Skip to main content
Log in

Incentive contracting in mental health: State and local relations

  • Articles
  • Published:
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the problems of mental health care in the 1970s and 1980s is “dollars not following patients”. One factor contributing to this alleged mismatch in funds is that many states have provided public mental hospital services to localities as a free good. In an effort to reduce the use of state mental hospitals, a number of states have recently introduced payment incentives. This paper presents a framework for considering the likely effects of these incentives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, P. (1985).The transfer of care: Psychiatric deinstitutionalization and its aftermath. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R., & Gaynor, M. (1989). Incentives, optimality, and publicly provided goods: The case of mental health services. Unpublished manuscript. Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganju, V., & Bouchard, C. (1990).Funding incentives for community-based programs: The impact on local service delivery systems of Texas' $35.50 program. Paper presented at the First Conference on State Mental Health Agency Services Research, NASMHPD Research Institute.

  • Glover, R., Berger, B., & Nelson, L. (1989). Performance contracting: The Colorado model.Joural of Mental Health Administration, 16, 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grob, G. (1983).Mental Illness and American society, 1875–1940. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manderscheid, R., & Barrett, S. (1987).Mental Health, United States, 1987 (DHHS Publication No. ADM 87-1518). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew-Younes, L., & Goldman, H. (1987). The effectiveness of the $35.50 prospective payment reform. Report on Component 2 of theStudy of adequacy of community-based aftercare services that serve patients discharged from eight state hospitals. Prepared for the R.A.J. Review Panel.

  • Mechanic, D. (1987). Evolution of mental health services and areas for change. In: D. Mechanic (Ed.),Improving mental health services: What the social sciences can tell us. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.E., & Rago, W.B. (1988). Fiscal incentive to development of services in the community.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 39.

  • Stein, L., & Ganser, L. (1983). Wisconsin's system for funding mental health services. In J. Talbott (Ed.),Unified mental health systems: Utopia unrealized. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taube, C., & Goldman, H. (1989). State strategies to restructure state psychiatric hospitals — a selective review.Inquiry, 26, 146–157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by Grant No. 1 R29 MH45841-01 from the National Institute of Mental Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaynor, M. Incentive contracting in mental health: State and local relations. Adm Policy Ment Health 18, 33–42 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706490

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00706490

Keywords

Navigation