Skip to main content
Log in

Kinetics of sulfate uptake by freshwater and marine species ofDesulfovibrio

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Archives of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Apparent half-saturation constants (K m) and maximum uptake rates (V max) for sulfate were determined in four species ofDesulfovibrio of freshwater and marine origin using a35S-sulfate tracer technique. The lowerstK m (5 μM) was found in the freshwater speciesDesulfovibrio vulgaris (Marburg) and the highestK m (77 μM) in the marine speciesDesulfovibrio salexigens. Maximum specific rates of sulfate uptake (i.e.,V max) were proportional to the growth rates observed in batch cultures. The halophilicDesulfovibrio salexigens did not change itsK m andV max between 1 and 6,000 μM SO 2-4 , and apparently did not induce a low-affinity uptake system at high sulfate concentrations. The low half-saturation constants measured for sulfate uptake explain why high rates of bacterial sulfate reduction occur in surface sediments of freshwater lakes, and why sulfate reduction can be a quantitatively important process in anaerobic carbon mineralization in low-sulfate environments. The results shows that extremely low sulfate concentrations must occur before sulfate reduction is completely outcompeted by methanogenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MPB:

methane producing bacteria

SRB:

sulfate reducing bacteria

References

  • Abram JW, Nedwell DB (1978) Inhibition of methanogenesis by sulphate reducing bacteria competing for transferred hydrogen. Arch Microbiol 117:89–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Badziong W, Thauer RK, Zeikus JG (1978) Isolation and characterization ofDesulfovibrio growing on hydrogen plus sulfate as the sole energy source. Arch Microbiol 116:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Balch WE, Wolfe RS (1976) New approach to the cultivation of methanogenic bacteria: 2-mercapto-ethanesulfonic acid (HS-CoM)-dependent growth ofMethanobacterium ruminantium in a pressurized atmosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 32:781–791

    Google Scholar 

  • Halwachs W (1978)K m andV max from only one experiment. Biotechnol Bioeng XX: 281–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey FP (1980) Slope of the Monod equation as an indicator for advantage in nutrient competition. Microb Ecol 5:281–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingvorsen K, Brock TD (1982) Electron flow via sulfate reduction and methanogenesis in the anaerobic hypolimnion of Lake Mendota. Limnol Oceanogr 27:559–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingvorsen K, Zeikus JG, Brock TD (1981) Dynamics of bacterial sulfate reduction in a eutrophic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol 42, 1029–1036

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingvorsen K, Zehnder AJB, Jørgensen BB (1984) Kinetics of sulfate and acetate uptake byDesulfobacter postgatei. Appl Environ Microbiol 47:403–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JG, Simon BM (1981) Differences in microbial decomposition processes in profundal and littoral lake sediments, with particular reference to the nitrogen cycle. J Gen Microbiol 123:297–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen BB (1977) The sulfur cycle of a coastal marine sediment (Limfjorden, Denmark). Limnol Oceanogr 22:814–832

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen BB (1982) Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed — the role of sulfate reduction. Nature 296:643–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen BB (1983) Processes at the sediment-water interface. In: Bolin B, Cook RB (eds) The major biogeochemical cycles and their interactions. SCOPE, pp 477–515

  • Koch AL (1971) The adaptive responses ofEscherichia coli to a feast and famine existence. In: Rose AH, Wilkinson JF (eds) Advances in microbial physiology, vol 6. Academic Press, London, pp 147–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch AL, Wang CH (1982) How close to the theoretical diffusion limit do bacterial uptake systems function? Arch Microbiol 131:36–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristjansson JK, Schönheit P, Thauer RK (1982) DifferentK s values for hydrogen of methanogenic bacteria and sulfate reducing bacteria: An explanation for the apparent inhibition of methanogenesis by sulfate. Arch Microbiol 131:278–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlewood D, Postgate JR (1957) Sodium chloride and the growth ofDesulphovibrio desulphuricans. J Gen Microbiol 17:378–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C-L, Peck HD Jr. ((1981) Comparative bioenergetics of sulfate reduction inDesulfovibrio andDesulfotomaculum spp. J. Bacteriol 145:966–973

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovley DR, Klug MJ (1983) Sulfate reducers can outcompete methanogens at freshwater sulfate concentrations. Appl Environ Microbiol 45:187–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria SE (1960) The bacterial protoplasm composition and organization. In: Gunsalus IC, Stanier RY (eds) The bacteria, vol 1. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Magee EL Jr, Ensley BD, Barton LL (1978) An assessment of growth yields and energy coupling inDesulfovibrio. Arch Microbiol 117:21–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens CS, Berner RA (1974) Methane production in the interstitial waters of sulfate-depleted marine sediments. Science 185:1167–1169

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountfort DO, Asher RA, Mays EL, Tiedje JM (1980) Carbon and electron flow in mud and sandflat intertidal sediments at Delaware Inlet, Nelson, New Zealand. Appl Envivon Microbiol 39:686–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Oremland RS, Polcin S (1982) Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction: Competitive and noncompetitive substrates in estuarine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:1270–1276

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfennig N, Widdel F (1982) The bacteria of the sulphur cycle. In Postgate JR, Kelly DP (eds) Sulphur bacteria. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 298, pp 433–441

  • Pirt SJ (1975) Principles of microbe and cell cultivation. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford London Edinburgh Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Postgate JR (1979) The sulphate-reducing bacteria. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge London New York Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Postgate JR (1982) Economic importance of sulphur bacteria. In: Postgate JR, Kelly DP (eds) Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 298, pp 583–600

  • Schönheit P, Kristjansson JK, Thauer RK (1982) Kinetic mechanism for the ability of sulfate reducers to out-compete methanogens for acetate. Arch Microbiol 132:285–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL, Klug MJ (1981) Reduction of sulfur compounds in the sediments of a eutrophic lake basin. Appl Environ Microbiol 41:1230–1237

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen J, Christensen D, Jørgensen BB (1981) Volatile fatty acids and hydrogen as substrates for sulfate-reducing bacteria in anaerobic marine sediment. Appl Environ Microbiol 42:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempest DW, Neijssel OM (1978) Eco-physiological aspects of microbial growth in aerobic nutrient-limited environments. In: Alexander M (ed) Advances in microbial ecology, vol 2. Plenum Press, New York London, pp 105–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Westrich JT (1983) The consequences and controls of bacterial sulfate reduction in marine sediments. Ph. D. thesis, Yale University

  • Widdel F (1980) Anaerober Abbau von Fettsäuren und Benzoesäure durch neu isolierte Arten sulfat-reduzierender Bakterien. Ph. D. thesis, University of Göttingen

  • Winfrey MR, Zeikus JG (1977) Effect of sulfate on carbon and electron flow during microbial methanogenesis in fresh-water sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:275–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolin EA, Wolin MJ, Wolfe RS (1963) Formation of methane by bacterial extracts. J Biol Chem 238:2882–2886

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ingvorsen, K., Jørgensen, B.B. Kinetics of sulfate uptake by freshwater and marine species ofDesulfovibrio . Arch. Microbiol. 139, 61–66 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00692713

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00692713

Key words

Navigation