Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of the erosion control potential of agroforestry systems in the Himalayan region

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The great erosion control potential of agroforestry systems is generally recognized. However, insufficient data are available to be able to give absolute quantitative values for the erosion control potential of specific agroforestry systems or to compare their potential. To obtain such quantitative erosion data, long-term standard erosion measurements should be done in specific agroforestry systems. Such measurements may become very costly because the data need to be collected in a wide range of agroforestry systems on different sites over a long time. A further constraint is the reliability of such information: erosion figures may not be comparable because of discrepancy between the scale of measurement and the scale of the agroforestry system and the occurrence of different kinds of erosion. The methodology presented here enables a quick comparative estimation of the erosion (surface erosion, gully erosion and mass movement) control potential of different agroforestry systems. The erosion control value of agroforestry systems is related to their protective functions: the cover, barrier and soil reinforcement functions. The methodology involves identifying which features influence these different functions within a specific agroforestry system and subsequently evaluating the efficacy. The applicability of this methodology is demonstated with examples from various agroforestry systems in the Himalayan region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bannister ME and Nair PKR (1990) Alley cropping as a sustainable agricultural technology for the hillsides of Haiti: experience of an agroforestry outreach project. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 5(2): 50–59

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borthakur DN, Singh A and Prasad RN (1985) Shifting cultivation in North East India and a strategy for land and water resource management. Beitr Trop Landwirtsch Veterinärmed 23: 147–158

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bregman L (1991) Agroforestry systems in the Himalayan region and their contribution to soil erosion control. Thesis, Section of Silviculture and Forest Ecology, Department of Forestry, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coppin NJ and Richards IG (1990) Use of vegetation in civil engineering. Construction Industry Research and Information Association, Butterworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dunsmore JR (1987) Khardep: rural development in the hills of Nepal. Land Resource Study No 36. Land Resources Development Centre, Surbiton, England

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eppink LAAJ (1986) Introduction to erosion, erosion control and soil conservation. Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands (in Dutch)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gilmour DA (1984) People, forests and erosion: experiences from the Middle Hills of Nepal. In: O'Loughlin CL and Pearce AJ, eds, Symposium on effects of forest land use on erosion and slope stability, 7–11 May, 1984, pp 15–21. Environment and Policy Institute, East-West Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gray DH and Megahan WF (1981) Forest vegetation removal and slope stability in the Idaho Batholith. Research Paper INT-271. Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, USA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kyuma K and Pairintra (1983) Shifting cultivation: an experiment at Nam Phrom. Northeast Thailand, and its implications for upland farming in the monsoon tropics. Faculty of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maharjan MR (1987) Agroforestry in community development. Banko Janakari 1(4): 63–66

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maithani GP, Bahuguna VK and Negi JDS (1986) Natural processes in the redeeming of Garhwal Himalayan wastelands and future strategies for reclamation: a case study. Indian For 112(7): 608–615

    Google Scholar 

  12. Megahan F and King PN (1985) Identification of critical areas on forest lands for control of nonpoint sources of pollution. Environmental Management 9(1): 7–18

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mongi HO and Huxley PA, eds (1979) Soils Research in Agroforestry. International Council for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  14. Montsma G (1988) Zooforestry. In: Wiersum KF, ed, Viewpoints on Agroforestry, pp 91–100. Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  15. Prasad RN, Singh A and Varma A (1987) Application of research findings for management of land and water resources in Eastern Himalayan Region. ICAR Research Complex for North Eastern Hill Region, Shillong Meghalaya, India

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prichett WL (1979) Properties and Management of Forest Soils. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Raintree JB (1986) Agroforestry pathways for intensification of shifting cultivation. Agroforestry Systems 4: 39–54

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rice RM (1978) The effect of forest management on erosion and sedimentation due to landslides. Proceedings of the Eighth World Forestry Congress, Part 3, pp 319–332. Jakarta, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sanchez PA (1987) Soil productivity and sustainability in agroforestry systems. In: Steppler HA and Nair PKR, eds, Agroforestry: A Decade of Development, pp 205–223. International Council for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  20. Seth SK (1981) India and Sri Lanka: Agroforestry. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shrivastava MB, Shrivastava M and Lal CB (1988) Grazinglands, causes of their deterioration and improvement in India. Indian J Range Management 9: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singh A and Prasad RN (1987) Alternatives to Shifting Cultivation. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ssekabembe CK (1985) Perspectives on hedgerow intercropping. Agroforestry Systems 3: 339–356

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wiersum KF (1984) Surface erosion under various tropical agroforestry systems. In: O'Loughlin CL and Pearce AJ, eds, Symposium on effects of forest land use on erosion and slope stability 7–11 May, 1984, pp 231–239. Environment and Policy Institute, East-West Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wiersum KF (1986) Social forestry and agroforestry in India. Report No 456. Rijksinstituut voor Onderzoek in de Bos- en Landschapsbouw ‘De Dorschkamp’, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wiersum KF (1988) Soil management and nutrient balances in agroforestry. In: Wiersum KF, ed, Viewpoints on Agroforestry, pp 109–126. Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wiersum KF (1991) Soil erosion and conservation in agroforestry systems. In: Avery ME, Cannell MGR and Ong CK, eds, Biological Research in Asian Agroforestry, pp 209–230. Winrock International, South Asia Books, USA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Young A (1984) Evaluation of agroforestry potential in sloping areas. ICRAF Working Paper No 27. International Council for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, Kenya

    Google Scholar 

  29. Young A (1987) Soil productivity, soil conservation and land evaluation. Agroforestry Systems 5: 277–291

    Google Scholar 

  30. Young A (1988) Agroforestry in the control of soil erosion by water. Agroforestry Abstracts 1(2/3): 39–48

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bregman, L. Comparison of the erosion control potential of agroforestry systems in the Himalayan region. Agroforest Syst 21, 101–116 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705223

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705223

Key words

Navigation