Abstract
The model of the world proposed by Whitehead provides a natural theoretical framework in which to imbed quantum theory. This model accords with the ontological ideas of Heisenberg, and also with Einstein's view that physical theories should refer nominally to the objective physical situation, rather than our knowledge of that system. Whitehead imposed on his model the relativistic requirement that what happens in any given spacetime region be determined only by what has happened in its absolute past, i.e., in the backward light-cone drawn from that region. This requirement must be modified, for it is inconsistent with the implications of quantum theory expressed by a generalized version of Bell's theorem. Revamping the causal spacetime structure of the Whitehead-Heisenberg ontology to bring it into accord with the generalized Bell's theorem creates the possibility of a nonlocal causal covariant theory that accords with the statistical prediction of quantum theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. S. Bell,Physics 1, 195 (1964); and inFoundations of Quantum Mechanics (Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi International Summer School, Course IL) (Academic Press, New York).
H. P. Stapp, Correlation Experiments and the Nonvalidity of Ordinary Ideas About the Physical World, Berkeley Preprint 1968 and LBL-5333;Phys. Rev. D 3, 1303 (1971); Are Superluminal Connections Necessary,Nuovo Cimento (1977), to be published; J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne,Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974); N. Herbert,Am. J. Phys. 43, 315 (1975); A. Aspect,Phys. Rev. 14D, 1944 (1976); G. Lochak,Found. Phys. 6, 173 (1976); P. H. Eberhard,Nuovo Cimento (1977), to be published; N. Herbert and J. Karush, Generalization of Bell's Theorem,Found. Phys., to be published.
N. Bohr,Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1934);Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Wiley, New York, 1958);Essays 1958/1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Wiley, New York, 1963).
H. P. Stapp,Am. J. Phys. 40, 1098 (1972);Phys. Rev. D 3, 1303 (1971); The Pragmatic Interpretation of Quantum Theory, LBL 759 (App. A).
J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundation of Quantum Theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1955).
G. Ludwig,Z. Phys. 152, 98 (1958); and inWerner Heisenberg und die Physik unserer Zeit (Braunschweig, Vieweg, 1961).
E. Wigner, inThe Scientist Speculates, I. J. Good, ed., (W. Heinemann, London, 1961).
H. Everett III,Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957).
H. Everettet al., inThe Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Theory, B. DeWitt and N. Graham, eds. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1973).
H. P. Stapp, Foundations of S-Matrix Theory: Theory and Experiment, LBL 759 (Rev.); D. Iagolnitzer,The S Matrix (Holland Press, 1978).
A. N. Whitehead,Process and Reality (Macmillan, New York, 1929).
W. Heisenberg,Physics and Philosophy (Harper, New York, 1958).
H. P. Stapp,Nuovo Cimento 29, 270 (1975);Found. Phys. 7,313 (1977).
K. Godël, inAlbert Einstein, Philosopher-Physicist, P. A. Schilpp, ed., (Tudor Publishing Co., New York, 1951).
J. M. Burgers,Rev. Mod. Phys. 35, 145 (1963).
A. Shimony, inQuantum Physics and the Philosophy of A. N. Whitehead (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II), R. S. Cohen and M. Wartofsky, eds. (Humanities Press, New York, 1965).
W. Heisenberg,Daedalus 87, 95 (1958), p. 99.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Based on lectures given at the University of Texas, March–May 1977. This work was supported in part by the United States Energy Research and Development Agency, in part by the University of Texas, and in part by CERN.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stapp, H.P. Whiteheadian approach to quantum theory and the generalized Bell's theorem. Found Phys 9, 1–25 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00715049
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00715049