Abstract
Studies were conducted on the reliability and discriminative utility of the Adolescent Cognitions Scale for juvenile sexual offenders. Results indicate that the scale had only marginal reliability from test to retest conditions, and did not discriminate between groups of juvenile sexual offenders and youth without a history of sexual perpetration. The authors offer hypotheses for the obtained results, and suggest avenues for further research concerning the development of this instrument.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, G.G., Becker, J.V., & Cunningham-Rathner, J. (1984). Complications, consent, and cognitions in sex between children and adults.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 7, 89–103.
Abel, G.G., Gore, D.K., Holland, C.L., Camp, N., et al. (1989). The measurement of the cognitive distortions of child molesters.Annals of Sex Research, 2, 135–152.
Crowne, D.P., & Marlowe, D. (1964).The approval motive: Studies in evaluation dependence. New York: Wiley.
Rock, D.L. (1981). The confounding of two self-report assertion measures with the tendency to give socially desirable responses in self-description.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 743–744.
Saunders, D.G. (1991). Procedures for adjusting self-reports of violence for social desirability bias.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 336–344.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hunter, J.A., Becker, J.V., Kaplan, M. et al. Reliability and discriminative utility of the Adolescent Cognitions Scale for juvenile sexual offenders. Annals of Sex Research 4, 281–286 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00850058
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00850058