Skip to main content
Log in

Duration of cleavage cycles and asymmetry in the direction of cleavage waves prior to gastrulation inXenopus laevis

  • Published:
Wilhelm Roux's archives of developmental biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The animal and the vegetative side of 15 embryos ofXenopus laevis were studied from the 5th cleavage to gastrulation by means of time-lapse cinematography. The duration of cleavage cycles, defined for the embryo as a whole as the period between the earliest blastomere divisions of one cycle to those of the next, varies quite a lot between individual embryos, both with respect to synchronous and lengthened cycles. Cycle lengthening may start at either cycle 10, 11 or 12. Cycle 13 deviates from the individual rhythm, and moreover its duration is inversely correlated with the period elapsing from the beginning of this cycle to the onset of gastrulation which occurs in cycles 14 or 15. In each cleavage cycle, the regional sequence of first blastomere divisions is visible on films as a “cleavage wave” runming over the animal cap. The direction of the waves varies in different embryos during the synchronous period but begins to change from cycle 10 onwards, resulting in a similar direction in most embryos prior to gastrulation: from the ventral/left to the dorsal/right half. This change reflects an asymmetry in the lengthening of the cycles in the animal cap: more dorsally than ventrally, and more on the right than on the left. The possible significance of the results for the timing of gastrulation and for the pattern of the future embryo is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachvarova R, Davidson EH (1966) Nuclear activation at the onset of amphibian gastrulation. J Exp Zool 163:285–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Boterenbrood EC, Nieuwkoop PD (1973) The formation of the mesoderm in urodelean amphibians. V Its regional induction by the endoderm. Wilhelm Roux Arch 173:319–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachet J, Hubert E, Lievens A (1972) The effects of α-amanitin and rifampicins on amphibian egg development. Rev Suisse Zool (suppl) 79:47–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettlaff TA (1964) Cell divisions, duration of interkinetic states and differentiation in early stages of embryonic development. Adv Morphogen 3:323–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhart JC (1980) Mechanisms regulating pattern formation in the amphibian egg and early embryo. In: Goldberger RF (ed) Biological regulation and cell function, vol 2. Plenum, New York, pp 133–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhart JC, Ubbels G, Black S, Hara K, Kirschner M (1981) A reinvestigation of the role of the grey crescent in axis formation inXenopus laevis. Nature 292:511–516

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hara K (1970) “Double camera” time lapse micro-cinematography: simultaneous filming of both poles of the amphibian egg. Mikroskopie 26:181–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hara K (1977) The cleavage pattern of the Axolotl egg studied by cinematography and cell counting. Wilhelm Roux Arch 181:73–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Hara K, Tydeman P, Kirschner M (1980) A cytoplasmic clock with the same period as the division cycle inXenopus eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:462–466

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner M, Butner KA, Newport JW, Black SD, Scharf SR, Gerhart JC (1981) Spatial and temporal changes in early amphibian development. Neth J Zool 31 (1):50–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore JA (1955) Abnormal combinations of nuclear and cytoplasmic systems in frogs and toads. Adv Genet VII:139–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura O, Takasaki H (1971) Effects of actinomycin on development of amphibian morulae and blastulae, with special reference to the organizer. Proc Jpn Acad 47:92–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Newport J, Kirschner M (1982) A major developmental transition in earlyXenopus embryos. I. Characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. Cell 30:675–686

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwkoop PD (1977) Origin and establishment of embryonic polar axes in amphibian development. Curr Top Dev Biol 11:115–132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Satoh N (1977) Metachronous cleavage and initiation of gastrulation in amphibian embryos. Dev Growth Diff 19:111–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Signoret J (1980) Evidence for the first genetic activity required in axolotl development. In: McKinnell RG, Di Berardino MA, Blumefeld M, Bergad RD (eds) Results and problems in cell differentiation, vol 11, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New Yokr pp 71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Signoret J, Lefresne J (1973) Contribution à l'étude de la segmentation de l'oeuf de l'Axolotl. II Influence de modification de noyau et du cytoplasme sur les modalités de la segmentation. Ann Embryol Morphogen 6:299–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirakami KI (1958) Cyto-embryology of amphibians. In: Dan K and Yamada T (eds) Studies in developmental physiology. Tokyo Baifu-kan (in Japanese), pp 221-264

  • Smith LD, Ecker RE (1970) Uterine suppression of biochemical and morphogenetic events inRana pipiens. Dev Biol 22:622–637

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods. Iowa State Univ Press, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutasurya LA, Nieuwkoop PD (1974) The induction of primordial germ cells in the urodeles. Wilhelm Roux Arch 175:199–220

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boterenbrood, E.C., Narraway, J.M. & Hara, K. Duration of cleavage cycles and asymmetry in the direction of cleavage waves prior to gastrulation inXenopus laevis . Wilhelm Roux' Archiv 192, 216–221 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848652

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848652

Key words

Navigation