Abstract
We investigate the nature of temporal variations in the statistical properties of seismicity associated with the North Anatolian Fault Zone between longitudes 31°–41°E during the instrumental period 1900–1992. Temporal variations in the seismicb value and the fractal (correlation) dimensionD c of earthquake epicenters are examined for earthquakes of magnitudeM S ≥4.5, using sliding windows of 100 consecutive events.b varies temporally between 0.6 and 1.0, andD c between 0.6 and 1.4, both representing significant fluctuations above the errors in measurement technique. A strong negative correlation (r=−0.85) is observed betweenb andD c , consistent with previous observation of seismicity in Japan and southern California. Major events early in this century (M S ≥7) are associated with lowb and highD c , respectively consistent with greater stress intensity and greater spatial clustering of epicenters—both implying a greater degree of stress concentration at this time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aki, K. (1965),Maximum Likelihood Estimate of b in the Formula logN=a-bm and its Confidence, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ.43, 237–239.
Aki, K,A probabilistic synthesis of precursory phenomena. InEarthquake Prediction—An International Review (Simpson, D. W., and P. G. Richards, eds.) (American Geophys. Union, Maurice Ewing Series 4, 1981) pp. 566–574.
Allen, C. (1969),Active Faulting in Northern Turkey, Contribution 1577, Div. of Geol. Sci., Calif. Inst. of Technol, Pasadena, 32 pp.
Alptekin, Ö. (1973),Focal Mechanisms of Earthquakes in Western Turkey and their Tectonic Implications, Ph.D. Thesis, New Mexico Inst. of Mining and Teach., Socorro, New Mexico.
Ambraseys, N. (1970),Some Characteristic Features of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, Tectonophysics9, 143–165.
Aviles, C. A., Scholz, C. H., andBoatwright, J. (1986),Fractal Analysis Applied to Characteristics Segment of the San Andreas Fault, J. Geophys. Res.92, 331–344.
Barka, A. (1992),The North Anatolian Fault-Zone, Annales Tectonicae6, 164–195.
Barka, A., andKadinsky-Cade, K. (1988),Strike-slip Fault Geometry in Turkey and its Influence on Earthquake Activity, Tectonics7, 663–684.
Gibowicz, S. J. (1973),Variation of the Frequency-magnitude Relation during Earthquake Sequences in New Zealand, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.63, 517–528.
Grassberger, P., andProcaccia, I. (1983),Measuring the Strangeness of Strange Attractors, Physica9D, 189–208.
Henderson, J., Main, I. G., Meredith, P. G., andSammonds, P. R. (1992),The Evolution of Seismicity: Observation, Experiment and a Fracture-mechanical Interpretation, J. Struct. Geol.14, 905–913.
Hirata, T. (1989),A Correlation between the b Value and the Fractal Dimension of Earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res.94, 7507–7514.
Hirata, T., Satoh, T., andIto, K. (1988),Fractal Structure of Spatial Distribution of Microfracturing in Rock, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc.90, 369–374.
Huang, J., andTurbot, D. L. (1988),Fractal Distributions of Stress and Strength and Variations of b Value, Earth Planet. Sci. Letts.91, 223–230.
Jackson, J. A. (1992),Partitioning of Strike-slip and Convergent Motion between Eurasia and Arabia in Eastern Turkey and the Caucasus, Geophys. J.97, 12471–12479.
Kagan, Y. Y., andKnopoff, L. (1980),Spatial Distribution of Earthquakes: The Two-point Correlation Function, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc.62, 303–320.
Ketin, I. (1948),Über die tektonisch-mechanischen Folgerungen aus den grossen anatolischen Erdbeben des letzten Dezenniums, Geol. Rundsch.36, 77–83.
Ma, H. C. (1978),Variations of the b Values before Several Large Earthquakes Occurred in North China, Acta. Geophys. Sinica21, 126–141.
Main, I. G. (1992),Damage Mechanics with Long-range Interactions: Correlation between the Seismic b Value and the Fractal Two-point Correlation Dimension, Geophys. J. Int.111, 531–541.
Main, I. G., Meredith, P. G., Sammonds, P. R., andJones, C.,Influence of fractal flaw distributions on rock deformation in the brittle field. InDeformation Mechanisms, Rheology and Tectonics (Knipe R. J., and E. H. Rutter, eds.) (Geol. Soc. London Special Publication54, 1990) pp. 81–96.
Mandelbrot, B. B.,The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman Press, San Francisco 1982).
McKenzie, D. D. (1972),Active Tectonics of the Alpine-Himalayan Belt: The Aegean Sea and Surrounding Regions, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc.30, 109–185.
Mogi, K. (1962),Magnitude-frequency Relation for Elastic Shocks Accompanying Fractures of Various Materials and Some Related Problems in Earthquakes, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Tokyo Univ.40, 831–853.
Okubo, P. G., andAki, K. (1987),Fractal Geometry in the San Andreas Fault System, J. Geophys. Res.92, 345–355.
Öncel, A. O., Main, I. G., Alptekin, Ö., andCowie, P. A. (1994),Spatial Variations in the Fractal Properties of Seismicity in the North Anatolian Fault Zones, Tectonophysics (submitted).
Sadowsky, M. A., Golubeva, T. V., Pisarenko, V. F., andShnirman, M. G. (1984),Characteristic Dimensions of Rock and Hierarchy Properties of Seismicity, Izv. Ac. Sci. USSR Phys. Solid Earth20, 87–96.
Scholz, C. H. (1968),The Frequency-magnitude Relation of Microfracturing in Rock and its Relation to Earthquakes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am.58, 399–415.
Sipahioĝlu, S., andAlptekin, Ö. (1988),Present Appearance of Earthquake Problem in Turkey, Jeofizik2, 151–183.
Smith, W. D. (1986),Evidence for Precursory Changes in the Frequency-magnitude b Value, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc.86, 815–838.
§engör, A. M. C. (1979),The North Anatolian Transform Fault: Its Age, Offset and Tectonic Significance, J. Geol. Soc. London136, 269–282.
Turcotte, D. L. (1986),Fractals and Fragmentation, J. Geophys. Res.91, 1921–1926.
Toksöz, M. N., Shakal, A. F., andMichael, A. J. (1979),Space-time Migration of Earthquakes along the N. Anatolian Fault Zone and Seismic Gaps, Pure and Appl. Geophys.117, 1258–1269.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Öncel, A.O., Main, I., Alptekin, Ö. et al. Temporal variations in the fractal properties of seismicity in the North Anatolian Fault Zone between 31°E and 41°E. PAGEOPH 147, 147–159 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876441
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00876441