Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric evaluation of biogenic versus psychogenic erectile dysfunction

  • Published:
Annals of sex research

Abstract

Psychological test data, including the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), Symptom Check List (SCL-90R) and the Derogatis Stress Profile (DSP), was analyzed for male veterans who had been previously diagnosed as suffering from either psychogenic or biogenic erectile dysfunction. Consistent with previous studies, there were no significant differences found between the two groups on the MMPI profile scores and the selected research scales. However, there were also no differences found on either the SCL-90R or the DSP, further questioning the use of objective psychometric instruments in discriminating the etiology of sexual dysfunction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beutler, L.E., Karacan, I., Anch, A.M., Salis, P., Scott, F., & Williams, R. (1975). MMPI and MIT discriminators of biogenic and psychogenic impotence.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 899–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beutler, L.E., Scott, R.B., & Karacan, I. (1976). Psychological screening of impotent men.Journal of Urology, 116, 193–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom, W.G., Welsh, G.S., & Dahlstrom, L.E. (1975).An MMPI Handbook, Volume II: Research Application, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L.R. (1984).The Derogatis stress profile: A summary report. Baltimore, Md: Clinical Psychometric Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L.R., (1983).Administrative, scoring and procedures manual - II, for the R (evised) version and other instruments of the psychopathology rating scale series, 2nd Edition, Towson, Md: Clinical Psychometric Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, H.J., Olkin, R., Herzoff, N., Delancey, M. (1986). MMPI evaluation of erectile dysfunction: Failure of organic vs. psychogenic decision rules.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 752–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, P., Surridge, D., & Delva, N. (1980). Differentiation of organic and psychogenic impotence on the basis of MMPI decision rules.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 407, 408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salkheim, D.K., Barlow, D.H., Abrahamson, D.J., & Beck, J.G. (1987). Distinguishing between organogenic and psychogenic erectile dysfunction.Behavior Research and Therapy, 25, 379–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuegor, J.M., Foerstner, S.B., Serkownek, K., & Ritz, G. (1987). History and validities of the Serkownek subscales for the MMPI Scales 5 and 0.Psychological Reports, 61, 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selzer, M.L., (1971). The Michigan Alcholism Screening Test: The quest for a new diagnostic instrument.American Journal of Psychiatry, 127, 1653–1658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staples, R.B., Ficher, I.V., Shapiro, M., Martin, K., & Gonick, P. (1980). A re-evaluation of MMPI discriminators of biogenic and psychogenic impotence.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 40, 543–545.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perconte, S.T., Griger, M.L. & Bellucci, G. Psychometric evaluation of biogenic versus psychogenic erectile dysfunction. Annals of Sex Research 2, 335–344 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849750

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00849750

Keywords

Navigation