965). Experiments in multi-mode factor analysis.Proceedings of the 1964 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J., pp. 46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, W. B. (1973). Theories of person-environment interaction: Implications for the college student.American College Testing Monograph No. 10, Iowa City.

  • Ward, L. M. (1974). INDSCAL-ing the molar physical environment: Dimensional invariance and dimensional salience. Paper presented at the Psychometric Society Meeting.

  • Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., and Sechrest, L. (1966).Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Research in the Social Sciences. Rand McNally, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, A. (1969). Cognitive complexity, school size, and participation in school behavior settings: A test of the frequency of interaction hypothesis.Journal of Educational Psychology 60: 200–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, A. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects.Journal of Social Issues 25: 41–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkel, G., and Sasanoff, R. (1970). An approach to an objective analysis of behavior in architectural space. In Proshansky, H. M., Ittelson, W. H., and Rivlin, L. G. (eds.),Environmental Psychology: Man and His Physical Setting, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, pp. 619–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wish, M. (1970). Comparisons among multidimensional structures of nations based on different measures of subjective similarity.General Systems 15: 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wish, M., Deutsch, M., and Biener, L. (1970). Differences in conceptual structures of nations: An exploratory study.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16: 361–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwill, J. (1973). The environment is not in the head. Paper presented at EDRA meetings, Blacksburg, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwill, J., and Carson, D. H. (eds.) (1972).Environment and the Social Sciences: Perspectives and Applications. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Livingston College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey

    Lawrence A. Pervin

Authors
  1. Lawrence A. Pervin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Note from the editors: From time to time, Human Ecology will publish a review article. Our first in this series is a review by a psychologist of basic definitional and conceptual problems in environmental studies.

This paper was prepared while the author was a Visiting Research Fellow at the Educational Testing Service. The support of ETS and my colleagues in the Division of Psychological Studies is gratefully acknowledged. The review was also supported in part by a grant from the Rutgers University Research Council.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pervin, L.A. Definitions, measurements, and classifications of stimuli, situations, and environments. Hum Ecol 6, 71–105 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00888567

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00888567

Key words

Search

Navigation