Abstract
Selective attrition can detract from the internal and external validity of longitudinal research. Four tests of selective attrition applicable to longitudinal prevention research were conducted on data bases from two recent studies. These tests assessed (1) differences between dropouts and stayers in terms of pretest indices of primary outcome variables (substance use), (2) differences in change scores for dropouts and stayers, (3) differences in rates of attrition among experimental conditions, and (4) differences in pretest indices for dropouts among conditions. Results of these analyses indicate that cigarette smokers, alcohol drinkers, and marijuana users are more likely to drop out than nonusers, limiting the external validity of both studies. For one project, differential rates of attrition among conditions suggested a possible attrition artifact which will interfere with interpretation of outcome results, possibly masking true program effectiveness. Recommendations for standardizing reports of attrition and for avoiding attrition through second efforts are made.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Botvin, G., and Eng, A. (1982). The efficacy of a multicomponent approach to the prevention of cigarette smoking,Prevent. Med. 11: 199–211.
Botvin, G., Eng, A., and Williams, C. (1980). Preventing the onset of cigarette smoking through life skills training.Prevent. Med. 9: 135–143.
Cronbach, L. J., and Snow, R. E. (1977).Aptitude and Instructional Methods, Irvington, New York.
Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C., Phillips, D. C., Walker, D. F., and Weiner, S. S. (1980).Toward Reform of Program Evaluation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Evans, R. I., Rozelle, R. M., Mittelmark, M. B., Hansen, W. B., Bane, A. L., and Havis, J. (1978). Deterring the onset of smoking in children: Knowledge of immediate physiological effects and coping with peer pressure, media pressure and parent modelling.J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 8: 126–135.
Evans, R. I., Rozelle, R. M., Maxwell, S. E., Raines, B. E., Dill, C. A., Guthrie, T. J., Henderson, A. H., and Hill, P. C. (1981). Social modeling films to deter smoking in adolescents: Results of a three-year field investigation.J. Appl. Psychol. 66: 399–414.
Flay, B. R., D'Avernas, J. R., Best, J. A., Kersell, M. W., and Ryan, K. B. (1983). Cigarette smoking: Why young people do it and ways of preventing it. In McGrath, P., and Firestone, P. (eds.),Pediatric and Adolescent Behavioral Medicine, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Hurd, P. D., Johnson, C. A., Pechacek, T., Bast, L. P., Jacobs, D. R., and Luepker, R. V. (1980). Prevention of cigarette smoking in seventh grade students.J. Behav. Med. 3: 15–28.
Josephson, E., and Rosen, M. A. (1978). Panel loss in a high school drug study. In Kandel, D. (ed.),Longitudinal Research on Drug Use: Empirical Findings and Methodological Issues, Hemisphere, Washington, D.C.
Jurs, S. G., and Glass, G. V. (1971). The effect of experimental mortality on the internal and external validity of the randomized comparative experiment.J. Exp. Educ. 40: 62–66.
Lord, F. M. (1967). A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons.Psychol. Bull. 68: 304–305.
Lord, F. M. (1969). Statistical adjustments when comparing pre-existing groups.Psychol. Bull. 72: 336–337.
Luepker, R. V., Johnson, C. A., Murray, D. M., and Pechacek, T. F. (1983). Prevention of cigarette smoking: Three-year follow-up of an education program for youth.J. Behav. Med. 6: 53–62.
McAlister, A., Perry, C., Killen, J., Slinkard, L., and Maccoby, N. (1980). Pilot study of smoking, alcohol and drug abuse prevention.Am. J. Publ. Health 70: 719–721.
Riecken, H. W., and Boruch, R. F. (1974).Social Experimentation: A Method for Planning and Evaluating Social Intervention, Academic Press, New York.
Severson, H. H., and Ary, D. V. (1983). Sampling bias due to consent procedures with adolescents.Addict. Behav. 8: 433–437.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by California Department of Health Services Contract 82-79828 and National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant 1-RO1-DA02941.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hansen, W.B., Collins, L.M., Malotte, C.K. et al. Attrition in prevention research. J Behav Med 8, 261–275 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00870313
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00870313