Skip to main content
Log in

Role of farmers' attitudes in adoption of irrigation in Saskatchewan

  • Published:
Irrigation and Drainage Systems

Abstract

Adoption of a new technology, such as irrigation, is a complex phenomenon. Several factors of economic and social nature contribute to the farm-level decisions affecting adoption. In this study, the role played by attitudes of potential adopters towards irrigation and its subsequent adoption on their farm unit was estimated. Two models were estimated, one incorporating only adopters' socio-economic characteristics, and the other, only their attitudes towards irrigation. Results suggest that adopters' attitude, particularly with respect to economic and environmental effects of irrigation, were significant determinants of their decision to proceed with adoption of irrigation, and have a role to play in adoption of irrigation over and above that explained by socio-economic characteristics. In particular, these results suggest that negative perceptions with respect to economics of irrigation and those related to its detrimental impacts on environmental quality, particularly through soil salinity, may be significant deterrents for adoption of irrigation. The study suggests that planning of large scale water development projects, particularly those involving irrigation, must be cognizant of attitudes of potential adopters. Furthermore, during the planning stages, more attention should be paid to the development of proper educational programs, as well as extension packages, to ensure that potential adopters formulate correct attitudes towards the new technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett H.C. 1953.Innovation: The Basis of Cultural Change. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casterline G., Dinar A. & Zilberman D. 1989. The adoption of modern irrigation technologies in the United States. In: Schmitz E (Ed),Free Trade and Agricultural Diversification: Canada and the United States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell M.F. & Zilberman D. 1986. The effects of well depth and land quality on the choice of irrigation technology.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68(4): 798–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder G., Just R.E. & Zilberman D. 1985. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey.Economic Development and Cultural Change 33: 255–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder G. & O'Mara G.T. 1981. Farm size and the adoption of green revolution technology.Economic Development and Cultural Change 30: 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M. 1967. Attitude and the prediction of behaviour. In: Fishbein M. (Ed),Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement, New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fliegel F.C. & Kivlin J.E. 1962.Differences Among Improved Farm Practices as Related to Rates of Adoption. University Park: Pennsylvania Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 691.

  • Griliches Z. 1957. Hybrid corn: an exploration in the economics of technological change.Econometrica 25: 501–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just R.E. & Zilberman D. 1983. Stochastic structure, farm size, and technology adoption in developing agriculture.Oxford Economic Papers 35: 307–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivlin J.E. & Fliegel F.C. 1968. Orientations to agriculture: a factor analysis of farmers' perceptions of new practices.Rural Sociology 33(2): 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemon N. 1973.Attitudes and Their Measurement. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield E. 1961. Technical change and the rate of imitation.Econometrica 29: 741–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negri D.H. & Brooks D.H. 1990. Determinants of irrigation technology choice.Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 15: 213–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck R.S. & Rubinfeld D.L. 1981.Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers Everett M. 1983.Diffusion of Innovation 3rd edition. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosagger G. 1986.The Economics of Production and Innovation: An Industrial Perspective, 2nd edition. Toronto: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha R.B. & Gopalakrishnan C. 1989. Adoption and diffusion of drip irrigation technology: an analysis using a joint discrete and continuous choice framework. University of Hawaii Working Paper.

  • Taylor J.G., Stewart T.R. & Downton M. 1988. Perceptions of drought in the Ogallala Aquifer Region.Environment and Behaviour 20(2): 150–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirtle C.G. & Ruttan V.W. 1988.The Role of Demand and Supply in the Generation and Diffusion of Technical Change. New York: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch F. 1978. The role of investment in human capital in agriculture. In: Schultz T.W. (Ed),Distortion of Agricultural Incentives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kulshreshtha, S.N., Brown, W.J. Role of farmers' attitudes in adoption of irrigation in Saskatchewan. Irrig Drainage Syst 7, 85–98 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00880869

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00880869

Key words

Navigation