Abstract
The feeding activity of adult roach (Rutilus rutilus), perch (Perca fluviatilis) and ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus) was studied over a one year cycle to show trophic relations between fish and the prey communities in eutrophic Lake Aydat.
Daily consumption rates were referred to the stock of the different age classes of fish. Seven food compartments (phytoplankton, macrophytes, Cladocera, Copepoda, macroinvertebrates, fish and sediment) were used by the fish. The main prey compartment ofR. rutilus were macroinvertebrates (39.7%), sediment (29.0%), macrophytes (15.4%) and phytoplankton (14.9%). Little zooplankton was consumed (2.4%).P. fluviatilis fed mainly on macroinvertebrates and fish fry (both 41.8%) and some zooplankton (15.0%). ForG. cernuus, macroinvertebrates dominated in the diet (97.4%). During spring, Bacillariophyceae and macroinvertebrates represented the principal preys. During summer, insect larvae, phytoplankton and macrophytes were the principal components of the diet. At the end of summer, macrofauna was scare and fish tended to move to the pelagic zone feeding on plankton. In autumn, the prey spectrum was large. During winter, sediment was the most important item consumed, together with some macroinvertebrates. The impact of this fish community through consumption is highest on macroinvertebrates (40.7%), flora (27.7%) and sediment (28.4%). The predation of these three fish on zooplankton was low (1% per day of the zooplankton biomass) and restricted to periods when the other items were scarce. Interspecific competition is not excluded for macroinvertebrates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amblard, C., 1986. Les nucléotides adényliques: intérêts pour l'étude de la biomasse, de l'activité métabolique et de la structure des peuplements phytoplanctoniques lacustres. Thèse Doct. d'Etat, Univ. Clermont II, 317 pp.
Bergman, E., 1990. Effects of roach Rutilus rutilus on two percids, Perca fluviatilis and Gymnocephalus cernua: importance of species interactions for diet shifts. Oikos 57:241–249.
Boisclair, D., and W.C. Legett, 1988. An in situ exeprimental evaluation of the Elliot and Persson and the Eggers models for estimating fish daily ration. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45:138–145.
Brooks, J.L., and S.L. Dodson, 1965. Predation, body size and composition of plankton. Science 150:28–35.
Butler IV, M.J., 1989. Community responses to variable predation: field studies with sunfish and freshwater macroinverebrates. Ecol. Monogr. 59:311–328.
Collins, N.C., 1989. Daytime exposure to fish predation for littoral benthic organisms in unproductive lakes. Can J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46:137–144.
Diehl, S., 1988. Foranging efficiency of three freshwater fishes: effects of structural complexity and light. Oikos 53:207–214.
Drenner, R.W., J.R. Mummert, Jr., F. De Noyelles, and D. Kettle, 1984. Selective particle ingestion by a filter-feeding fish and its impact on phytoplankton community structure. Limnol. Oceanogr. 29:941–948.
Eggers, D.M., 1977. Factors in interpreting data obtained by diel sampling of fish stomachs. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34:290–294.
Gannon, J.E., 1972. Effects of eutrophication and fish predation on recent changes in zooplankton Crustacea species composition in Lake Michigan. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc. 91:82–84.
Gliwicz, Z.M., and A. Prejs, 1977. Can planktivorous fish keep in check planctonic crustacean populations. A test of size efficiency hypothesis in typical polish lakes. Ekol. Pol. 25:567–591.
Hayne, D.W., and R.C. Ball, 1956. Benthic productivity as influenced by fish predation. Limnol. and Oceanogr. 1:162–175.
Holt, S.J., 1963. A method for determining gear selectivity and its application. ICNAF Spec. Publ. 5:106–115 (first publication 1957: ICNAF/ICES/FAO Jt. Sci. Meet., Lisbon, Contrib.: 15–21 p.).
Hrabacek, J., and M. Novotna-Dvorakova, 1965. Plankton of four backwaters related to their size and fish stock. Rozpr. Csl. Akad. Ved. Rada mat. prir. Vrd. 75:1–65.
Jamet, J.-L., 1991. Importance de la faune ichtyologique dans le lac d'Aydat, milieu eutrophe de la zone tempérée Nord; ses relations trophiques avec les autres composants de l'écosystème. Thèse Doct. Univ. (PhD thesis), Université Blaise Pascal de Clermont-Ferrand, 263 pp.
Jamet, J.L., P. Grès, N. Lair, and G. Lasserre, 1990a. Diel feeding cycle of roach (Rutilus rutilus L.) in Eutrophic Lake Aydat (Massif Central, France). Arch. Hydrobiol. 118:371–382.
Jamet, J.-L., C. Garavaglia, R. Dal Mollin, and D. Sargos, 1990b. Fécondité, croissance et régime alimentaire de la perche adulte (Perca fluviatilis, L.) du lac de Monate (Italie du Nord). Riv. Idrobiol. 29:597–615.
Jamet, J.-L., and N. Lair, 1991. An example of diel feeding cycle of two percids, perch (Perca fluviatilis) and ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus) in eutrophic Lake Aydat (France). Ann. Sci. Nat, Paris 12:99–105.
Jolly, G.M., 1965. Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika 52:225–247.
Kerfoot, W.C., and A. Sih (Eds), 1987. Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. Univ. Press New England, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Levins, R., 1968. Evolution in a changing environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Mac Queen, D.J., and S.R. Post, 1988. Cascading trophic interactions: uncoupling at the zooplankton-phytoplankton link. Hydrobiologia 159:27–296.
Mesnil, B., 1988. Logiciels pour l'évaluation des stocks de poisson. FAO Doc. Tech. Pêches 101:1–78.
Mills, C.A., and J.L. Forney, 1983. Impact on Daphnia pulex of predation by yellow perch in Oneida Lake, New-York. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 112:154–161.
Northcote, T.G., C.J. Walters, and J.M.B. Hume, 1978. Initial impacts of experimental fish introductions on the macrozooplankton of small oligotrophic lakes. Ver. internat. Verein. Limnol. 20:2003–2012.
Persson, L., 1983. Effects of intra- and interspecific competition of dynamics and size structure of a perch Perca fluviatilis and a roach Rutilus rutilus population. Oikos 41:126–132.
Persson, L., 1986. Patterns of food evacuation in fishes: a critical review. Env. Biol. Fishes 16:51–58.
Prejs, A., K. Lewandowski, and A. Stanczykowska-Pietrovska, 1990. Size selective predation by roach (Rutilus rutilus) on zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha): field studies. Oecologia 83:378–384.
Ravera, O., and J.-L. Jamet, 1991. The diet of the rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus) in relation with the possible consequences from the removal of this species from an eutrophic lake. Arch. Hydrobiol. 123:99–109.
Schoener, T., 1968. The Anolis fauna of the Biminis: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49:704–726.
Sommer, U., Z.M. Gliwicz, W. Lampert, and A. Duncan, 1986. The PEG-model of seasonal succession of planktonic events in freshwaters. Arch. Hydrobiol. 106:433–471.
Taleb, H., N. Lair, P. Reyes-Marchant, and J.L. Jamet, 1993. Observations on vertical migrations of zooplankton at four different stations of a small, eutrophic, temperate zone lake, in relation to their predators. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. Ergebn. Limnol. 39:199–216.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jamet, JL. Feeding activity of adult roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) and ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus (L.)) in eutrophic Lake Aydat (France). Aquatic Science 56, 376–387 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877183
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877183