Abstract
A clinical sample of 76 children in a day and residential treatment facility was administered the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD) at time of admission. Interviews with therapists enabled identification of students who had been sexually abused prior to admission. A comparison group of children who had not been sexually abused was selected to match age, grade level and gender of the sexually abused children. ANOVA yielded significant differences on the dimensions of problem-solving, roles, and general functioning, with the direction of the effect indicating greater pathology among the sexually abused group. Analyses of differences between victims of intrafamilial or extrafamilial abuse yielded significance in affective responsivity, affective involvement, and general functioning, with greater enmeshment and dysfunction reported by the victims of intrafamilial abuse. Some gender differences were also noted, with females reporting greater general dysfunction in their families. Implications of this research as supportive of current clinical beliefs about family functioning are offered.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bessett, L. (1985, February).Child victims: Evaluating, understanding, and treating sexually abused children. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of Social Workers, Washington, D. C.
Blumberg, M. L. (1978). Child sexual abuse: Ultimate in maltreatment syndrome.New York State Journal of Medicine, 78, 612–616.
Courtois, C., & Sprei, J. (1988). Retrospective incest therapy for women. In L. Walker (Ed.),Handbook on child sexual abuse. New York: Springer.
Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster family assessment device.Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, (2), 171–180.
Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S., & Baldwin, L. M. (1982). McMaster model of family functioning: A view of the normal family. In F. Walsh (Ed.),Normal family processes. New York: Guilford Press.
Finkelhor, D. (1984).Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York: The Free Press.
Finkelhor, D., & Hotaling, G. (1984). Sexual abuse in the National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect: An appraisal,Child Abuse and Neglect, 8, 15–24.
Herman, J. (1981).Father-daughter incest. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Herman, J., & Hirschman, L. (1977). Father-daughter incest.Signs, 2, 735–756.
Josselson, R. E. (1987, January).Treating adolescent girls in therapy. Paper delivered at the Regional Institute for Children and Adolescents, Rockville, MD.
Lusk, R. & Waterman, J. (1986). Effects of sexual abuse on children. In K. Macfarlane & J. Waterman (Eds.),Sexual abuse of young children New York: Guilford, pp. 101–118.
Mrazek, P. B., & Bentovim, A. (1981). Incest and the dysfunctional family system. In P. B. Mrazek & C. H. Kempe (Eds.),Sexually-abused children and their families. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Saunders, B. E., Murphy, S. M., & McClure, S. M. (1987, March).Assessment of family structure variables of cases in intra-familial child sexual abuse. Paper presented at the American Orthopsychiatric Association Conference, Washington, D. C.
Scott, R. L., & Stone, D. A. (1986). MMPI profile constellations in incest families.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 364–368.
Summit, R. C., & Kryso, J. (1978). Sexual abuse of children: A clinical spectrum.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 48, 237–250.
Waterman, J. (1986). Family dynamics of incest with young children. In K. MacFarlane & J. Waterman (Eds.),Sexual abuse of young children. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 204–219.
Zuelzer, M. B., & Reposa, R. E. (1983). Mothers in incestuous families.International Journal of Family Therapy, 5, 98–110.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoagwood, K., Stewart, J.M. Sexually abused children's perceptions of family functioning. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 6, 139–149 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00756113
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00756113