Skip to main content
Log in

Adoption of agroforestry practices: a case study from Andhra Pradesh, India

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study analyzes factors influencing the adoption of agroforestry practices using logit analysis. In particular, the proposition that agroforestry practices have not been adopted by poor households is tested using data from West Godavari in the province of Andhra Pradesh, India. Innovation-decision process was used to guide the selection of variables used in the analysis. The results support the criticism that higher income farmers are the main beneficiaries of agroforestry if only farm forestry is considered. The results, however, do not support the criticism in the case of adoption of home gardens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavalapati JRR (1990) An analysis of factors influencing social forestry adoption: implications for forestry extension. Unpublished MSc Thesis. University of Alberta, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes DF, Allen TC and Ramsey W (1982) Social forestry in developing nations. Resource Discussion Paper D-73 F. Resources for the Future, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva M and Lerman SR (1987) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas MR and Biswas AK (1985) The skrinking forests: a threat to survival. Development and Cooperation 3: 15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose SP (1962) Peasant values and innovation in India. American Journal of Sociology 67: 552–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou GC (1983) Applications of Econometrics. McGraw-Hill Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhry K (1983) Social forestry and the rural poor. Discussion Paper Series No 10, Ford Foundation, New Delhi, 33 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhry K (1986) Wasteland and the rural poor: India. In: FAO (ed) Five Perspectives on Forestry for Rural Development in the Asia-Pacific Region. Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Souza G, Cyphers D and Phipps T (1993) Factors affecting the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review (October): 159–165

  • Evans PT (1988) Designing agroforestry innovations to increase their adoptability: a case study from Paraguay. Journal of Rural Studies 4(1): 45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1978) Forestry for local community development. Forestry Paper No 7, Rome

  • FAO (Undated) Forests, trees and people. Forestry Topics Report No 2, Rome

  • Foley G and Barnard G (1984) Farm and community forestry. Earthscan Technical Report, No 3, London

  • Gregerson HM (1988) People, trees, and rural development: the role of social forestry. Journal of Forestry 86(10): 22–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebden J (1983) Applications of Econometrics. Philip Allan Publishers Ltd, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffer CR and Strangland D (1958) Farmers' attitudes and values in relation to adoption of approved practices in corn growing. Rural Sociology 23: 112–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan CBK (1988) Forestry program fights rural poverty. Journal of Forestry 86(5): 37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala GS (1983) Limited-Dependent and Quantitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiford W (1987) Social forestry: an answer to deforestation? Development and Cooperation 4: 15–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Raintree JB (1983) Strategies for enhancing the adoptability of agroforestry innovations. Agroforestry Systems 1: 173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (1983) Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen D and Das PK (1987) The management of people's participation in community forestry: some issues. Network Paper No 4d. Social Forestry Network, London, ODI, 12 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen D and Das PK (1988) Extension in social forestry: Problem areas and needed solutions. In: Shingi PM (ed) Planning Forestry Extension Programs India, pp 11–18. Papers presented at IIMA/FAO-RFEDP Workshop, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad

  • Shiva V, Sharatchandra HC and Bandyopadhyay J (1987) Social forestry for whom? In: Korten DC (ed) Community Management: Asian Experience and Perspectives. Kumarian Press, West Hartford, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh KA (1985) An evaluation study on the effectiveness of social forestry program in Andhra Pradesh. Unpublished MSc Thesis. Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi G (1963) Measurement of analysis of socio-economic status of rural families. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • White JK (1993) SHAZAM User's Reference Manual 7.0. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alavalapati, J.R.R., Luckert, M.K. & Gill, D.S. Adoption of agroforestry practices: a case study from Andhra Pradesh, India. Agroforest Syst 32, 1–14 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00713844

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00713844

Key words

Navigation