Skip to main content
Log in

Nutrition response of Norway spruce and willow to varying levels of calcium and aluminium

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decreased forest tree growth has often been attributed to increasing soil acidification, especially from high concentrations of soluble Al3+ and low base saturation. The growth of willow cuttings (Salix viminalis L. 78183) and Norway spruce seedlings (Picea abies L. Karst) were measured in a greenhouse in the presence of variable Ca2+ at uniform NH +4 concentrations. Sets of willows were grown in sand culture, one watered with Ingestad's nutrient solution (INS, pH 5.4) and the other watered with acidified Ingestad's nutrient solution (NSA, pH 3.8). Three levels of Ca2+ and Al3+ concentrations (in NSA only) were established for all nutrient solutions. Sets of Norway spruce seedlings were grown in calcareous sand and watered with INS, one of pH 5.4 and the other of pH 2.1 (resulting in two Ca2+ concentrations after acid neutralization by CaCO3). In the field, observations were made on the correlation of naturally occurring soil solution Al3+ and Ca2+ to spruce needle Al, Ca2+ and N concentrations. In the willow studies, both the above- and below-ground biomass were negatively influenced by the presence of Al3+. Aluminium decreased the growth of rooted cuttings (more in roots than shoots), reduced the uptake of N, Ca2+, Mg2+ and P, significantly lowered the weight of fine roots, and caused overall reductions of tissue nutrient concentrations. As Al3+ concentrations increased, increased concentrations of Ca2+ were needed by the willow to help ameliorate the effects of Al3+. In field samples of spruce needles and soil, CAB (CAB = Log10 Ca2+ /Al3+) was positively correlated with N concentration. From a combination of greenhouse and field studies the mechanisms for Ca2+ amelioration of Al3+ toxicity in trees appear to be i) the effect of Ca2+ on reduced absorption of Mn2+ and Al3+, ii) the effects of Ca2+ on NH +4 and P absorption, iii) and the stimulation of tree growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alva AK, Edwards DG, Asher CJ and Blamey FPC (1986) Effects of phosphorus/aluminum molar ratio and calcium concentration on plant response to aluminum toxicity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50: 133–137

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson F (1989) Air pollution impact on Swedish forests - Present evidence and future development. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 12: 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bengtsson B, Asp A, Jensen P and Berggren D (1988) Influence of aluminum on phosphate and calcium uptake in beech (Fagus sylvatica) grown in nutrient solution and soil solution. Physiol Plant 74: 299–305

    Google Scholar 

  4. Epstein E (1961) The essential role of calcium in selective cation transport by plant cells. Plant Physiol 36: 437–444

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fenn LB, Miyamoto S and Gobran G (1987) Guayule seedling response to nitrogen fertilizers. Fert Res 11: 113–121

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fenn LB, Taylor RM and Horst GL (1987)Phaseolus vulgaris growth in an ammonium-based nutrient solution with variable calcium. Agron J 79: 89–91

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fenn LB, Taylor RM and Pety Jr CA (1987) Stimulative effects of elemental sulfur in the presence of ammonium on chile and broccoli growth in calcareous soils. J Plant Nutr 10: 2263–2281

    Google Scholar 

  8. Foy CD (1978) The physiology of metal toxicity in plants. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 29: 511–566

    Google Scholar 

  9. Horst GL, Fenn LB and Beadle NB (1985) Bermudagrass turf responses to nitrogen sources. J Am Soc Hort Sci 110: 759–761

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ingestad T (1979) Mineral nutrient requirements ofPinus sylvestris andPicea abies seedlings. Plant Physiol 45: 373–380

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ingestad T and Kähr M (1985) Nutrition and growth of coniferous seedlings at varied relative nitrogen addition rate. Physiol Plant 65: 109–116

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobson L, Moore DP and Hannapel RJ (1959) Role of calcium in absorption of monvalent cations. Plant Physiol 35: 352–358

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kinraide TB and Parker DR (1987) Cation amelioration of aluminum toxicity in wheat. Plant Physiol 83: 546–551

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kramer PJ and Kozlowski TT (1960) Physiology of Trees. McGraw-Hill Book Co. New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Krasaesindhu P and Sims JL (1972) Response of rice to nitrogen and calcium nutrition. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 37: 457–460

    Google Scholar 

  16. Noble AD and Sumner ME (1988) Calcium and aluminum interactions and soybean growth in nutrient solutions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 19: 1119–1131

    Google Scholar 

  17. Persson H (1979) Fine-root production, mortality and decomposition in forest ecosystem. Vegetation 41: 101–109

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rhue RD and Grogan CO (1977) Screening corn for aluminum tolerance. In: Wright MJ and Ferrari SA (eds) Plant Adaptation to Mineral Stress in Problem Soils, pp 297–310. Special publ Cornell Univ Agric Exp Stn, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roberts TM, Skeffington RA and Blank LW (1989) Cause of type I spruce decline in Europe. Forestry 62: 179–222

    Google Scholar 

  20. Statistical Analysis System (SAS) Institute Inc. SAS users guide: Statistics. Version 5th Edition. Cary, NC

  21. Sucoff E, Thornton FC and Joslin JD (1990) Sensitivity of tree sandlings to aluminum: I. Honeylocust. J Environ Qual 19: 163–171

    Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor RM, Fenn LB and Horst GL (1985) The influence of calcium on growth of selected vegetable species in the presence of ammonium nitrogen. J Plant Nutr 8: 1013–1023

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ulrich B (1983) Soil acidity and its relation to acid deposition In: Ulrich B and Pankrath J (eds) Effects of Accumulation of Air Pollutants in Forest Ecosystems, pp 126-146. D. Reidel Publishing Company

  24. Van Praag HJ, Weissen F, Sougnez-Remy S and Carletti G (1985) Aluminum effects on spruce and beach seedlings. II. Statistical analysis of sand culture experiments. Plant Soil 83: 339–356

    Google Scholar 

  25. Viets Jr. F (1944) Calcium and other polyvalent cations as accelerators of ion accumulation by excised barley roots. Plant Physiol 19: 466–480

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao X, Sucoff E and Stadelmann EJ (1987) Al3+ and Ca2+ alterations of membrane permeability ofQuercus rubra root cortex cells. Plant Physiol 83: 159–162

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zoette HW (1983) Zur frageder toxischen Wirkung von Aluminum auf Pflanzen. Alig Forstz 38: 206–208

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gobran, G.R., Fenn, L.B., Persson, H. et al. Nutrition response of Norway spruce and willow to varying levels of calcium and aluminium. Fertilizer Research 34, 181–189 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00750113

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00750113

Key words

Navigation