Skip to main content
Log in

The homogeneity of the universe

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The observational and philosophical grounds for our belief in the spatial homogeneity of the universe, are reconsidered. On the one hand, spatial homogeneity cannot be directly verified observationally, and, on the other hand, it raises a series of philosophical problems that counter its attractiveness to a considerable degree. It is pointed out that there are several possible alternative approaches to the question of the homogeneity of the universe that may provide at least as attractive a philosophical basis as the current approach and that merit detailed investigation as possible alternative bases for our cosmological world view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weinberg, S. (1972).Gravitation and Cosmology (Wiley, New York); Hawking, S. W., and Ellis, G. F. R. (1973).The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ellis, G. F. R., and Sciama, D. W. (1972). “Global and non-global problems in cosmology,” inStudies in Relativity, ed. O'Raifeartaigh, L. (Oxford University Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ellis, G. F. R. (1975). “Cosmology and verifiability,”Quart. J. R. Astron. Soc.,16, 245–264.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ellis, G. F. R. (1979). “Limits to verification in cosmology,” to appear,Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.

  5. Ellis, G. F. R. (1978). “Is the universe expanding?,”Gen. Rel. Grav.,9, 87–94; Ellis, G. F. R., Maartens, R., and Nel, S. (1978). “The expansion of the universe,”Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.,154, 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Vaucouleurs, G. (1970). “The case for a hierarchical cosmology,”Science,167, 1203–1213.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Peebles, P. J. E. (1972). “Light out of darkness vs order out of chaos,”Comments Astrophys. Space Phys.,4, 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dicke, R. H., and P. J. E. Peebles (1979). “The big bang cosmology-enigmas and nostrums,” inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, ed. Hawking, S. W., and Israel, W. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Penrose, R. (1964). “Conformal treatment of infinity,” inRelativity, Groups and Topology, ed. de Witt, B., and de Witt, C. (Gordon and Breach, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Misner, C. W. (1968). “The isotropy of the universe,”Astrophys. J.,151, 431–457; Misner, C. W. (1969). “Mixmaster universe,”Phys. Rev. Lett.,22, 1071–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  11. MacCallum, M. A. H. (1979). “Anisotropic and inhomogeneous relativistic cosmologies,” inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, ed. Hawking, S. W., and Israel, W. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barrow, J. D., and Matzner, R. A. (1977). “The homogeneity and isotropy of the universe,”Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.,181, 719–727.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ellis, G. F. R., and Brundrit, G. B. (1979). “Life in the infinite universe,”Quart. J. R. Astron. Soc.,20, 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dicke, R. H. (1961). “Dirac's cosmology and Mach's principle,”Nature,192, 440–441; Carter, B. (1974). “Large number coincidences and the anthropic principle in cosmology,” inConfrontation of cosmological theory with observation, ed. Longair, M. S. (Reidel, Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Collins, C. B., and Hawking, S. W. (1973). “Why is the universe isotropic?,”Astrophys. J.,180, 317–334.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carr, B. J., and Rees, M. J. (1979). “The anthropic principle and the structure of the physical world,”Nature,278, 605–612.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Penrose, R. (1979). “Singularities and time asymmetry,” inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, ed. Hawking, S. W., and Israel, W. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jones, B. J. T., and Peebles, P. J. E. (1972). “Chaos in cosmology,”Comments Astrophys. Space Phys.,4, 121–128; Silk, J. (1973). “The case for a chaotic cosmology,”Comments Astrophys. Space Phys.,5, 9–14; Barrow, J. D. (1977). “A chaotic cosmology,”Nature,267, 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ellis, G. F. R. (1971). “Topology and cosmology,”Gen. Rel. Grav.,2, 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Einstein, A. (1917). “Cosmological considerations on the general theory of Relativity,” inThe Principle of Relativity, H. A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski, H. Weyl (Dover, New York); Einstein, A. (1950).The meaning of relativity (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey), pp. 107–108.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wheeler, J. A. (1968).Einstein's vision (Springer, Berlin).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ellis, G. F. R., and Sciama, D. W. (1966). “On a class of model universe satisfying the Perfect Cosmological Principle,” inPerspectives in Geometry and Relativity, ed. Hoffmann, B. (Indiana University Press, Bloomington); MacCallum, M. A. H., and Ellis, G. F. R. (1970). “A class of homogeneous cosmological models. II: Observations,”Commun. Math. Phys.,19, 31–64.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This essay received the first award from the Gravity Research Foundation for the year 1979.-Ed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ellis, G.F.R. The homogeneity of the universe. Gen Relat Gravit 11, 281–289 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00759562

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00759562

Keywords

Navigation