Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of the binding specificity ofAnguilla anguilla agglutinin (AAA) in comparison toUlex europaeus agglutinin I (UEA-I)

  • Glycoconjugate Journal
  • Published:
Glycoconjugate Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using immunochemical and immunohistochemical methods, the binding site ofAnguilla anguilla agglutinin (AAA) was characterized and compared with the related fucose-specific lectin fromUlex europaeus (UEA-I). In solid-phase enzyme-linked immunoassays, the two lectins recognized Fucα1-2Galβ-HSA. AAA additionally cross-reacted with neoglycolipids bearing lacto-N-fucopentaose (LNFP) I [H type 1] and II [Lea] and lactodifucotetraose (LDFT) as glycan moieties. UEA-I, on the other hand, bound to a LDFT-derived neoglycolipid but not to the other neoglycolipids tested. Binding of AAA to gastric mucin was competitively neutralized by Lea-specific monoclonal antibodies. UEA-I binding, on the other hand, was reduced after co-incubation with H type 2- and Ley-specific monoclonal antibodies. According to our results, AAA reacts with fucosylated type 1 chain antigens, whereas UEA-I binds only to the α1-2-fucosylated LDFT-derived neoglycolipid. In immunohistochemical studies, the reactivity of AAA and UEA-I in normal pyloric mucosa from individuals with known Lewis and secretor status was analysed. AAA showed a broad reaction in the superficial pyloric mucosa from secretors and non-secretors, but AAA reactivity was more pronounced in Le(a+b-) individuals. On the other hand, UEA-I stained the superficial pyloric mucosa only from secretor individuals. A staining of deep mucous glands by the lectins was found in all specimens. Both reacted with most human carcinomas of different origin. Slight differences in their binding pattern were observed and may be explained by the different fine-specificities of the lectins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liener IE, Sharon N, Goldstein IJ (1986)The Lectins. Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Damjanov I (1987)Lab Invest 57: 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Walker RA (1989)Path Res Pract 185: 826–35.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Watkins WM, Morgan WTJ (1952)Nature 169: 825–26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Springer GF, Desai PR, Kolecki BJ (1964)Biochemistry 3: 1076–85.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Springer GF, Desai PR (1970)Vox Sang 18: 551–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Springer GF, Desai PR (1971)Biochemistry 10: 3749–61.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baldo BA, Uhlenbruck G (1973)Immunology 25: 649–61.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cazal P, Lalaurie M (1952)Acta Haematol 8: 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Matsumoto I, Osawa T (1969)Biochim Biophys Acta 194: 180–89.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pereira MEA, Kisailus EC, Gruezo F, Kabat EA (1978)Arch Biochem Biophys 185: 108–15.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hindsgaul O, Norberg T, LePendu J, Lemieux RU (1982)Carbohydrate Res 109: 109–42.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pereira MEA, Kabat EA (1974)Biochemistry 13: 3184–92.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Petryniak J, Goldstein IJ (1986)Biochemistry 25: 2829–38.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Baldus SE, Thiele J, Charles A, Hanisch FG, Fischer R (1994)Histochemistry 102: 205–11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ito M, Takata K, Saito S, Aoyagi T, Hirano H (1985)Histochemistry 83: 189–93.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bara J, Mollicone R, Herrero-Zabaleta E, Gautier R, Daher N, Oriol R (1988)Int J Cancer 41: 683–89.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bara J, Daher N, Mollicone R, Oriol R (1987)Rev Fr Transfus Hemobiol 30: 685–92.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mollicone R, Cailleau A, Imberty A, Gane P, Perez S, Oriol R (1996)Glycoconjugate J, in press.

  20. Rouger P, Anstee D, Salmon C (1987)Blood Transfus Immunohaematol 30: 355–720.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hanisch FG, Auerbach B, Bosslet K, Kolbe K, Karsten U, Nakahara Y, Ogawa T, Uhlenbruck G (1993)Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler 374: 1083–91.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hanisch FG, Uhlenbruck G, Dienst C, Stottrop M, Hippauf E (1985)Eur J Biochem 149: 323–30.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stoll MS, Hounsell EF, Lawson AM, Chai W, Feizi T (1990)Eur J Biochem 189: 499–507.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cromer R, Spohr U, Khare DP, LePendu J, Lemieux RU (1991)Can J Chem 70: 1511–30.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Du MH, Spohr U, Lemieux RU (1994)Glycoconjugate J 11: 443–61.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lemieux RU, LePendu J, Hindsgaul O (1979)Jpn J Antibiot 32(Suppl: S21-S31.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mollicone R, Bara J, LePendu J, Oriol R (1985)Lab Invest 53: 219–27.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mollicone R, Le Pendu J, Bara J, Oriol R (1986)Glycoconjugate J 3: 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lloyd KO (1987)Am J Clin Pathol 87: 129–39.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Clausen H, Hakomori S (1989)Vox Sang 56: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Singhal AK (1991)Sem Cancer Biol 2: 379–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baldus, S.E., Thiele, J., Park, YO. et al. Characterization of the binding specificity ofAnguilla anguilla agglutinin (AAA) in comparison toUlex europaeus agglutinin I (UEA-I). Glycoconjugate J 13, 585–590 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00731446

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00731446

Keywords

Navigation