Skip to main content
Log in

Which fluorophore is brightest? A comparison of the staining obtained using fluorescein, tetramethylrhodamine, lissamine rhodamine, texas red, and cyanine 3.18

  • Published:
Histochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

There are several red-emitting fluorophores available for immunofluorescence studies, including tetramethylrhodamine, lissamine rhodamine, Texas Red, and cyanine 3.18; however, it is unclear which of these is best. The present study compared the brightness of these fluorophores to that of fluorescein. Staining was attempted using a primary antibody raised against serotonin and a secondary antibody that was conjugated with either fluorescein or one of the red fluorophores. The intensity of staining was determined densitometrically. It was found that a conjugate of cyanine 3.18 provided significantly brighter staining that conjugates of any of the other fluorophores, including fluorescein. It is concluded that cyanine 3.18 should be useful for multicolor fluorescence experiments and that it may be the brightest fluorophore available for single-color fluorescence immunocytochemistry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold W, von Mayersbach H (1972) Changes in the solubility of immunoglobulins after fluorescent labeling and its influence in immunofluorescent techniques. J Histochem Cytochem 20:975–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentivoglio M, Kuypers HGJM, Catsman-Berrevoets CE, Dann O (1979) Fluorescent retrograde neuronal labeling in rat by means of substances binding specifically to adenine-thymine rich DNA. Neurosci Lett 12:235–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentivoglio M, Kuypers HGJM, Catsman-Berrevoets CE, Loewe H, Dann O (1980) Two new fluorescent retrograde neuronal tracers which are transported over long distances. Neurosci Lett 18:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee D, Baines MG (1976) Immunofluorescence using dichlorotriazinylaminofluorescein (DTAF). I. Preparation and fractionation of labelled IgG. J Immunol Methods 13:305–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandtzaeg P (1975) Rhodamine conjugates: specific and nonspecific binding properties in immunohistochemistry. Ann NY Acad Scienc 254:35–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown KT (1974) Physiology of the retina. In: Mountcastle VB (ed) Medical physiology, 3rd edn. C.V. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 458–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlström A, Fuxe K (1964) Evidence for the existence of monoamine-containing neurons in the central nervous system. I. Demonstration of monoamines in the cell bodies of brain stem neurons. Acta Physiol Scand 62 (Suppl. 232):1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBiasio R, Bright GR, Ernst LA, Waggoner AS, Taylor DL (1987) Five-parameter fluorescence imaging: wound healing of living Swiss 3T3 cells. J Cell Biol 105:1613–1622

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen PA (1967) Spectral data of fluorescent tracers. Acta Histochem (Suppl) 7:167–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans W, Schuit HRE, Teiko Y, Schechter I (1972) An immunofluorescence study on the specificity of antibodies synthesized in separate cells after the administration of an immunogen with double specificity. Eur J Immunol 2:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiramoto R, Berneck J, Jurand J, Hamilin M (1964) The effect of hydrogen ion concentration on fluorescent labelled antibodies. J Histochem Cytochem 12:271–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Holborow EJ, Johnson GD (1967) Immunofluorescence. In: Weir DM (ed) Handbook of experimental immunology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 571–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GD, Nogueira Araujo GMdC (1981) A simple method of reducing the fading of immunofluorescence during microscopy. J Immunol Methods 43:349–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis VJ, Brooks HB (1964) Comparison of fluorochromes for the preparation of fluorescent-antibody reagents. J Bacteriol 88:1520–1521

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay IC, Forman D, White RG (1981) A comparison of fluorescein isothiocyanate and lissamine rhodamine (RB200) as labels for antibody in the fluorescent antibody technique. Immunology 43:591–602

    Google Scholar 

  • Maley B, Elde R (1982) Immunohistochemical localization of putative neurotransmitters within the feline nucleus tractus solitarii. Neuroscience 7:2469–2490

    Google Scholar 

  • Mujumdar RB, Ernst LA, Mujumdar SR, Lewis CJ, Waggoner AS (1992a) Cyanine dye labeling reagents: Sulfoinocyanine succinimidyl esters. Bioconj Chem (submitted)

  • Mujumdar RB, Ernst LA, Mujumdar SR, Chao J, Wagner M, Waggoner AS (1992b) Antibody labeling with multicolor fluorescent cyanine dyes. Cytometry (submitted)

  • Nederlof PM, Robinson D, Abuknesha R, Wiegant J, Hopman AHN, Tanke HJ, Raap AK (1989) Three-color fluorescence in situ hybridization for the simultaneous detection of multiple nucleic acid sequences. Cytometry 10:20–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederlof PM, Flier S van der, Wiegant J, Raap AK, Tanke HJ, Ploem JS, Ploeg M van der (1990) Multiple fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytometry 11:126–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploem JS (1971) A study of filters and light sources in immunofluorescent microscopy. Ann NY Acad Sci 177:414–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmued LC, Fallon JH (1986) Fluoro-Gold: a new fluorescent retrograde axonal tracer with numerous unique properties. Brain Res 377:147–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmued LC, Swanson LW, Sawchenko PE (1982) Some fluorescent counterstains for neuroanatomical studies. J Histochem Cytochem 30:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwick PL, Ernst LA, Tauriello EW, Parker SR, Mujumdar RB, Mujumdar SR, Clever HA, Waggoner AS (1990) Cyanine dye labeling reagents — carboxymethylindolecyanine succinimidyl esters. Cytometry 11:418–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Staines WA, Meister G, Melander T, Nagy JI, Hökfelt T (1988) Three-color immunofluorescence histochemistry allowing triple labeling within a single section. J Histochem Cytochem 36:145–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephanini M, De Martino C, Zamboni L (1967) Fixation of ejaculated spermatozoa for electron microscopy. Nature 216:173–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashiro T, Ruda MA (1988) Immunocytochemical identification of axons containing coexistent serotonin and substance P in the cat lumbar spinal cord. Peptides 9:383–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus JA, Haugland R, Sharrow SO, Segal DM (1982) Texas Red, a hydrophilic, red-emitting fluorophore for use with fluorescein in dual parameter flow microfluorometric and fluorescence microscopic studies. J Immunol Methods 50:193–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessendorf MW (1990) Characterization and use of multi-color fluorescence microscopic techniques. In: Bjorklund A, Hökfelt T, Wouterlood FG, Pol AN van den (eds) Analysis of neuronal microcircuits and synaptic interactions. Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy, vol 8. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessendorf MW (1991) Fluoro-Gold: composition, and mechanism of uptake. Brain Res 553:135–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessendorf MW, Appel NM, Molitor TW, Elde RP (1990) A method for immunofluorescent demonstration of three coexisting neurotransmitters in rat brain and spinal cord, using the fluorophores fluorescein, Lissamin rhodamine, and 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin-3-acetic acid. J Histochem Cytochem 38:1859–1877

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wessendorf, M.W., Brelje, T.C. Which fluorophore is brightest? A comparison of the staining obtained using fluorescein, tetramethylrhodamine, lissamine rhodamine, texas red, and cyanine 3.18. Histochemistry 98, 81–85 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00716998

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00716998

Keywords

Navigation