Skip to main content
Log in

Interactionin vitro of the neurofilament triplet proteins from porcine spinal cord with natural RNA and DNA

  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neurofilaments were isolated from porcine spinal cord and separated into their subunit proteins (68 Kd NFP, 145 Kd NFP, 200 Kd NFP) by ion exchange chromatography on DEAE-cellulose in 6 M urea. The individual proteins were reacted with total rRNA from Ehrlich ascites tumor cells and the reaction products analysed by sucrose gradient centrifugation at low ionic strength and in the presence of EDTA. All three proteins interacted with rRNA with a preference for 18S rRNA. Competition experiments with native and heat-denatured calf thymus DNA showed that the affinities of the 68 Kd and 145 Kd NFPs were considerably higher for denatured DNA than for rRNA and that native DNA was only a weak competitor. The binding of the 200 Kd NFP to rRNA was unaffected by native and by denatured DNA. When denatured DNA was reacted with a mixture of the 68 Kd and 145 Kd NFPs, the two proteins interacted independently with the nucleic acid, giving rise to two different populations of deoxyribonucleoprotein particles. This segregation is the result of the cooperative interaction of the neurofilament proteins with single-stranded DNA. It could not be observed with rRNA or bacteriophage MS2 RNA. The results clearly show that the 68 Kd and 145 Kd NFPs are single-stranded RNA- and DNA-binding proteins, whereas the 200 Kd NFP seems to be only a single-stranded RNA-binding protein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wuerker, R. B. & Kirkpatrick, J. B., 1972. Int. Rev. Cytol. 33: 45–75.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoffman, P. N. & Lasek, R. J., 1975. J. Cell Biol. 66: 351–366.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderton, B. H., 1981. J. Muscle Res. Cell Mot. 2: 141–166.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Franke, W. W., Schmid, E., Schiller, D. L., Winter, S., Jarasch, E. D., Moll, R., Denk, H., Jackson, B. W. & Illmensee, K., 1982. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 46: 431–453.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lazarides, E., 1982. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 51: 219–250.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Osborn, M., Geisler, N., Shaw, G., Sharp, G. & Weber, K., 1982. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 46: 413–429.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hodge, A. J. & Adelman, W. J., 1980. J. Ultrastr. Res. 70: 220–241.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rice, R. V., Roslansky, P. F., Pascoe, N. & Houghton, S. M., 1980. J. Ultrastr. Res. 71: 303–310.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lasek, R. J. & Hoffman, P. N., 1976. In Cell Motility (Goldman, R., Pollard, T. & Rosenblum, J., eds.) Vol. 3, pp. 1021–1049. Cold Sring Harbor Laboratories, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Black, M. M. & Lasek, R. J., 1980. J. Cell Biol. 86: 616–623.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gawlitta, W., Osborn, M. & Weber, K., 1981. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 26: 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klymkowsky, M. W., 1981. Nature (Lond.) 291: 249–251.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klymkowsky, M. W., Miller, R. H. & Lane, E. B., 1983. J. Cell Biol. 96: 494–509.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, J. J.-C. & Feramisco, J. R., 1981. Cell 24: 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Traub, P. & Nelson, W. J., 1983. Molec. Biol. Rep. 8: 239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Traub, P. & Nelson, W. J., 1983. Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 364: 575–592.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Traub, P., Nelson, W. J., Kühn, S. & Vorgias, C. E., 1983. J. Biol. Chem. 258: 1456–1466.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Delacourte, A., Filliatreau, G., Boutteau, F., Biserte, G. & Shrevel, J., 1980. Biochem. J. 191: 543–546.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Geisler, N. & Weber, K., 1981. J. Mol. Biol. 151: 565–571.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Egberts, E., Hackett, P. B. & Traub, P., 1976. Hoppe-Seyler's Z. Physiol. Chem. 357: 1779–1792.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Geisler, N. & Weber, K., 1982. EMBO J. 1: 1649–1656.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Quax-Jeuken, Y. E. F. M., Quax, W. J. & Bloemendal, H., 1983. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 80: 3548–3552.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Quax, W., Egberts, W. V., Hendriks, W., Quax-Jeuken, Y. & Bloemendal, H., 1983. Cell 35: 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Geisler, N. & Weber, K., 1983. EMBO J. 2: 2059–2063.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Traub, P. & Vorgias, C. E., 1983. J. Cell Sci. 63: 43–67.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Geisler, N., Kaufmann, E., Fischer, S., Plessmann, U. & Weber, K., 1983. EMBO J. 2: 1295–1302.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Traub, P. & Vorgias, C. E., 1984. J. Cell Sci. 65: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Julien, J.-P. & Mushynski, W. E., 1981. J. Neurochem. 37: 1579–1585.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shecket, G. & Lasek, R. J., 1982. J. Biol. Chem. 257: 4788–4795.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Julien, J.-P. & Mushynski, W. E., 1982. J. Biol. Chem. 257: 10467–10470.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jones, S. M. & Williams, R. C. Jr., 1982. J. Biol. Chem. 257: 9902–9905.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schlaepfer, W. W. & Micko, S., 1979. J. Neurochem. 32: 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schlaepfer, W. W., Zimmerman, U.-J. P. & Micko, S., 1981. Cell Calcium 2, 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Leterrier, J.-F., Liem, R. K. H. & Shelanski, M. L., 1981. J. Cell Biol. 90: 755–760.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Runge, M. S., El-Maghrabi, M. R., Claus, T. H., Pilkis, S. J. & Williams, R. C. Jr., 1981. Biochemistry 20: 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schlaepfer, W. W. & Hasler, M. B., 1979. Brain Res. 168: 299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nelson, W. J. & Traub, P., 1983. Mol. Cell Biol. 3: 1146–1156.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schlaepfer, W. W., 1983. In ‘Biological aspects of Alzheimer's disease’ (Katzman, R., ed), Banbury Report 15, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, pp. 107–113.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Traub, P., Vorgias, C.E. & Nelson, W.J. Interactionin vitro of the neurofilament triplet proteins from porcine spinal cord with natural RNA and DNA. Mol Biol Rep 10, 129–136 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00778517

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00778517

Keywords

Navigation