Skip to main content
Log in

Time courses in visual-information processing: Some empirical evidence for inhibition

  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In the literature two different views on the time course of activation of “recognition units” — hypothetical units that represent identity information — are proposed. The first view assumes that the recognition units accumulate activation gradually over time. The second assumes that the activation levels increase fast initially and then start to decrease. Hagenzieker and Van der Heijden (1990) have proposed a more general information-processing model, which is compatible with both views. In this model a treshold determines what type of time course will be obtained. For below-threshold-activation values a gradual accumulation of activation will be found; for above-threshold values activation levels will first increase and then, because of inhibition, decrease. This model served as a starting-point for the present paper. Elaboration of this model led to two testable hypotheses with regard to identification performance. The first prediction is that evidence for inhibition should be observed only under relatively bright luminance conditions. The second is that, given inhibition, the amount of the effect of this inhibition should increase over time. A partial-report bar-probe task was used to test the predictions. The experiment involved two luminance conditions and the information was sampled at two different moments in time. To control for possible localization artefacts a digit-naming task was also used. Evidence for inhibition was found in both luminance conditions. In accordance with the model the amount of the effect of inhibition increased over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Averbach, E., & Coriell, A. S. (1961). Short-term memory in vision.Bell System Technical Journal, 40, 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition.Nature, 226, 177–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broca, A., & Sulzer, D. (1902). La sensation lumineuse en fonction du temps.Comptes Rendus de Séances de la Société de Biologie (Paris), 37, 493–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (1984). Sensory memory — A tutorial review. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X, Control of language processes. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K. (1978). Perceptual processing in letter recognition and reading. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds).,Handbook of perception, Vol. IX. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaar, R. (1990). The partial-report bar-probe task and its errors (in preparation).

  • Hagenzieker, M. P., & Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1990). Time courses in visual information processing: Some theoretical considerations.Psychological Research, 52, 5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahnemann, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D. (1980). Visual information processing: The structure and creation of visual representations.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, B290, 199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mewhort, D. J. K., & Campbell, A. J. (1978). Processing spatial information and the selective masking effect.Perception & Psychophysics, 24(1), 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mewhort, D. J. K., Campbell, A. J., Marchetti, F. M., & Campbell, J. I. D. (1981). Identification, localization, and “iconic memory”: An evaluation of the bar-probe task.Memory & Cognition, 9, 50–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tramer, S. (1981). Data versus probe errors in the bar-probe task: A re-evaluation of the dual-buffer model. Unpublished MA thesis, Queen's University at Kingston.

  • Van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1987). Central selection in vision. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.),Issues in perception and action. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hagenzieker, M.P., van der Heijden, A.H.C. & Hagenaar, R. Time courses in visual-information processing: Some empirical evidence for inhibition. Psychol. Res 52, 13–21 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00867206

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00867206

Keywords

Navigation