Skip to main content
Log in

The role ofAzolla in curbing ammonia volatilization from flooded rice systems

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By the year 2020, an additional 300 million tons of rice are needed annually to meet the demands of a growing population. If our natural resource base is to be preserved, intensification strategies should rely on integrated nutrient management, making full use of biological nitrogen fixation. TheAzolla-Anabaena complex is amongst the most effective systems of fixing nitrogen. In this paper we present evidence from greenhouse studies on the potential ofAzolla to curb the volatilization of NH3 following the application of urea to a mixedAzolla-rice culture, providing a new incentive for developing ways of integratingAzolla in intensive rice cultivation systems.

The results of a series of short term greenhouse experiments show that a full cover ofAzolla can significantly reduce losses of applied urea-N from 45 and 50% to 20 and 13% for the 30 and 60 kg N ha−1 treatments, respectively. About one-quarter of the applied N was tied up in theAzolla biomass. The applied N inhibitedAzolla growth as well as the amount of N fixed. Inoculation with smaller quantities ofAzolla allowing for more vigorousAzolla multiplication was equally effective in reducing NH3 volatilization and doubled the amount of15N tied-up byAzolla. The reduction in NH3 volatilization is largely related to the depression byAzolla of the floodwater pH, which in its absence may reach values between 9 and 10 as a result of algal activity.

Early rice growth responded positively to urea as well as the large quantities of appliedAzolla and increased the yield potential of the crop. Smaller quantities ofAzolla alone were not effective in this regard. The conservation of fertilizer N byAzolla, particularly when it fully covered the water, was reflected in a synergistic effect on rice dry matter production, amounting to 9% at the 30 kg N rate and 16% at the 60 kg N rate. In all likelihood this interaction is attributable to the higher efficiency of the applied N. The benefits ofAzolla in conserving basal urea-N even in small quantities (200-500 kg fresh material ha−1), outweighed competition for the applied N and may be as important as its BNF. The most promising integratedAzolla/rice management systems emerging from our studies should be given further attention under field conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bremner J M and Mulvaney C S (1992) Nitrogen-total.In: Page A L (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Agronomy No 9, Part 2. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • De Datta S K, Fillery I R P and Craswell E T (1983) Results from recent studies on nitrogen fertilizer efficiency in wetland rice. Outlook Agric. 12: 125–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Denmead O T, Freney J R and Simpson J R (1983) Dynamics of NH3 volatilization during furrow irrigation of maize. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47: 618

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillery I R P and Vlek P L G (1986) Reappraisal of the significance of NH3 volatilization as a N loss mechanism in flooded rice fields. Fert. Res. 9: 79–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeck T, Alkämper J and Watanabe I (1988a) Effect of anAzolla cover on the conditions in floodwater. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 161: 185–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeck T, Alkämper J and Watanabe I (1988b) Temperature regime ofAzolla under rice. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 161: 316–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulasoorya S A (1991) Constraints for the widespread use ofAzolla in rice production.In: Polsinelli, Matarassi and Vincenzini (eds.) Nitrogen fixation. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumarasinghe K S and Eskew D L (1993) Isotopic Studies ofAzolla and Nitrogen Fertilization of Rice. Kluwer Acad. Publ. Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumarasinghe K S, Zapata F, Kovacs G, Eskew D L and Danso S K A (1986) Evaluation of the availability ofAzolla and urea to rice using15N. Plant Soil 90: 293–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Manna A B and Singh P K (1989) Rice yields as influenced byAzolla N2 fixation and urea-N fertilization. Plant Soil 114: 63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Reineking A, Langel R and Schikowski J (1993)15N,13C-on-line measurements with an elemental analyser (Carlo-Erba, NA 1500), a modified trapping box and a gas isotope mass spectrometer (Finnigan, MAT 251). Isotopenpraxis Environ Health Stud. 29: 169–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A L and Singh P K (1986) Comparative studies on different methods ofAzolla utilization in rice culture. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 107: 273–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhauser C (1992) Auswirkungen verschiedener Gründüngungsverfahren mitAzolla auf Reiserträge in Asien. (The effect of different green manure systems withAzolla on rice-yield levels in Asia). M. Sc. Thesis. Inst. Agron. Tropics Univ. Goettingen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Tel-Or E, Rozen A, Ofir Y, Kobiler D and Schönfeld M (1991) Metabolic relations and intercellular signals in theAzolla-Anabaena association. Isr. J. Bot. 40: 171–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hove C (1989)Azolla and its multiple uses with emphasis on Africa. FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hove C, Diara H F and Godard P (1983)Azolla in West Africa. WARDA Publ., Bouaké, Côte d'Ivoire

    Google Scholar 

  • Villegas G (1985) Effect ofAzolla cover on nitrogen in flooded Maahas clay. M. Sc. Thesis, University of the Philippines, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlek P L G, Hong C W and Youngdahl L J (1979) An analysis of N nutrition on yield and yield components for the improvement of rice fertilization in Korea. Agron. J. 71: 829–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlek P L G and Craswell E T (1981) NH3 volatilization from flooded soils. Fert. Res. 2: 247–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlek P L G and Byrnes B H (1986) The efficacy and loss of fertilizer N in lowland rice. Fert. Res. 9: 131–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlek P L G and Fillery I R P (1984) Improving nitrogen efficiency in wetland rice soils. The Fertilizer Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlek P L G, Fugger W and Biker U (1992) The fate of fertilizer N underAzolla in wetland rice. Proc. 2nd ESA Congress, Warwick Univ. UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe I and Liu C C (1992) Improving nitrogen-fixing systems and integrating them into sustainable rice farming. Plant Soil 141: 57–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe I (1987) Summary report of theAzolla programmes of the International Network on Soil Fertility Evaluation for Rice.In:Azolla Utilization: 197–205. IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe I, Lee K K, Alimagno V B, Sato M, Del Rosario D C and De Guzman M R (1977) Biological nitrogen fixation in paddy field studies byin-situ acetylene-reduction assays. IRRI Res. Pap. Ser. 3: 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe I, Bai K Z, Berja N S, Espina C R, Ito O and Subidhi R P R (1981) TheAzolla-Anabaena complex and its use in rice culture. IRRI Res. Pap. Ser. 69:

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vlek, P.L.G., Diakite, M.Y. & Mueller, H. The role ofAzolla in curbing ammonia volatilization from flooded rice systems. Fertilizer Research 42, 165–174 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00750511

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00750511

Key words

Navigation