Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast carcinoma by technetium-99m sestamibi breast scintigraphy, ultrasound and conventional mammography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Axillary lymph node status is important in the staging of breast carcinoma. To evaluate the accuracy of technetium-99m sestamibi breast scintigraphy in detecting metastatic axillary lymph nodes as compared with other accepted imaging modalities, we performed99mTc-sestamibi breast scintigraphy, conventional mammography and ultrasound in 36 patients with primary untreated breast carcinoma. With histopathology as the gold standard,99mTc-sestamibi breast scintigraphy was found to yield true-positive results in 7 of 11 cases (64%) of axillary lymph node metastases and true-negative results in 18 of 20 cases (90%); it has an accuracy of 81%, a positive predictive value of 77.8% and a negative predictive value of 81.8%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker RR. Preoperative assessment of the patient with breast cancer.Surg Clin North Am 1984; 64: 1039.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fisher ER, Swamidoss S, Lee CH. Detection and axillary significance of occult axillary node metastases.Cancer 1978; 42: 2025.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Merkel DE, Osborne CK. Prognostic factors in breast cancer.Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 1989; 3: 641–652.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kinne DW, Ashikari R, Butler A, Menendez-Botet C, Rosen PP, Schwartz M. Estrogen receptor protein in breast cancer as a predictor of recurrence.Cancer 1981; 47: 2346–2347.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher B, Bauer M, Wickerham L, Redmond C, Fisher E. Relation of number of positive axillary nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer.Cancer 1983; 52: 1551–1557.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Morris PJ, Malt RA.Oxford textbook of surgery. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications; 1994: 815.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Say CC, Donegan W. A biostatistical evaluation of complications from mastectomy.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974; 138: 370.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harris JR, Hellman S, Henderson IC, Kinne DW.Breast diseases, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott; 1991: 361.

    Google Scholar 

  9. American Joint Committee on Cancer.TMN classification. Manual for staging of cancer. 1982. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baker RR. Preoperative assessment of the patient with breast cancer.Surg Clin North Am 1984; 64: 1039.

    Google Scholar 

  11. de Freitas R Jr, Costa MV, Schneider SV, Nicolau MA, Marussi E. Accuracy of ultrasound and clinical examination in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer.Eur J Surg Oncol 1991; 17: 240–244.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mustonen P, Farin P, Kosunen O. Ultrasonographic detection of metastatic axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer.Ann Chir Gynaecol 1990; 79: 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tate JJ, Lewis V, Archer T, Guyer PG, Royle GT, Taylor I. Ultrasound detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer.Eur J Surg Oncol 1989; 15: 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bruneton JN, Caramella E, Hery M, Aubanel D, Manzino JJ, Picard JL. Axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: preoperative detection with US.Radiology 1986; 158: 325–326.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pamilo M, Sovia M, Lavast EM. Real time ultrasound, axillary mammography, and clinical examination in the detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.J Ultrasound Med 1989; 8: 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walsh JS, Dixon JM, Chetty U, Paterson D. Colour Doppler studies of axillary node metastases in breast carcinoma.Clin Rad 1994; 49: 189–191.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Khalkhali I, Mena I, Diggles L. Review of imaging techniques for the diagnosis of breast cancer: a new role of prone scintimammography using technetium-99m sestamibi.Eur J Nucl Med 1994; 21: 357–362.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kao CH, Wang SJ, Liu TJ. The use of technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile breast scintigraphy to evaluate palpable breast masses.Eur J Nucl Med 1994; 21: 432–436.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kao CH, Wang SJ, Yeh SH. Tc-99m MIBI uptake in breast carcinoma and axillary lymph node metastases.Clin Nucl Med 1994; 19: 898–900.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tucker AK.Textbook of mammography. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1993: 42.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bjurstam NG. Radiography of the female breast and axilla.Acta Radiol Diagn Suppl 1978; 357: 107.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marchal G, Oyen R, Verschakelen J, et al. Sonographic appearance of normal lymph nodes.J Ultrasound Med 1985; 4: 417.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yang WT, Ahuja A, Tang A, et al. High frequency ultrasonographic detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer.J Ultrasound Med 1996; (in press).

  24. O'Tuama LA, Packard AB, Treves ST. SPECT imaging of pediatric brain tumour with methoxyisobutylisonitrile technetium.J Nucl Med 1990; 31: 2040–2041.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Aktolun C, Bayhan H, Kir M, et al. Clinical experience with Tc-99m MIBI imaging in patients with malignant tumour: preliminary results and comparison with Tl-201.Clin Nucl Med 1992; 17: 171–176.

    Google Scholar 

  26. O'Driscoll CM, Baker F, Casey MJ, Duffy GJ. Localization of recurrent medullary thyroid carcinomas with technetium-99m-methoxyisobutylnitrile scintigraphy: a case report.J Nucl Med 1991; 32: 2281–2283.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Caner B, Kitapci M, Aras T, Erbengi G, Ugur O, Bekdik C. Increased accumulation hexakis (2-methoxyisobutylisonitrile) technetium in osteosarcoma and its metastatic lymph nodes.J Nucl Med 1991; 32: 1977–1978.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schatten C, Barrada M, Mandeville R, Enzelsberger H, Angelberger P, Czerwenka K, Kubista E, Pateisky N. Combined used of123I-labelled BCD-F9 and 4C4 monoclonal antibody with dissimilar specificity for breast cancer: implication for the detection limit of immunolymphoscintigraphy in the assessment of axillary lymph node metastases.Nucl Med Commun 1994; 15: 422–429.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lamki LM, Buzdar AU, Singletary SE, Rosenblum MG, Bhadkamkar V, Esparza L, Podoloff DA, Zukiwski A, Hortobagyi GN, Murray JL. Indium-111-labeled B72.3 monoclonal antibody in the detection and staging of breast cancer: a phase I study.J Nucl Med 1991; 32: 1326–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tse NY, Hoh CK, Hawkins RA, Zinner MJ, Dahlbom M, Choi Y, Maddahi J, Brunicardi FC, Phelps ME, Glaspy JA. The application of positron emission tomographic imaging with fluorodeoxyglucose to the evaluation of breast disease.Ann Surg 1992; 216: 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tjandra JJ, Sacks NP, Thompson CH, et al. The detection of axillary lymph node metastases from breast cancer by radiolabelled monoclonal antibodies: a prospective study.Br J Cancer 1989; 52: 296–302.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tjandra JJ, Russell IS, Collins JP, Andrews JT, Lichtenstein M, Binns D, McKenzie IF. Immunolymphoscintigraphy for the detection of lymph node metastases from breast cancer.Cancer Res 1989; 49: 1600–1608.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Khalkhali I, Cutrone JA, Mena IG, Diggles LE, Venegas RJ, Vargas HI, Jackson BL, Khalkhali S, Moss JF, Klein SR. Scintimammography: the complementary role of Tc-99m sestamibi prone breast imaging for the diagnosis of breast carcinoma.Radiology 1995; 196: 4212–4216.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lam, W.W.M., Yang, W.T., Chan, Y.L. et al. Detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast carcinoma by technetium-99m sestamibi breast scintigraphy, ultrasound and conventional mammography. Eur J Nucl Med 23, 498–503 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00833382

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00833382

Key words

Navigation