Skip to main content
Log in

Tradeable permits for pollution control when emission location matters: What have we learned?

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our knowledge about tradeable permit approaches to pollution control has grown rapidly in the two decades in which they have received serious analytical attention. Not only have the theoretical models become more focused and the empirical work more detailed, but we have now had over a decade of experience with them in the U.S. This article draws upon economic theory, empirical studies, and actual experience with implementation to summarize what we have learned about applying tradeable permits to air pollution control in the special circumstance where the spatial aspects of the problem are a prime consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, S. E. and T. H. Tietenberg (1982), ‘The Empirical Properties of Two Classes of Designs for Transferable Discharge Permit Markets’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 9, 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S. E. (1983), ‘Marketable Pollution Permits and Acid Rain Externalities’,Canadian Journal of Economics 16, 704–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S. E. and T. H. Tietenberg (1984), ‘Approaches for Reaching Ambient Standards in Non-Attainment Areas: Financial Burden and Efficiency Considerations’,Land Economics 60, 148–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S. E. and T. H. Tietenberg (1987), ‘Economic Implications of Emission Trading Rules for Local and Regional Pollutants’Canadian Journal of Economics 20, 370–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S. E. and T. H. Tietenberg (1991), ‘Market Failure in Incentive-Based Regulation: The Case of Emissions Trading’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 21, 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, P., C. Clough, and K. Millock (1993), ‘Combining Ecological and Economic Considerations in Sulfur Emission Abatement Analysis-The Calculation of Sulfur Emission Exchange Rates’, a paper presented at the International Conference on Economic Instruments for Air Pollution Control, October, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.

  • Brough, W., E. Clarke, and N. Tideman (unpublished, 1993), ‘Airport Noise and Congestion: The Interplay of Allocation and Distribution’, Working Paper of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

  • Burtraw, D., K. Harrison, and P. Turner (1994), ‘Path Dependence in Bilateral Emission Trading’, a paper presented at the American Economics Association Meetings, Boston, MA.

  • Dudek, D. J. and J. Palmisano (1988), ‘Emissions Trading: Why is this Thoroughbred Hobbled?’,Columbia Journal of Environmental Law 13, 217–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, J. P. (1992), ‘California's Tradeable Emissions Policy and Its Application to the Control of Greenhouse Gases’, in OECD,Climate Change: Designing a Tradeable Permit System Paris, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, V. and R. Hahn (1994), ‘ET in LA: Looking Back to the Future’, a paper presented at the American Economics Association Meetings in Boston, MA.

  • Hahn, R. W. and R. G. Noll (1982), ‘Barriers to Implementing Tradable Air Pollution Permits: Problems of Regulatory Interactions’,Yale Journal of Regulation 1, 63–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. W. (1986), ‘Trade-Offs in Designing Markets with Multiple Objectives’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. W. (1990), ‘Regulatory Constraints on Environmental Markets’,Journal of Public Economics 42, 149–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, C. W. and D. R. Lee (1983), ‘Priority Pollution Rights: Adapting Pollution Control to a Variable Environment’,Land Economics 59, 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICF Resources, Inc. (1989), ‘Economic, Environmental, and Coal Market Impacts of SO2 Emissions Trading Under Alternative Acid Rain Control Proposals’, a report prepared for the Regulatory Innovations Staff, USEPA.

  • Kete, N. (1992), ‘The U.S. Acid Rain Allowance Trading System’, in OECD,Climate Change: Designing a Tradeable Permit System Paris, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

  • Klaassen, G. A. J. and F. Førsund (1993), ‘Emission Trading in Europe with and Exchange Rate’, paper prepared for the Fourth Annual Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, June 30–July 3, Fontainebleau, France.

  • Klaassen, G. and M. Amann (1992), ‘Trading of Emission Reduction Commitments for Sulfur Dioxide in Europe’, SR-92-03, Laxenburg, Austria; International Institute for Applied System Analysis.

  • Kruitwagen, S. (1992), ‘Tradeable Permits for SO2 Emissions In Europe: A Pollution Offset Experiment’, Wageningen Economic papers, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupnick, A. J., W. E. Oates, and Van De Verg (1983), ‘On Marketable Air Pollution Permits: The Case for a System of Pollution Offsets’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 10, 233–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupnick, A. J. (1986), ‘Costs of Alternative Policies for the Control of Nitrogen Dioxide in Baltimore’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 13, 189–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGartland, A. M. (1984), ‘Marketable Permit Systems for Air Pollution Control: An Empirical Study’, Unpublished Dissertation, University of Maryland.

  • McGartland, A. M. and W. E. Oates (1985), ‘Marketable Permits for the Prevention of Environmental Deterioration’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 12, 207–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, W. D. (1972), ‘Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs’,Journal of Economic Theory 5, 395–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, B. (1992), ‘Phasing Down Lead in Gasoline in the U.S.: Mandates, Incentives, Trading and Banking’, in OECD,Climate Change: Designing a Tradeable Permit System Paris, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E., P. R. Portney, and A. M. McGartland (1989), ‘The Net Benefits of Incentive-Based Regulation: The Case of Environmental Standard Setting’,American Economic Review 79, 1233–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach F., C. Kolstad, A. V. Tobin, and M. William (1981), ‘Alternative Air Quality Policy Options in the Four Corners Region’,Southwestern Review 1, 29–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seskin, E. P., R. J. Anderson, Jr. and R. O. Reid (1983), ‘An Empirical Analysis of Economic Strategies for Controlling Air Pollution’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 10, 112–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (1993),Taxation and the Environment, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spofford, W. O., Jr. (1984), ‘Efficiency Properties of Alternative Source Control Policies for Meeting Ambient Air Quality Standards: An Empirical Application to the Lower Delaware Valley’, Discussion paper D-118, Washington D.C., Resources for the Future, November.

  • Tietenberg, T. H. (1973), ‘Specific Taxes and the Control of Pollution: A General Equilibrium Analysis’,Quarterly Journal of Economics 87, 503–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietenberg, T. H. (1985), ‘Emissions Trading: An Exercise in Reforming Pollution Policy, Washington D.C., Resources for the Future.

  • Van Ierland, E. C., S. Kruitwagen, and E. M. T. Hendrix (1993), ‘Tradeable Discharge Permits for Acidifying Emissions in Europe: ‘Guided’ Bilateral Trade’, a paper presented at the International Conference on Economic Instruments for Air Pollution Control, October, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tietenberg, T. Tradeable permits for pollution control when emission location matters: What have we learned?. Environ Resource Econ 5, 95–113 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00693018

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00693018

Key words

Navigation