Skip to main content
Log in

The stochastic revolution and the nature of scientific explanation

  • Articles
  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Barker, S. F., The Role of Simplicity in Explanation,Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science (ed. by H. Feigl and G. Maxwell), New York, 1961, and the “Comments” on this paper by W. Salmon, P. Feyerabend and R. Rudner, with Barker's “Rejoinders” thereto, pp. 265–285.

  • Braithwaite, R. B.,Scientific Explanation, Cambridge, 1953.

  • Brodbeck, May, Explanation, Prediction, and ‘Imperfect’ KnowledgeMinnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science ed. by H. Feigl and G. Maxwell,3 (1962) 231–272.

  • Carnap, Rudolf,Logical Foundations of Probability, Chicago, 1950.

  • Feigl, Herbert, Some Remarks on the Meaning of Scientific Explanation,The Psychological Review 52 (1948). Reprinted in H. Feigl and W. Sellars (eds.),Readings in Philosophical Analysis (ed. by H. Feigl and W. Sellars), New York, 1949, pp. 510–514.

  • Feyerabend, P. K., Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.)Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (ed. by H. Feigl and G. Maxwell), 3d Ed., Minneapolis, 1962, pp. 231–272.

  • Grünbaum, Adolf, Temporally-Asymmetric Principles, Parity Between Explanation and Prediction, and Mechanism versus Teleology.Philosophy of Science 29 (1962) 146–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, Norwood R., On the Symmetry Between Explanation and Prediction,The Philosophical Review 68 (1959) 349–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G., The Function of General Laws in History,The Journal of Philosophy 39 (1942) 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G. and Paul Oppenheim, Studies in the Logic of Explanation,Philosophy of Science 15 (1948) 135–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G., Deductive-Nomologicalversus Statistical Explanation,Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (ed. by H. Feigl and G. Maxwell)3 (1962) 98–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst Cause and Effect in Biology,Science 134 (1961) 1501–1506.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Ernest,The Structure of Science, New York, 1961.

  • Papandreou, Andreas G., Explanation and Prediction in Economics,Science 129 (1959) 1096–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R.,The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London, 1959.

  • Rescher, Nicholas, On Prediction and Explanation,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8 (1958) 281–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas, Discrete State Systems, Markov Chains, and Problems in the Theory of Scientific Explanation and Prediction,Philosophy of Science 29 (1962).

  • Scheffler I., Explanation, Prediction, and Abstraction,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7 (1957) 293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, Michael, Definitions, Explanations, and Theories, in H. Feigl, M. Scriven, and G. Maxwell (eds.),Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (ed. by H. Feigl, M. Scriven, and G. Maxwell)2 (1958) 99–195.

  • Scriven, Michael, Explanation and Prediction in Evolutionary Theory,Science 129 (1959) 477–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, Michael, Explanations, Predictions, and Laws,Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science (ed. by H. Feigl and G. Maxwell)3 (1962) 170–230.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rescher, N. The stochastic revolution and the nature of scientific explanation. Synthese 14, 200–215 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881996

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881996

Keywords

Navigation