Abstract
Groups of 16 girls referred for evaluation and treatment of sexual abuse and 16 nonreferred girls between the ages of 5 and 8 years were compared on aggression, avoidance, private parts reference, and freeplay over two conditions: playing alone with anatomically correct dolls and telling a story about the dolls to an adult. Results indicated that sexually abused children displayed more sexually oriented behavior when alone but more avoidance of the dolls when interacting with an adult.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alter-Reid K, Gibbs MS, Lachenmeyer JR, Sigal J & Massoth NA: Sexual abuse of children: A review of empirical findings.Clin Psychol Rev 6:249–266, 1986.
Finkelhor D & Hotlaing GT: Sexual abuse in the national incidence study of child abuse and neglect: An appraisal.Child Abuse & Negl 8:22–33, 1984.
Russell D: The incidence and prevalence of intrafamilial and extrafamilial sexual abuse of female children.Child Abuse & Negl 7:22–39, 1983.
Bauer H: Preparation of the sexually abused child for court testimony.Am Acad Psychiatry and Law Bull 11:287–289, 1983.
Giaretto H: Humanistic treatment of father-daughter incest. In Helfer RE & Kempe HC (Eds.)Child Abuse and Neglect: The Family and the Community. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1976.
Whitcomb D Shapiro E & Stillwagen L:When the Victim is a Child: Issues for Judges and Prosecutors. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 1985.
Papers from a National Policy Conference on Legal Reforms in Child Sexual Abuse Cases. Washington, DC: American Bar Association, 1985.
United States Attorney General's Task Force Report on Family Violence. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 1984.
Berliner L & Barbieri M: The testimony of the child victim of sexual assault. Soc Iss 40:125–137, 1984.
Harnest J:Teach-a-Bodies: An Effective Resource for Sex Education, Investigation, Therapy and Courtroom Testimony. Forth Worth, TX: Teach-a-Bodies, 1983.
Harnest J & Chavern H:A Survey of the Use of Anatomically Correct Dolls in Sex Education Investigation, Therapy and Courtroom Testimony. Paper presented at the Seventh World Congress of Sexology, New Delhi, India, 1985.
Freidemann V & Morgan M:Interviewing Sexual Abuse Victims Using Anatomical Dolls: The Professional's Guide Book. Eugene, OR: Migma Designs, Inc., 1985.
White S, Strom GA, Santilli G: & Halpin, B.M.: Interviewing young sexual abuse victims with anatomically correct dolls.Child Abuse & Negl 10:519–529, 1986.
Jampole L & Weber MK: An assessment of the behavior of sexually abused victims with anatomically correct dolls.Child Abuse & Negl 11:187–192, 1987.
Finkelhor D:Child sexual abuse; new theory and research. New York: The Free Press, Macmillan, Inc., 1984.
Finkelhor D, Gelles R, Hotaling G & Straus M:The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1983.
Patterson GR: Naturalistic observation in clinical assessment.Abn Child Psychol 5:309–322, 1977.
Cairns RB & Green JA: How to assess personality and social patterns: Observations or ratings? In R. Cairns (Ed.)The Analysis of Social Interactions: Methods, Issues and Illustrations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1979.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The research reported in this article was completed by the first author as part of a doctoral dissertation in Counseling Psychology at the University of Miami under the supervision of the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
August, R.L., Forman, B.D. A comparison of sexually abused and nonsexually abused children's behavioral responses to anatomically correct dolls. Child Psych Hum Dev 20, 39–47 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706956
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706956