Skip to main content
Log in

Is sustainable growth optimal?

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes sustainable growth in a stochastic environment, with human extinction as a possible outcome. The basic constraint of sustainability is that consumption never decreases over an infinite horizon, which requires that the probability of extinction be maintained at zero. We show that this problem can be examined in a standard optimal-growth model. Under certain conditions, the solution of this problem is a corner solution with probability of survival equal to one, at the cost of economic growth. These conditions depend on the initial development level and on the elasticity of utility with respect to consumption. In some circumstances, which depend on the social discount rate, optimal-growth paths do not exist. In these situations, the sustainable-growth concept has a clear autonomy with respect to the usual optimality criterion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, P., and J.G. Sutinen. (1984). “Stochastic Bio-Economics: A Review of Basic Methods and Results.”Marine Resource Economics 1(2), 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranzini, A., and F. Bourguignon. (1994). “Is Sustainable Growth Optimal?” Milano: Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei, Nota di Lavoro 60.94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E.B. (1987). “The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development.”Environmental Conservation 14(2), 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E.B., and A. Markandya. (1990). “The Conditions for Achieving Environmentally Sustainable Growth.”European Economic Review 34, 659–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1990). “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth.”Journal of Political Economy 98(5), S103-S125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S., and K.M. Murphy. (1988). “A Theory of Rational Addiction.”Journal of Political Economy 96(4), 675–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertola, G. (1993). “Factor Shares and Savings in Endogenous Growth.”American Economic Review 83(5), 1184–1198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaloupka, F. (1991). “Rational Addictive Behaviour and Cigarette Smoking.”Journal of Political Economy 99(4), 722–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R. (1989). “What Is Ecological Economics?”Ecological Economics 1(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H.E. (1990). “Towards Some Operational Principles of Sustainable Development.”Ecological Economics 2(1), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1993). “Optimal Development and the Idea of Net National Product.” Paris: A Joint CEPR/OECD Development Centre Conference.

  • Dasgupta, P., and G. Heal. (1974). “The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources.”Review of Economic Studies, Symposium on the Economics of Exhaustible Resources, 3–28.

  • Economist, The. (1992). “Let Them Eat Pollution.” February 8, p. 66.

  • Ehrlich, I., and H. Chuma. (1990). “A Model of the Demand for Longevity and the Value of Life Extension.”Journal of Political Economy 98(4), 761–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L.G. (1987). “Impatience.” In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman (eds.),The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, B.A. (1973). “Optimal Consumption Planning in a Polluted Environment.”Economic Record 49(128), 534–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, B.A. (1980). “Optimal Energy Use in a Polluted Environment.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 7, 321–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M. (1972). “The Demand for Health: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation.” New York: Columbia University Press (for NBER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.M. (1993). “Pollution and Growth: What Do We Know?” Paris: A Joint CEPR/OECD Development Centre Conference.

  • Heal, G. (1982). “Interactions Between Economy and Climate: A Framework for Policy Design Under Uncertainty.” In V. Kerry Smith and A. Witte (eds.),Advances in Applied Microeconomics (Vol 3). Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornung, M., and M. Holland. (1992). “A Survey of Dose-Response Functions for Use in Valuation of the Environmental Costs of Air Pollution.” Geneva: Thirty-Third International Conference of the Applied Econometric Association.

  • Keeler, E., M. Spence, and R. Zeckhauser. (1971). “The Optimal Control of Pollution.”Journal of Economic Theory 4, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krautkramer, J.A. (1990). “Neoclassical Economics and Sustainability.” Preliminary Draft, Department of Economics, Washington State University.

  • Merton, R.C. (1971). “Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a Continuous-Time Model.”Journal of Economic Theory 3, 373–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.C. (1975). “An Asymptotic Theory of Growth Under Uncertainty.”Review of Economic Studies 42, 375–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirer, T.W. (1991). “On the Optimal Length of Life: A Life Cycle Model of Suicide in Retirement.” Mimeo, State University of New York at Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1984).Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D.W., E.B. Barbier, and A. Markandya. (1988).Sustainable Development. Economics and Environment in the Third World. Hants: Edward Elgar Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D.W., A. Markandya, and E.B. Barbier. (1989).Blueprint for a Green Economy. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzey, J. (1989). “Economic Analysis of Sustainable Growth and Sustainable Development.” Washington, DC: World Bank Environment Department, Working Paper No. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R.S. (1984). “Uncertainty in the Theory of Renewable Resources Markets.”Review of Economic Studies 51, 289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plourde, C., and D. Yeung. (1989). “A Model of Industrial Pollution in a Stochastic Environment.”Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 16, 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1988). “The Value of Changes in Life Expectancy.”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1(3), 285–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L.H. (1992). “Summers on Sustainable Growth.”The Economist, May 30, p. 71.

  • Tahvonen, O. (1991). “On the Dynamics of Renewable Resource Harvesting and Pollution Control.”Environmental and Resource Economics 1(1), 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T.H. (1988).Environmental and Natural Resource Economics (2nd ed.). Glenview: Scott, Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toman, M.A. (1992). “The Difficulty in Defining Sustainability.”Resources 106, 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Ploeg, F., and C. Withagen. (1991). “Pollution Control and the Ramsey Problem.”Environmental and Resource Economics 1(2), 215–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W.K., and M.J. Moore. (1989). “Rates of Time Preference and Valuations of the Duration of Life.”Journal of Public Economics 38, 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED. (1987).Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baranzini, A., Bourguignon, F. Is sustainable growth optimal?. Int Tax Public Finan 2, 341–356 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877505

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877505

Key words

Navigation