Skip to main content
Log in

A smoothed bootstrap estimator for a studentized sample quantile

  • Bootstrapping
  • Published:
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

If the underlying distribution functionF is smooth it is known that the convergence rate of the standard bootstrap quantile estimator can be improved fromn −1/4 ton −1/2+ε, for arbitrary ε>0, by using a smoothed bootstrap. We show that a further significant improvement of this rate is achieved by studentizing by means of a kernel density estimate. As a consequence, it turns out that the smoothed bootstrap percentile-t method produces confidence intervals with critical points being second-order correct and having smaller length than competitors based on hybrid or on backwards critical points. Moreover, the percentile-t method for constructing one-sided or two-sided confidence intervals leads to coverage accuracies of ordern −1+ε, for arbitrary ε>0, in the case of analytic distribution functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azzalini, A. (1981). A note on the estimation of a distribution function and quantiles by a kernel method,Biometrika,68, 326–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, D. A. and Gastwirth, J. L. (1968). On a simple estimate of the reciprocal of the density function,Ann. Math. Statist.,39, 1083–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csörgö, M. (1983).Quantile Processes with Statistical Applications, SIAM, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife,Ann. Statist.,7, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, M. (1983). Relative efficiency and deficiency of kernel type estimators of smooth distribution functions,Statistica Neerlandica,37, 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, M. (1986). On the estimation of the quantile density function,Statist. Probab. Lett.,4, 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, M. (1990). Weak convergence of the maximum error of the bootstrap quantile estimate,Statist. Probab. Lett.,10, 301–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, M. and Janas, D. (1992). Edgeworth expansions for studentized and prepivoted sample quantiles with applications to confidence intervals,Statist. Probab. Lett.,14, 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, M. and Kaufmann, E. (1991). Coverage probabilities of bootstrap-confidence intervals for quantiles,Ann. Statist.,19, 485–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, M. and Reiss, D. (1989a). Weak convergence of smoothed and nonsmoothed bootstrap quantile estimates,Ann. Probab.,17, 362–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, M. and Reiss, D. (1989b). Bootstrapping the distance between smooth bootstrap and sample quantile distribution,Probab. Theory Related Fields,82, 177–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1986). On the bootstrap and confidence interval,Ann. Statist.,14, 1431–1452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1988). Theoretical comparison of bootstrap confidence intervals,Ann. Statist.,16, 927–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (1991). Edgeworth expansions for nonparametric density estimators, with applications,Statistics,22, 215–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and Martin, M. A. (1988). Exact convergence rate of bootstrap quantile variance estimator,Probab. Theory Related Fields,80, 261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and Martin, M. A. (1989). A note on the accuracy of bootstrap percentile method confidence intervals for a quantile,Statist. Probab. Lett.,8, 197–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and Martin, M. A. (1991). On the error incurred using the bootstrap variance estimate when constructing confidence intervals for quantiles,J. Multivariate Anal.,38, 70–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and Sheather, S. J. (1988). On the distribution of a studentized quantile,J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B,50, No. 3, 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., DiCiccio, T. J. and Romano, J. P. (1989). On smoothing and the bootstrap,Ann. Statist.,17, 692–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janas, D. (1988). Weak convergence, rate of convergence of the sample quantile prepivoted by the smoothed bootstrap, Diplom thesis, University of Siegen (in German).

  • Jones, M. C. (1990). The performance of kernel density functions in kernel distribution function estimation,Statist. Probab. Lett.,9, 129–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parzen, E. (1979). Nonparametric statistical data modeling,J. Amer. Statist. Assoc.,7, 105–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakasa Rao, B. L. S. (1983).Nonparametric Functional Estimation, Academic Press, Orlando.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, R.-D. (1981). Nonparametric estimation of smooth distribution functions,Scand. J. Statist.,8, 116–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, R.-D. (1989).Approximate Distributions of Order Statistics (with Applications to Nonparametric Statistics), Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, M. M. (1960). Distribution of quantiles in samples from a bivariate population,J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards B,64, 45–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B. W. (1986).Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K. (1981). On the asymptotic accuracy of Efron's bootstrap,Ann. Statist.,9, 1187–1195.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Janas, D. A smoothed bootstrap estimator for a studentized sample quantile. Ann Inst Stat Math 45, 317–329 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00775817

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00775817

Key words and phrases

Navigation