Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

QALYs and mental health care

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality-adjusted life year measures (QALYs) have been fervently debated by researchers and decision makers concerned with resource allocation in the health care sector. They have been heralded as important aids to planning and priority setting, but also criticised on technical and ethical grounds. This paper examines these arguments with special reference to mental health care, the intention being to highlight the strengths and shortcomings of QALYs in this context. Issues pertinent to the application of QALYs in health care evaluation more generally are also reviewed. Whilst the rationale and underlying principles of the utility measurement approach are sound, the generic QALY as it is currently constructed represents an insensitive measure of the outcomes of mental health care. In the event of an increasingly QALY-driven priority-setting environment, however, abandonment of QALYs runs the risk of inappropriately marginalising people with mental illnesses in the resource allocation process. This opens up the possibility of developing a mental-health specific measure of utility that, in combination with cost data, would provide useful and appropriate summary information across treatments and programmes of mental health care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson TF, Mooney G (1990) The challenges of medical practice variations. Macmillan Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Angst J (1992) The epidemiology of depression. Psychopharmacology 106 [Suppl]:71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Boevink WA, Wolf JR, Van Nieuwenhuizen C, Schene AH (1995) Quality of life of psychiatric patients who depend on long-term outpatient care: a conceptual exploration. Tijdschr Psychiatrie 37:97–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling A (1991) Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurement scales. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan D (1994) Setting mental health priorities: problems and possibilities. Milbank Q 72:451–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr-Hill R (1989) Background material for the workshop on QALYs: assumptions of the QALY procedure. Soc. Sci Med 28:469–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Culyer A, Wagstaff A (1993) QALYs versus HYEs. Health Econ 12:311–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon J, Welch GH (1991) Priority setting: lessons from Oregon. Lancet i 337:891–894

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson C, Atkinson A, Bond J, Wright KG (1988) Should QALYs be programme specific? J Health Econ 7:239–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (1987) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond MF, Mohide EA, Tew M, Streiner DL, Pringle DM, Gilbert RJ (1991) Economic evaluation of a support program for caregivers of demented elderly. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 7:209–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar G, Stoker M (1992) The development of a questionnaire to measure quality of life in psychiatric patients. Br J Med Econ 4:63–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy DM (1991) Oregon's methods — did cost-effectiveness analysis fail? J Am Med Assoc 266:2135–2141

    Google Scholar 

  • EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol — a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16:199–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Gafni A, Birch S, Mehrez A (1993) Economics, health and health economics: HYEs versus QALYs. J Health Econ 12:325–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard K, Mooney G (1992) QALY league tables: handle with care. Health Econ 2:59–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg DP (1978) Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. NFER-Nelson, Windsor

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadorn DC (1991) Setting health care priorities in Oregon — cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescue. J Am Med Assoc 265:2218–2225

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton M (1967) Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 6:278–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatziandreu EJ, Brown RE, Revicki DA, Turner R, Martindale JJ, Levine S, Siegel JE (1994) Cost-utility of maintenance treatment of recurrent depression with sertraline versus episodic treatment with dothiepin. Pharmacoeconomics 5:249–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt S, McKenna S (1992) Do we need measures other than QALYs? In: Hopkins A (ed) Measures of the quality of life and the uses to which such measures may be put. Royal College of Physicians, London, pp 63–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley P (1986) Quality Measurement in Mental Health Services. Good Practices in Mental Health, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson M, Jönsson B (1991) Economic evaluation in health care: is there a role for cost-benefit analysis? Health Policy 17:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamlet MS, Wade M, Kupfer DJ, Frank E (1992) Cost-utility analysis of maintenance treatment for recurrent depression: a theoretical framework and numerical illustration. In: Frank RG, Manning WG (eds) Economics and mental health. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 267–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh S, Stewart A (1995) Economic evaluations of mental health care: modes and methods. In: Knapp MRJ (ed) The economic evaluation of mental health care. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 27–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh S, Schneider J, Knapp MRJ, Beecham JK, Netten A (1995) Elderly people with dementia: costs, effectiveness and balance of care. In: Knapp MRJ (ed) The economic evaluation of mental health care. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 125–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman A (1983) The well-being of chronic mental patients: assessing their quality of life. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:369–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman A (1995) Measuring quality of life in a reformed health system. Health Aff 14:90–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomes G, McKenzie L (1989) The use of QALYs in health care decision making. Soc Sci Med 28:299–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason J, Drummond M, Torrance G (1993) Some guidelines on the use of cost-effectiveness league tables. BMJ 306:570–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrez A, Gafni A (1989) Quality adjusted life years and healthy year equivalents. Med Decis Making 9:142–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohide EA, Torrance GW, Streiner DL, Pringle DM, Gilbert R (1988) Measuring the wellbeing of family caregivers using the time trade-off technique. J Clin Epidemiol 41:475–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray CJL (1994) Quantifying the burden of disease: the technical basis for disability-adjusted life years. Bull WHO 72:429–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Nord E (1992) Methods for quality adjustment of life years. Soc Sci Med 34:559–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver JPJ (1993) The social care directive: development of a quality of life profile for use in community services for the mentally ill. Soc Work Soc Sci Rev 3:5–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack DA, McFarland BH, George RA, Angell RH (1994) Prioritisation of mental health services in Oregon. Milbank Q 72:515–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser R, Kind P (1978) A scale of valuation of states of illness: is there a social consensus? Int J Epidemiol 7:347–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser R, Watts VC (1972) The measurement of hospital output. Int J Epidemiol 1:361–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Selai C, Rosser R (1993) The role of quality of life measurement in psychiatry. Curr Med Lit Psychiatry 4:67–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance GW (1986) Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 5:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagstaff A (1991) QALYs and the equity-efficiency trace-on. J Health Econ 10:21–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson G, Croft-Jeffreys C, Krekorian H, McLees S, Falloon I (1990) QALYs in psychiatric care? Psychiatr Bull 14:582–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson G, Williams B, Krekorian H, McLees S, Falloon I (1992) QALYs in mental health: a case study. Psychol Med 22:725–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams A (1994) Economics, QALYs and medical ethics: a health economist's perspective. Discussion Paper No. 121, Centre for Health Economics, University of York

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. M. Knapp (Health Economics and Director of CEMH, and Professorial Fellow)

    Present address: Centre for the Economics of Mental Health (CEMH), Institute of Psychiatry, University of London, 7 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, SE5 8BB, London, UK

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for the Economics of Mental Health (CEMH), Institute of Psychiatry, University of London, 7 Windsor Walk, Denmark Hill, SE5 8BB, London, UK

    D. Chisholm & A. Healey

  2. Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), London School of Economics, London, UK

    M. Knapp (Health Economics and Director of CEMH, and Professorial Fellow)

Authors
  1. D. Chisholm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Healey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Knapp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chisholm, D., Healey, A. & Knapp, M. QALYs and mental health care. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 32, 68–75 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00788923

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00788923

Keywords

Search

Navigation