Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quality of mental health service care: the forgotten pathway from process to outcome

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The validity of the concept of outcome depends on a relationship between routine treatment and later health status. Outcome evaluations and audits are very rare in psychiatry. A substantial expansion in epidemiologically based, naturalistic, observational, process-outcome data collection in routine psychiatric practice is essential in order to identify treatment allocation biases and other reasons for unexpected outcomes. Identified causes of undertreatment should lead to locally agreed detailed clinical guidelines. Experimental evaluation should take place in routine clinical practice settings, with change in both process and outcome as the objective. Ultimately, the results of both experimental and observational outcome studies on representative service users should converge, permitting outcomes to be the ultimate arbitrator of quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England and Wales (1992) Minding the quality. Audit Commission, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beerham J, Knapp M (1992) Casting psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft G, Brewin CR, Wing J (eds) Measuring mental health needs. Gaskell, London, pp 163–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewin CR, Wing JK (1993) The MRC Needs for Care Assessment: progress and controversies. Psychol Med 23:837–841

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewin CR, Wing JK, Mangen SP, Brugha TS, MacCarthy B (1987) Principles and practice of measuring needs in the long-term mentally ill: the MRC Needs for Care Assessment. Psychol Med 17:971–981

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewin C, Wing J, Mangen S, Brugha T, MacCarthy B, Lesage A (1988) Needs for care among the long-term mentally ill: a report from the Camberwell High Contact Survey. Psychol Med 18:457–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook RH (1977) Quality-can we measure it? N Engl J Med 296:170–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugha TS (in press) Depression undertreatment: lost cohorts, lost opportunities. Psychol Med

  • Brugha TS, Bebbington PE (1992) The undertreatment of depression. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 242:103–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugha TS, Lindsay F (1994) Quality outcomes in Psychiatry—back-ground and policy development. A report for Leicestershire Mecial health Services

  • Brugha TS, Wing JK, Smith B (1989) Physical health of the long-term mentally ill in the community: is there unmet need? Br J Psychiatry 155:777–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugha TS, Bebbington PE, MacCarthy B, Sturt E, Wykes T (1992) Antidepressives may not work in practice: a naturalistic prospective survey. Acta Psychiatr Scand 86:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahn C, Richman A (1985) Quality assurance in psychiatry. Can J Psychiatry 30:148–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross Design Synthesis: a new strategy for medical effectiveness research (1992) Report no. B244808 Washington D.C., US GAO

  • Daly OE (1991) Reading about ... medical audit. Psychiatr Bull 15: 209–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Datta M (1993) You cannot exclude the explanation you have not considered. Lancet 342:345–347

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLacey G (1992) What is audit? Why should we be doing it? Hosp Update June: 458–466

  • Department of Health (1989) Working for patients. Medical audit. Working paper 6. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Depression Guideline Panel (1993) Depression in primary care, vol 2. Treatment of major depression. Clinical practice guideline number 5. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for health Care Policy and Research. AHCPR publication no. 93-0551, Rockville M. D.

  • Donabedian A (1966) Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Memorial Fund Q 44:166–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Donabedian A (1989) The end results of health care: Ernest Codman' contribution to quality assessment and beyond. Milbank Q 67:233–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Donabedian A (1992) The role of outcomes in quality assessment and assurance. Qual Rev Bull 18:356–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood PM (1988) Outcomes management: a technology of patient experience. N Engl J Med 318:1549–1556

    Google Scholar 

  • Everitt BS (1989) Statistical methods for medical investigations. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauman MA (1989) Quality assurance monitoring in psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 146:1121–1130

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauman MA (1990) Monitoring the quality of psychiatric care. In: Soreff S. Uttermohlen D (eds) Psychiatr Clin North Am 13:73–88

  • Feldman MM (1992) Audit in psychotherapy: the concept of Kaizen. Psychiatr Bull 16:334–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessel WJ, Van Brunt EE (1972) Assessing quality of care from the medical record. N Engl J Med 286:134–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Garden G, Oyebode F, Cumella S (1989) Audit in psychiatry. Psychiatr Bull 13:278–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Gath A (1991) Audit. Psychiatr Bull 15:23–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill M (1993) Purchasing for quality: still in the starting blocks? Quality Health Care 2:179–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick ID, Showstack JA, Cohen C, Klar HM (1989) Between patient and doctor. Improving the quality of care for serious mental illness. Bull Menninger Clin 53:193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw JM, Russell IT (1993) Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 342:1317–1322

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatton P, Renvoize EB (1991) Psychiatric audit. Psychiatr Bull 15:550–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawton K (1987) Assessment of suicide risk. Br J Psychiatry 150:145–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman C (1989) Medical audit in psychiatry. Psychiatr Bull 13:281–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton R (1993) Data-proof practice. Lancet 342:1499–1500

    Google Scholar 

  • Ierodiakonou K, Vandenbroucke JP (1993) Medicine as a stochastic art. Lancet 347:542–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacyna MR (1992) Audit assesses quality: but what is quality? A clinician's view. Hosp Update November: 822–824

  • Janca A, Chandrashekar CR (1993) Catelogue of assessment instruments used in the studies co-ordinated by the WHO Mental Health Programme. WHO/MNH/92.5, Geneva

  • Jenkins R (1990) Towards a system of outcome indicators for mental health care. Br J Psychiatry 177:500–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupfer DJ, Freeman DX (1986) Treatment for depression. ‘Standard’ clinical practice as an unexamined topic. Arch Gen Psychiatry 43: 509–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancet (editorial) (1993) Dicing with death rates. Lancet 341:1183–1184

    Google Scholar 

  • Last JM (ed) (1988) A dictionary of epidemiology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire P, Roe P, Goldberg D, Jones S, Hyde C, O'Dowd T (1978) The value of feedback in teaching interviewing skills to medical students. Psychol Med 8:695–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Mental Health Act Commission (1993) Mental Health Act Commission; fifth biennial report 1991–1993. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Micossi P, Carbone M, Stancanelli G, Fortino A (1993) Measuring products of health care systems. Lancet 341:1566–1567

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland R (1992) The quality issue. Psychiatr Bull 16:411–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan HG, Priest P (1991) Suicide and other unexpected deaths among psychiatric in-patients. Br J Psychiatry 158:368–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz JM (1993) Why reports of outcome evaluations are often biased or uninterpretable. Eval Program Plann 16:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss F, Smith R (1991) From audit to quality and beyond. BMJ 303: 199–200

    Google Scholar 

  • NHS Management Executive (1992) Assessing the effects of health technologies. Department of Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Quality Assurance Project (1983) A treatment outline for depressive disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 17:129–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson M (1991) Medical audit: basic principles and current methods. Psychiatr Bull 15:21–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers WH, Wells KB, Meredith KB, Sturm R, Burnham A (1993) Outcomes for adult outpatients with depression under prepaid or fee-for-service financing. Arch Gen Psychiatry 50:517–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy D (1991) Setting up district audit meetings in psychiatry. Psychiatr Bull 15:417–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of Psychiatrists (1989) Preliminary report on medical audit. Psychiatr Bull 13:577–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of Psychiatrists (1991) Good medical practice in the aftercare of potentially violent or vulnerable patients discharged from in-patient psychiatric treatment. Royal College of Psychiatrists, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutz W, Von Knorring L, Walinder J (1992) Long-term effects of an educational program for general practitioners given by the Swedish Committee for the Prevention and Treatment of Depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand 85:83–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster J (1991) Ensuring highest quality care for the cost: coping strategies for mental health providers. Hosp Community Psychiatry 42:774–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea MT, Elkin I, Imber SD, Sotsky SM et al (1992) Course of depressive symptoms over follow up: findings from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Arch Gen Psychiatry 49:782–787

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon T, Borowitz M (1993) Changing the measure of quality in the NHS: from purchasing activity to purchasing protocols. Quality Health Care 2:149–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd G (1988) Evaluation and service planning. In: Lavender A, Holloway F (eds) Community care in practice. Wiley, Chichester, pp 91–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibley JC, Spitzer WO, Rudnick KV, Bell JD, Bethune RD, Sackett DL, Wrigh K (1975) Quality of care appraisal in primary care: a quantitative method. Ann Intern Med 83:46–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking B (1992) Promoting change in clinical care. Quality Health Care 1:56–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarlov AR, Ware JE, Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M (1989) The medical outcomes study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA 262:925–930

    Google Scholar 

  • Tugwell P (1979) A methodological perspective on process measures of the quality of medical care. Clin Invest Med 2:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner WE (1989) Quality care comparisons in medical/surgical and psychiatric services. Administration Policy Ment Health 17:79–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells KB, Brook RH (1988) The quality of mental health services: past present and future. Plenum: London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells KB, Burnam MA, Rogers W, Hays R, Camp P (1992) The course of depression in adult outpatients. Results from the medical outcomes study. Am J Psychiatry 49:788–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson JW (1971) Evaluating quality of patient care. JAMA 218: 564–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing JK (1992) Epidemiologically-based mental health needs assessements. Review of research on psychiatric disorders (ICD-10, F2–F6). Royal College of Psychiatrists Research Unit (Mimeo), London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright EC (1993) Non compliance—or how many aunts has Matilda? Lancet 342:909–913

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Sciences Building, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University of Leicester, PO Box 65, LE2 7LX, Leicester, UK

    T. S. Brugha & F. Lindsay

Authors
  1. T. S. Brugha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Lindsay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brugha, T.S., Lindsay, F. Quality of mental health service care: the forgotten pathway from process to outcome. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 31, 89–98 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00801904

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00801904

Keywords

Search

Navigation