Abstract
Data are presented that focus on the nature and development of argumentative reasoning. In particular our study describes how support for or against an issue affects memory for critical parts of an argumentative interaction, judgments of argument goodness, and the content of the reasons given in support of one view versus another. Two other factors were examined: developmental differences in argumentation skill and the conditional nature of supporting one side of an argument across varying contexts. Our results show that even seven year old children can recognize, identify, and use the basic components of an argument to provide evidence for and make judgements about their favored position. Moreover, if position support is held constant across all age groups of students, seven year old children were found to give reasons and explanations that were highly similar in content and principle to college students. The same similarities held across age with respect to biases in memory and judgements of argument goodness. The primary difference between children's and college students' argument behavior lay in the side of an argument the students chose to support. Seven year old children and some eleven yearold children supported positions that impute more value to friendship and social consequences than to the maintenance and advancement of individual rights, as specified in a contract agreement. The similarities and differences across development are discussed with respect to a theory of argumentation that speaks to the importance of understanding the nature of goal conflict and a theory of intentionality in predicting how arguments will be represented and resolved.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartlett, F.C.: 1932,Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Bernas, R.: 1992, The Conditional Nature of Argumentation, Working paper, University of Chicago, Department of Psychology.
Berkowitz, M.W.: 1980a, ‘The Role of Transactive Discourse in Moral Development: The History of a Six-Year Program of Research - Part 1’,Moral Education Forum 5, 15–27.
Berkowitz, M.W.: 1980b, ‘The Role of Transactive Discourse in Moral Development: The History of a Six-Year Program of Research - Part 2,Moral Education Forum 5, 13–26.
Berkowitz, M.W. and Gibbs, J.: 1983, ‘Measuring the Developmental Features of Moral Discussion’,Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 29 (4), 399–410.
Berkowitz, M.W. and Gibbs, J.: 1985, ‘The Process of Moral Conflict Resolution and Moral Development’, in M. Berkowitz (ed.),Peer Conflicts and Psychological Growth, in W. Damon (editor-in-chief),New Directions in Child Development (Vol. 29, pp. 71–84), San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
Berkowitz, M.W., Oser, F. and Althoff, W.: 1987, ‘The Development of Sociomoral Discourse’, in W. Kurtines and J. Gewirtz (eds.),Moral Development through Social Interaction, New York, John Wiley & Sons.
Carey, S.: 1985, ‘Are Children Fundamentally Different Kinds of Thinkers than Adults?’, in S. Chipman, J.W. Segal, and R. Glaser (eds.),Thinking and Learning Skills (Vol. 2), Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dunn, J.: 1989,The Beginnings of Social Understanding, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
Eisenberg, A.R., and Garvey, C.: 1981, ‘Children's use of Verbal Strategies in Resolving Conflicts’,Discourse Processes 4, 149–170.
Eisenber, A.R., 1987, ‘Learning to Argue With Parents and Peers’,Argumentation 1, 113–125.
Ericsson, K.A. and Simon, H.A.: 1984,Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
Fischoff, B.: 1988, ‘Judgement and Decision Making, in R.J. Sternberg and E.E. Smith (eds.),The Psychology of Human Thought, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Koehler, J.: 1989, Judgements of Evidence Quality Among Scientists as a Function of Prior Beliefs and Commitments, Unpublished dissertation, University of Chicago.
Kuhn, D.: 1989, ‘Children and Adults as Intuitive Scientists’,Psychological Review 96, 674–689.
Lord, C.G., Ross, L. and Pepper, M.: 1979, ‘Biases Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 37, 2098–2109.
Mandler, J.M.: 1983, ‘Representation’, in P.H. Mussen (ed.),Handbook of Child Psychology (Fourth Edition), Cognitive Development (Volume 3), J.H. Flavell and E.M. Markman, Volume Editors, New York, Wiley.
Miller, C.A.: 1991, ‘Learning to Disagree: Argumentative Reasoning Skill in Development, University of Chicago, Unpublished dissertation.
Much, N.C. and Shweder, R.: 1978, ‘Speaking of Rules: The Analysis of Culture in Breach’, in W. Damon (ed.),Moral Development, inNew Directions in Child Development (Vol. 2, pp. 19–39), San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
Nisbett, R.E. and Wilson, T.D.: 1977, ‘Telling More Than we Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes’,Psychological Review 84 (3), 231–259.
Noller, P.: 1980, ‘Misunderstandings in Marital Communications: Studies of Nonverbal Communication’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.39, 1135–1148.
Noller, P.: 1981, ‘Gender and Marital Adjustment Level Differences in Decoding Messages From Spouse and Strangers’,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol.41, 272–278.
Noller, P.: 1984,Nonverbal Communication and Marital Interaction, New York, Pergamon Press.
Rest, J.: 1983, ‘Morality’, in J. Flavell and E. Markman (eds.),Cognitive Development, in P. Mussen (General Ed.),Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology, (4th ed., pp. 556–629), New York, John Wiley and Sons.
Ross, L. and Lepper, M.R.: 1980,‘The Perseverance of Beliefs: Empirical and Normative Considerations’, in R.A. Shweder and D. Fiske (eds.),New Directions for Methodology of Behavioral Science: Fallible Judgement in Behavioral Research, San Francisco, Joseey-Bass.
Rottenberg, A.T.: 1985,Elements of Argument, New York, St. Martin's Press.
Stein, N.L.: 1986, ‘Knowledge and Process in the Acquisition of Writing Skills’,Review of Research in Education 13, 225–258, Washington, D.C., American Educational Research Association.
Stein, N.L. and Levine, L.: 1987, ‘Thinking About Feelings: The Development and Orgnaization of Emotional Knowledge’, in R.E. Snow and M. Farr (eds.),Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction: Cognition, Conation, and Affect (Vol. 3, pp. 165–198). Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stein, N.L. and Levine, L.: 1989, ‘The Causal Organization of Emotion Knowledge: A Developmental Study,Cognition and Emotion 3(4), 342–378.
Stein, N.L. and Levine, L.: 1990, ‘Making Sense of Emotion: The Representation and Use of Goal-Structured Knowledge’, in N.L. Stein, B.L. Leventhal, and T. Trabasso (eds.),Psychological and Biological Approaches to Emotion, Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stein, N.L. and Miller, C.A.: 1990, ‘I Win - You Lose: The Development of Argumentative Thinking, to appear in J.F. Voss, D.N. Perkins, and J. Segal (eds.),Informal Reasoning and Instruction, Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Stein, N.L. and Miller, C.A.: (in press), ‘The Development of Memory and Reasoning Skill in Argumentative Contexts: Evaluating, Explaining, and Generating Evidence’, in R. Glaser (ed.),Advances in Instructional Psychology, Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stein, N.L. and Trabasso, T.: 1982, ‘Children's Understanding of Stories: A Basis for Moral Judgement and Dilemma Resolution’, in C. Brainerd and M. Pressley (eds.),Verbal Processes in Children: Progress in Cognitive Development Research (pp. 161–188), New York, Springer Verlag.
Trabasso, T., Stein, N.L., Rodkin, P., Munger, G.P., and Baughn, C.: 1992, ‘Knowledge of Goals and Plans in the On-line Narration of Events’,Cognitive Development 7, 133–170.
Trabasso, T. and Suh, S.: 1993,‘Understanding Text: Achieving Explanatory Coherence Through On-Line Inferences and Mental Operations in Working Memory’,Discourse Processes 16, 3–34.
Ury, W.L.: 1991,Getting Past No: Negotiating with Difficult People, New York, Bantam Books.
Ury, W.L., Brett, J.M., and Goldberg, S.B.: 1988,Getting Disputes Resolved, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stein, N.L., Miller, C.A. A theory of argumentative understanding: Relationships among position preference, judgments of goodness, memory and reasoning. Argumentation 7, 183–204 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710664
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710664