Skip to main content
Log in

Creep and stress relaxation of rubbers—the effects of stress history and temperature changes

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two factors which affect the creep and stress relaxation of rubbers at room temperature are discussed.

The rate of relaxation in filled rubbers is dependent on the previous mechanical history of the specimen. Pre-stressing a rubber reduces the subsequent relaxation rate and this reduction is for most purposes permanent. Recovery can, however, be induced by swelling and deswelling the specimen.

A rise in temperature during a relaxation experiment is accompanied by a marked, short term, acceleration of the relaxation. The creep which this produces is not recovered when the temperature is reduced to its original level. The magnitude of the extra relaxation from this effect is greatest if the cycle occurs in the early stages of relaxation and also greatest during the first such cycle.

Both the effects are of importance in any consideration of the molecular nature of relaxation, and indicate that a simple network theory of viscoelasticity is inadequate. The effects are also of practical significance in that both of these factors should be well understood if laboratory testing is to be used for predicting the service behaviour of rubber components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CBS:

N-cyclohexyl-benzthiazole-2-sulphenamide

Nonox D:

phenyl-β-naphthylamine

Nonox ZA:

4-isopropylamino diphenyl-amine

Nonox HFN:

arylamine blend

References

  1. A. N. Gent, “Relaxation processes in vulcanized rubber,”J. Appl. Polymer. Sci. 6 (1962) 22, 433.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. J. Derham, Proceedings International Rubber Conference, Brighton (1972) F1.1.

  3. C. J. Derham, E. Southern, andA. G. Thomas,Proc. Intl. Rubb. Conf. Moscow (1969); reprinted in NRPRA NR Technology Part 2 (1970).

  4. L. Mullins andN. R. Tobin,Proc. 3rd. Rubb. Technol. Conf., London (1954) 397.

  5. E. H. Andrews,Rubb. Chem. and Tech. 36 (1963) 325.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. J. Derham, unpublished work.

  7. C. J. Derham andP. B. Lindley, Proc. 5th Intl. conf. on Fluid Sealing. (British Hydromechanic Research Association, Coventry, 1971) C1.1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. J. Derham andA. G. Thomas,Nature (Lond.) 218 (1968) 81.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. A. C. Harwood, L. Mullins, andA. R. Payne,J. Inst. Rubb. Ind. 1 (1967) 17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Derham, C.J. Creep and stress relaxation of rubbers—the effects of stress history and temperature changes. J Mater Sci 8, 1023–1029 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00756634

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00756634

Keywords

Navigation