Skip to main content
Log in

Restorative proctocolectomy in elective and emergency cases of ulcerative colitis

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A consecutive series of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis was reviewed to determine whether an emergency restorative proctocolectomy procedure leads to a higher morbidity, more especially anastomotic leakage. Severity of illness and nature of surgery were divided in two categories: (1) no acute disease and elective surgery (18 patients), (2) acute disease requiring emergency surgery either immediately or within one week of admission (12 patients). Morbidity after elective surgery was 27% and after emergency surgery 66% (P<0.06). Pouch-anal leakage occurred in 11% and 41% respectively (P=0.08). Five risk factors significantly influenced the leak rate including preoperative white blood cell count>10000/μl (P<0.02), urgent nature of surgery (P<0.02), the combination of leucocytosis and urgent nature of surgery (P=0.02), the combination of leucocytosis and preoperative corticosteroid dose equivalent to ≥200 mg hydrocortisone/24 h (P=0.006), postoperative pelvic haematoma (P<0.05). In conclusion, restorative proctocolectomy is contraindicated in emergency circumstances, especially in patients with signs of sepsis on a high corticosteroid dose. To reduce operative risk and number of procedures required, patients with relapsing ulcerative colitis should be referred for restorative proctocolectomy while being in remission.

Résumé

Une série consécutive de proctocolectomies totales pour colite ulcéro-hémorragique avec reconstruction iléo-anale a été étudiée afin de déterminer si le geste chirurgical réalisé en urgence entraine une morbidité plus élevée et des fuites anastomotiques plus fréquentes. La sévérité de l'affection et la nature du geste chirurgical ont été regroupées en deux catégories: (1) pas d'affection aigüe et chirurgie élective (18 patients), (2) affection aigüe nécessitant un geste chirurgical en urgence soit immédiatement soit dans la semaine qui suit l'admission (12 patients). La morbidité après chirurgie élective était de 27% et après chirurgie d'urgence de 66% (P<0,06). Des fuites anastomotiques au niveau de la poche sont survenues venues respectivement dans 11% et 41% (P=0,08). Cinq facteurs influencent de manière significative le taux de fuites anastomotiques: leucocytose pré-opératoire supérieure à 10.000/ml (P<0,02), la nature urgente de la chirurgie (P<0,02), la combinaison d'une hyperleucocytose et d'un geste chirurgical en urgence (P=0,02), la combinaison d'une hyperleucocytose et de la prise de corticostéroides en une dose équivalent à plus de 200 mg d'hydrocortisone par 24 h (P=0,006), un hématome pelvien post-opératoire (P<0,05). En conclusion, le rétablissement immédiat de la continuité après proctocolectomie est contre-indiqué en urgence, particulièrement chez des patients qui présentent des signes septiques sous des doses élevées de corticoides. Afin de réduire le risque opératoire et le nombre de temps chirurgicaux, les patients présentant des poussées itératives de colite ulcéro-hémorragique devraient être adressés pour une chirurgie avec rétablissement de la continuité au cours d'une phase de rémission de la maladie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Köhler LW, Pemberton JH, Zinsmeister AR, Kelly KA (1991) Quality of life after proctocolectomy. Gastroenterology 101:679–684

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ (1982) Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. BMJ 2:85–88

    Google Scholar 

  3. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ, Belliveau P (1980) Proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 67:533–538

    Google Scholar 

  4. Utsunomiya J, Iwana T, Imajo M, Matsuo S, Sawai S, Yaegashi K, Hirayama R (1980) Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 23:459–466

    Google Scholar 

  5. Utsunomiya J, Oota M, Iwana T (1986) Recent trends in ileoanal anastomosis. Ann Chir Gynaecol 75:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fonkalsrud EW (1981) Endorectal ileal pull through with lateral ileal reservoir for benign colorectal disease. Ann Surg 194:761–766

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fonkalsrud EW (1984) Endorectal ileoanal anastomosis with isoperistaltic ileal reservoir after colectomy and mucosal proctectomy. Ann Surg 199:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nicholls RJ, Pezim ME (1985) Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of 3 reservoir designs. Br J Surg 72:470–474

    Google Scholar 

  9. de Silva HJ, de Angelis CP, Soper N, Kettlewell MGW, McMortensen NJ, Jewell DP (1991) Clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 78:1039–1044

    Google Scholar 

  10. williams NS, Johnston D (1985) The current status of mucosal proctectomy and ileoanal anastomosis in the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis and adenomatous polyposis. Br J Surg 72:159–168

    Google Scholar 

  11. Williams NS (1989) Restorative proctocolectomy is the first choice elective surgical treatment for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 76:1109–1110

    Google Scholar 

  12. Phillips RKS (1991) Pelvic pouches. Br J Surg 78:1025–1026

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sackier JM, Wood CW (1988) Ulcerative colitis and polyposis coli; surgical options. Surg Clinics N Am 68:1319–1338

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ghyselen J, Penninckx F, Vandervelpen G, Kerremans R (1987) Evolution of the surgical treatment in ulcerative colitis. Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica 50:317–325

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ondrula DP, Nelson RL, Prasad ML, Coyle BW, Abcarian H (1992) Multifactorial index of preoperative risk factors in colon resections. Dis Colon Rectum 35:117–122

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keighley MRB, Winslet MC, Flinn R, Kmiot W (1989) Multivariate analysis of factors influencing the results of restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 76:740–744

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fleshman JW, Cohen Z, McLeod RS, Stern H, Blair J (1988) The ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis procedure: factors affecting technical and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 31:10–16

    Google Scholar 

  18. Glotzer DJ, Silen W (1980) Indications for operation in inflamatory bowel disease. In: Kirsner JB, Shorter RG (eds) Inflammatory bowel disease. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 488–517

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goligher JC (1985) Proctocolectomy and ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. In: Allan RN, Keighley MRB, Alexander-Williams J, Hawkins C (eds) Inflammatory bowel diseases. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 247–256

    Google Scholar 

  20. Talbot RW, Ritchie JK, Northover JMA (1989) Conservative proctocolectomy: a dubious option in ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 76:738–739

    Google Scholar 

  21. Winslet MC, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MRB (1990) Conservative proctocolectomy with low transsection of the anorectum is a poor alternative to conventional proctocolectomy in inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Colorect Dis 5:117–119

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heyvaert, G., Penninckx, F., Filex, L. et al. Restorative proctocolectomy in elective and emergency cases of ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorect Dis 9, 73–76 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00699416

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00699416

Keywords

Navigation