Skip to main content
Log in

Heterochronical patterns of evolution in the transitional stages of vertebrate classes

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transitional forms of the recent classes of vertebrates are only known in paleontology. The well described examples are:Eusthenopteron foordi (Crossopterygii),Ichthyostega andAcanthostega (Labyrinthodontia) between Osteichthyes and Amphibia,Seymouria baylorensis (Amphibiosauria) between Amphibia and Reptilia,Archaeopteryx lithographica (Archaeornithes) between Reptilia and Aves, and the mammal-like reptiles Pelycosauria, Therapsida and Cynodontia between Reptilia and Mammalia. The description of their phylogenetical heterochronies in terms of peramorphosis and paedomorphosis shows the progressive role of the motorial, especially the locomotorial organ systems and their functions in comparison with the retarded evolution of the axial system, especially the skull and central nervous system. The evolution of the Hominidae shows the same rule. — The evaluation of these transitional forms in their fossil context reveals them as inhabitants of biotopes situated in the border areas of coastal and shore landscapes of marine, brackish or fresh water. These biotopes have obviously favoured the innovations on the high taxonomic level of macro-evolutionary characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberch, P., S.J. Gould, G.F. Oster and D.B.Wake (1979). Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Palaeobiology 5: 296–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S.W. and T.S. Westoll (1970). The postcranial skeleton of Rhipidistian fishes excludingEusthenopteron. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 68 (12): 391–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, G.R. de (1930). Embryology and Evolution. Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, G.R. de (1954). Archaeopteryx and Evolution. The Advancement of Science 42: 160–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R.L. (1988). Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution. New York, Freeman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, M.J. (1993). Ancestors and homology. Acta biotheoretica, this volume.

  • Coates, M.J. and J.A. Clack (1990). Polydactylie in the earliest known tetrapod limbs. Nature 347: 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edinger, T. (1948). Evolution of the horse brain. The Geological Society of America, Memoir 25: I-X and 1–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garstang, W. (1928). The morphology of the tunicata and its bearing on the phylogeny of the Chordata. Quaterly Journal of the Microsc. Sci. 75: 51–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E. (1868). Natürliche Schöpfungsgeschichte. Berlin, G. Reimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, T.S. (1982). Mammal-like Reptiles and the origin of Mammals. London, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebedev, O.A. (1984). Erster Fund eines devonischen tetrapoden Vertebraten. Doklady Akademija Nauk SSSR 278: 1407–1473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J.A. (1989). A new rhizodontiform fish from the early Carboniferous of Victoria, Australia, with remarks on the phylogenetic position of the group. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 9: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J.A. (1990). Fishes. In: McNamara, ed., Evolutionary Trends. London, Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1975). Wie weit sind die Grundprobleme der Evolution gelöst? In: Scharf, J.-H., ed., Evolution. Nova Acta Leopoldina N.F.42 (218): 171–179.

  • McKinney, M.L. and K.J. McNamara (1991). Heterochrony, the evolution of ontogeny. New York, Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagu, A. (1981). Growing Young. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, A.H. (1985). Lehrbuch der Paläozoologie. III/1: Fische und Amphibien. Jena, G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, A.S. and Th.S. Parsons (1983). Vergleichende Anatomie der Wirbeltiere. Hamburg, Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schad, W. (1992). Der Heterochronie-Modus in der Evolution der Wirbeltierklassen und Hominiden. Dissertation, Universität Witten/Herdecke.

  • Schindewolf, O.H. (1928). Das Problem der Menschwerdung, ein paläontologischer Lösungsversuch. Jahrbuch der Preußischen Geologischen Landesanstalt 49 (1928): 716–766. Berlin 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, H.-P. (1986). Dipnoans as Sarcopterygians. Journal of Morphology, Supplement 1: 39–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithson, T.R. (1989). The earliest known reptile. Nature 342: 676–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinar, Z. (1952). Revision of some Moravian Discosauriscidae. Rozpravy Ustred Ustavu Geol. Praha 15: 1–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thenius, E. (1970). Der Mensch und seine Herkunft. In: Grzimeks Tierleben 11: S. 53. München, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thulborn, R.A. (1987). Birds as neotenous dinosaurs. New Zealand Geological Survey Rec. 9: 90–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thulborn, R.A. and T.L. Hamley (1985). A new palaeoecological role for Archaeopteryx. In: Hecht, M.K. et al., eds. The Beginnings of Birds. S.81–89. Eichstätt.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schad, W. Heterochronical patterns of evolution in the transitional stages of vertebrate classes. Acta Biotheor 41, 383–389 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709372

Keywords

Navigation