Summary
Laboratory experiments were designed to study differential susceptibility of nine species of slugs to metaldehyde/bran and to methiocarb baits. Differential susceptibility was found between some of the species for each type of bait, both immediately after baiting and also after a 48 h recovery period. Thus neither type of bait is suitable for use in ecological investigations. This conclusion was supported by evidence that interspecific behavioural interactions occurred when metaldehyde, but not methiocarb, baits were used.
At the same time the relative efficiency of the two types of baits as molluscicides was estimated. Methiocarb was shown to be a better molluscicide because, not only did it initially poison more slugs than did metaldehyde, but also a number of the slugs initially poisoned by metaldehyde recovered during the following 48 h period, whereas this did not happen with methiocarb. The similarity between these results and those obtained from field experiments by other workers is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnes, H. F., Weil, J. W.: Baiting slugs using metaldehyde mixed with various substances. Ann. appl. Biol.29, 56–68 (1942)
Bruel, Van den, W. E., Moens, R.: Remarques sur les facteurs écologiques influençant l'efficacité de la lutte contre les Limaces. Parasitica (Gembloux)14, 135–147 (1958).
Carrick, R.: The Grey Field slugAgriolimax agrestis L., and its environment. Ann. appl. Biol.29, 43–55 (1942).
Cragg, J. B., Vincent, M. H.: The action of metaldehyde on the slugAgriolimax reticulatus (Müller). Ann. appl. Biol.39, 392–406 (1952).
Dainton, B. H.: The activity of slugs. I. The induction of activity by changing temperatures. J. exp. Biol.31, 165–187 (1954).
Gale, J. S.: Competition between three lines ofDrosophila melanogaster. Heredity19, 681–699 (1964).
Hunter, P. J.: The distribution and abundance of slugs on an arable plot in Northumberland. J. Anim. Ecol.35, 543–557 (1966).
Hunter, P. J.: Studies on slugs of arable ground. III. Feeding habits. Malacologia6, 391–399 (1968).
Martin, T. J., Davis, M. E., Morris, D. B.: Development work with methiocarb in Great Britain. Proc 5th Br. Insectic. Fungic. Conf. (1969)2, 434–441 (1969).
—, Forrest, J. D.: Zur Entwicklung von Schneckenkorn®Mesurol (®Draza) in Großbritannien. Pflanzenschutz-Nachr. „Bayer”22, 212–253 (1969).
Newell, P. F.: The measurement of light and temperature as factors controlling the surface activity of the slugAgriolimax reticulatus (Müller), p. 141–146. In: R. M. Wadsworth (ed.). The measurement of environmental factors in terrestrial ecology. Oxford: Blackwell 1968.
South, A.: Biology and ecology ofAgriolimax reticulatus (Müll.) and other slugs: spatial distribution. J. Anim. Ecol.34, 403–417 (1965).
Thomas, D. C.: Discussion on slugs. II. Field sampling for slugs. Ann. appl. Biol.31, 163–164 (1944).
—: The use of metaldehyde against slugs. Ann. appl. Biol.35, 207–227 (1948).
Webley, D.: Experiments with slug baits in South Wales. Ann. appl. Biol.50, 129–136 (1962).
—: Experiments with slug baits in 1959. Pl. Path.12, 19–20 (1963).
—: Slug activity in relation to weather. Ann. appl. Biol.53, 407–414 (1964).
—: Aspects of trapping slugs with metaldehyde and bran. Ann. appl. Biol.56, 37–45 (1965).
Reference
Kendall, M. G., Stuart, A.: The Advanced Theory of Statistics, vol. 2, pp. 580–584. London: Griffin (1961).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crawford-Sidebotham, T.J. Differential susceptibility of species of slugs to metaldehyde/bran and to methiocarb baits. Oecologia 5, 303–324 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00815497
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00815497