Skip to main content
Log in

Differential susceptibility of species of slugs to metaldehyde/bran and to methiocarb baits

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Laboratory experiments were designed to study differential susceptibility of nine species of slugs to metaldehyde/bran and to methiocarb baits. Differential susceptibility was found between some of the species for each type of bait, both immediately after baiting and also after a 48 h recovery period. Thus neither type of bait is suitable for use in ecological investigations. This conclusion was supported by evidence that interspecific behavioural interactions occurred when metaldehyde, but not methiocarb, baits were used.

At the same time the relative efficiency of the two types of baits as molluscicides was estimated. Methiocarb was shown to be a better molluscicide because, not only did it initially poison more slugs than did metaldehyde, but also a number of the slugs initially poisoned by metaldehyde recovered during the following 48 h period, whereas this did not happen with methiocarb. The similarity between these results and those obtained from field experiments by other workers is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes, H. F., Weil, J. W.: Baiting slugs using metaldehyde mixed with various substances. Ann. appl. Biol.29, 56–68 (1942)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruel, Van den, W. E., Moens, R.: Remarques sur les facteurs écologiques influençant l'efficacité de la lutte contre les Limaces. Parasitica (Gembloux)14, 135–147 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrick, R.: The Grey Field slugAgriolimax agrestis L., and its environment. Ann. appl. Biol.29, 43–55 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cragg, J. B., Vincent, M. H.: The action of metaldehyde on the slugAgriolimax reticulatus (Müller). Ann. appl. Biol.39, 392–406 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dainton, B. H.: The activity of slugs. I. The induction of activity by changing temperatures. J. exp. Biol.31, 165–187 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, J. S.: Competition between three lines ofDrosophila melanogaster. Heredity19, 681–699 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, P. J.: The distribution and abundance of slugs on an arable plot in Northumberland. J. Anim. Ecol.35, 543–557 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, P. J.: Studies on slugs of arable ground. III. Feeding habits. Malacologia6, 391–399 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. J., Davis, M. E., Morris, D. B.: Development work with methiocarb in Great Britain. Proc 5th Br. Insectic. Fungic. Conf. (1969)2, 434–441 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Forrest, J. D.: Zur Entwicklung von Schneckenkorn®Mesurol (®Draza) in Großbritannien. Pflanzenschutz-Nachr. „Bayer”22, 212–253 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P. F.: The measurement of light and temperature as factors controlling the surface activity of the slugAgriolimax reticulatus (Müller), p. 141–146. In: R. M. Wadsworth (ed.). The measurement of environmental factors in terrestrial ecology. Oxford: Blackwell 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, A.: Biology and ecology ofAgriolimax reticulatus (Müll.) and other slugs: spatial distribution. J. Anim. Ecol.34, 403–417 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. C.: Discussion on slugs. II. Field sampling for slugs. Ann. appl. Biol.31, 163–164 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: The use of metaldehyde against slugs. Ann. appl. Biol.35, 207–227 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • Webley, D.: Experiments with slug baits in South Wales. Ann. appl. Biol.50, 129–136 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Experiments with slug baits in 1959. Pl. Path.12, 19–20 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Slug activity in relation to weather. Ann. appl. Biol.53, 407–414 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Aspects of trapping slugs with metaldehyde and bran. Ann. appl. Biol.56, 37–45 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

Reference

  • Kendall, M. G., Stuart, A.: The Advanced Theory of Statistics, vol. 2, pp. 580–584. London: Griffin (1961).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crawford-Sidebotham, T.J. Differential susceptibility of species of slugs to metaldehyde/bran and to methiocarb baits. Oecologia 5, 303–324 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00815497

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00815497

Keywords

Navigation