Skip to main content
Log in

Survival and resorptive activity of chick osteoclasts in culture

  • Published:
Anatomy and Embryology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Previous studies have shown that osteoclasts obtained from chopped bones resorb surrogate calcified tissue substrata in vitro. These cultures contained all bone and marrow cell type pooled together. We have now parted the marrow from the bone and cultured the cells from the two fractions separately: on both resorbable substrates and on plastic in order to test their longevity in culture and ability to resorb following trypsinisation.

Marrow-fraction, bone-fraction or whole bone derived cells were harvested from prehatch chick long bone shafts after removing the periosteum; seeded on sperm whale dentine (SWD) slices or plastic dishes and cultured continously, or trypsinised and reseeded on to fresh substrata at weekly or half-weekly intervals. Observations were made by light microscopy and SEM.

Many multinucleate cells were observed in the marrow fraction immediately after settling, deriving presumably from poorly adherent osteoclasts, next to bone, which had not been resorbing at the time of harvesting. By three days in culture on plastic, multinucleate cells were very large both in terms of plant extent and nuclear number: cell fusion occurred between osteoclasts and between osteoclasts and small, round uninuclear cells. SWD was extensively resorbed.

The adherence of the osteoclasts was greater (a) to plasuc upon trypsinisation than that of the other cells; and (b) to SWD than to plastic, particularly if the cells were resorbing. Trypsinised cells regained their resorptive capacity after seeding on to new SWD, but only for 1 or 2 treatments.

Bone derived cells were similar to the marrow cultures, except for the much higher proportion of other bone cell types. Trypsinisation caused a higher proportional loss of multinucleate cells from both SWD and plastic.

Resorption was still occurring at 6 weeks in all cultures. A wide diversity existed in the shapes, depths, plan areas and volumes of the resorption pits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyde A (1984) Methodology of calcified tissue specimen preparation for SEM. In: Dickson GR (ed) Methods of calcified tissue preparation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 251–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyde A, Jones SJ (1979) Estimation of the size of resorption lacunae in mammalian calcified tissues using SEM stereophotogrammetry. Scanning Electron Microscopy/1979/II, SEM Inc-AMF O'Hare, pp 393–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyde A, Jones SJ (1983) Backscattered electron imaging of skeletal tissue. Metab Bone Dis Relat Res 5:145–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyde A, Jones SJ (1985) Bone modelling in the implantation bed. J Biomed Mater Res 19:199–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyde A, Ali NN, Jones SJ (1983) Computer aided measurement of resorbtive activity of isolated osteoclasts. Proc Roy Microsc Soc 18:357 (abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyde A, Ali NN, Jones SJ (1984) Resorption of dentine by isolated osteoclasts in vitro. Brit Dent J 156:216–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyde A, Ali NN, Jones SJ (1985) Optical and scanning electron microscopy in the single osteoclast resorption assay. Scanning Electron microscopy/1985/III, SEM Inc-AMF O'Hare, pp 1259–1271

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger EH, Van der Meer JWM, Van de Gevel JS, Gribnau JC, Thesingh CW, Van Furth R (1982) In vitro formation of osteoclasts from long term cultures of bone marrow mononuclear phagocytes. J Exp Med 156:1604–1614

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers TJ (1985) The pathobiology of the osteoclast. J Clin Pathol 38:241–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambers TJ (1985) The pathobiology of the osteoclast. J Clin Pathol 38:241–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers TJ, Magnus CJ(1982) Calcitonin alters behaviour of isolated osteoclasts. J Pathol 136:27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers TJ, Revel PA, Fuller K, Athanasou NA (1984) Resorption of bone by isolated rabbit osteoclasts. J Cell Sci 66:383–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton MA, Rimmer EF, Chambers TJ (1985) Surface marker and functional characterisation of multinucleate giant cells generated in long term culture of neonatal rabbit bone marrow. Bone [in press — Abstract — Bone and Tooth Soc, London Oct 1985]

  • Jaworski ZFG, Duck B, Sekaly G (1981) Kinetics of osteoclasts and their nuclei in evolving secondary Haversian systems. J Anast 133:397–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones SJ, Boyde A (1977) Some morphological observations on osteoclasts. Cell Tissue Res 185:387–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones SJ, Boyde A, Ali NN (1984) The resorption of biological and non-biological substrates by cultured avian and mammalian osteoclasts. Anat Embryol 170:247–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones SJ, Boyde A, Ali NN, Maconnachie E (1985a) A review of bone cell and substratum interactions. Scanning 7:5–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones SJ, Ali NN, Maconnachie E, Boyde A (1985b) Normal variation in osteoclastic activity. Calcif Tissue Int [Suppl] 38:S5

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones SJ, Maroudas NM, Ali NN, Boyde A (1985c) The development of chemically defined substrata for testing osteoclast function. Calcif Tissue Int [Suppl] 38:S5

  • Loutit JF, Townsend KMS (1982b) Longevity of osteoclasts in radiation chimaeras of beige and osteopetrotic microphthalmic mice. Brit J Exp Pathol63:214–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Loutit JF, Townsend KMS (1982b) Longevity of osteoclasts in radiation chimaeras of osteopetrotic beige and normal mice. Brit J Exp Pathol 63:221–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks SC (1984) Congenital osteopetrotic mutations as probes of the origin, structure, and function of osteoclasts. Clin Orthop 189:239–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks SC, Schneider GB (1982) Transformations of osteoclast phenotype in a rats cured of congenital osteopetrosis. J Morphol 174:141–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks SC, Walker DG (1981) The hematogenous origin of osteoclasts: Experimental evidence from osteopetrotic (microphthalmic) mice treated with spleen cells from beige mouse donors. Am J Anat 161:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Osdoby P, Martini MC, Caplan AI (1982) Isolated osteoclasts and their presumed progenitor cells, the monocyte, in culture. J Exp Zool 224:331–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider GB (1985) Cellular specificity of the cure for osteopetrosis: isolation and treatment with pluripotent hemopoietic stem cells. Bone 6:241–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Spooncer E, Dexter TM (1984) Long term bone marrow cultures. Bibl Haematologica, no. 48. Karger, Basel, pp 366–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Suda T, Testa NG, Allen TD, Onions D, Jarrett O (1983) Effect of hydrocortisone on osteoclasts generated in cat bone marrow cultures. Calcif Tissue Int 35:82–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambonin-Zallone A, Teti A, Primavera MV (1982) Isolated osteoclasts in primary culture: first observations on structure and survival in culture media. Anat Embryol 165:405–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambonin-Zallone A, Teti A, Primavera MV (1984) Resorption of vital or devitalized bone by isolated osteoclasts in vitro. Cell Tissue Res 235:561–564

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, S.J., Ali, N.N. & Boyde, A. Survival and resorptive activity of chick osteoclasts in culture. Anat Embryol 174, 265–275 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00824342

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00824342

Key words

Navigation