Skip to main content
Log in

Defenses and conservative revisions of evidential decision theories: Metatickles and ratificationism

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Eells, Ellery: 1981, ‘Causality, Utility, and Decision’,Synthese 48.

  • Eells, Ellery: 1984a, ‘Causal Decision Theory’,PSA 1984, vol. 2.

  • Eells, Ellery: 1984b, ‘Metatickles and the Dynamics of Deliberation’,Theory and Decision,17, 71–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, Ellery and Elliott Sober: 1986, ‘Common Causes and Decision Theory’,Philosophy of Science 53, 223–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, Allan and William L. Harper: 1978, ‘Two Kinds of Expected Utility’, in C. Hooker et al. (eds.),Foundations and Applications of Decision Theory, vol. 1, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 125–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, Paul: 1985, ‘Decision Theory in Light of Newcomb's Problem’,Philosophy of Science,77, 702–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, Richard C.: 1965,The Logic of Decision, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, Richard C.: 1977, ‘A Note on the Kinematics of Preference’,Erkenntnis 11, 135–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, Richard C.: 1981, ‘The Logic of Decision Defended’,Synthese 48, 473–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, Richard C.: 1983,The Logic of Decision: Second Edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, Richard C.: (forthcoming in a festschrift for Wesley Salmon) ‘How to Probabilize a Newcomb Problem’.

  • Lewis, David: 1976, ‘Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities’,The Philosophical Review,85, 297–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, Robert: 1969, ‘Newcomb's Problem and Two Principles of Choice’, in N. Rescher et al. (eds.),Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 114–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Huw: 1986, ‘Against Causal Decision Theory’,Synthese 67, 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowicz, Włodzimierz: 1985, ‘Ratificationism Without Ratification: Jeffrey Meets Savage’,Theory and Decision,19, 171–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowicz, Włodzimierz: 1986, ‘Ratifiability and Stability’, circulated manuscript.

  • Sobel, Jordan Howard: 1985a, ‘Not Every Prisoner's Dilemma Is a Newcomb Problem’, in R. Campbell and L. Sowden (eds.),Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation: Prisoner's Dilemma and Newcomb's Problem, University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, Jordan Howard: 1985b, ‘Circumstances and Dominance in a Causal Decision Theory’,Synthese 63, 167–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, Jordan Howard: 1986, ‘Notes on Decision Theory: Old Wine in New Bottles’.Australasian Journal of Philosophy,64, 407–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, Jordan Howard: 1987, ‘Self-doubts and Dutch Strategies’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy,65, 56–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, Jordan Howard: ‘Partition-theorems for Causal Decision Theories’,Philosophy of Science, forthcoming.

  • Sobel, Jordan Howard: forthcoming ‘Metatickles, Ratificationism, and Newcomb-like Problems without Dominance’,Proceedings of the FUR-III: Risk, Decision and Rationality, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

  • Stalnaker, Robert C.: 1972, ‘Letter to David Lewis: May 21, 1972’. in W. L. Harper et al. (eds.),Ifs: Conditionals, Belief, Decision, Chance, and Time, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weirich, Paul: 1986, ‘Decisions in Dynamic Settings’,PSA 1986, Volume One, pp. 438–49.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper includes a revision of ‘Metatickles and Ratificationism’,PSA 1986, Volume 1, and expands two-fold upon that paper, which is confined for the most part to material presented to members of the Philosophy of Science Association at its 1986 meetings. I am grateful to Włodzimierz Rabinowicz for criticism and many useful suggestions, and, as always, to Willa Freeman-Sobel, for her valuable comments on every draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sobel, J.H. Defenses and conservative revisions of evidential decision theories: Metatickles and ratificationism. Synthese 75, 107–131 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873276

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00873276

Keywords

Navigation