Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring the trade-off between economic growth and a clean environment

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article surveys various aspects of the measurement of environmental quality from the view point of national accounting and welfare economics. It focuses on the question whether GNP or NNP should be corrected for environmental change (‘green’ or ‘eco’-GNP) or whether physical accounts provide sufficient information for an assessment of the trade-off mentioned above. We conclude that valuation of (services from) environmental capital cannot be avoided for such assessment, but can only be made using a model based approach. Statistical agencies should continue to collect data on environmental quality and to value changes in environmental capital in the context of national resource accounting. However, official statisticians should refrain from correcting GNP or NNP for environmental change, as this correction implicitly contains a political judgment and cannot be based on mere technical knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arntzen, J. and A. Gilbert (1991), ‘Natural Resource Accounting: State of the Art and Perspectives for the Assessment of Trends in Sustainable Development’, in O. Kuik and H. Verbruggen, eds., InSearch of Indicators of Sustainable Development, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, J. de, H. Aiking, E. Lammers, V. Sol and J. Feenstra (1991), ‘Contours of an Integrated Environmental Index for Application in Land-Use Zoning’, in O. Kuik and H. Verbruggen, eds., InSearch of Indicators of Sustainable Development, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boo, A. J. de, P. R. Bosch, C. N. Gorter and S. J. Keuning (1991), ‘An Environmental Module and the Complete System of National Accounts’,National Accounts Occasional Paper, Nr. NA-046, CBS, Voorburg.

  • Bos, F. (1992), ‘The History of National Accounting’,National Accounts Occasional Paper, Nr. NA-048, CBS, Voorburg.

  • Butter, F. A. G. den (1992), ‘The Mirror of Cleanliness: On the Construction and Use of an Environmental Index’, in J. J. Krabbe and W. J. M. Heijman eds.,National Income and Nature: Externalities, Growth and Steady State, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 49–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. (1937),National Income and Outlay, MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. E. (1989), ‘Toward a Measure of Sustainable Social Net National Product’, in Y. J. Ahmad, S. El Serafy, and E. Lutz, eds.,Environmental Accounting for Sustainable Development, Washington D.C.:World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A. J. and J. F. Feenstra (1992),An Indicator of Sustainable Development — Diffusion of Cadmium, Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Press, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, A. J. (1994),Environmental Accounting and Sustainable Development, Academic Thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gradus, R. and S. Smulders (1993), The Trade-Off Between Environmental Care and Long-term Growth — Pollution in Three Prototype Growth Models,Journal of Economics 58, 25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. (1940), ‘The Valuation of Social Income’,Economica 7, 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. (1948), ‘The Valuation of Social Income — A Comment on Professor Kuznets Reflections’,Economica 15, 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoevenagel, R. and H. Verbruggen (1989),De Waarde van Het Milieu, Institute for Environmental Studies R-89/09, Amsterdam.

  • Hoevenagel, R. (1994),The Contingent Valuation Methods: Scope and Validity, Academic Thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoevenagel, R. and J. B. Opschoor (1990), ‘Economische Waardering van Milieuveranderingen: Mogelijkheden en Beperkingen,Milieu 3, 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, C., J. Parker and S. Peake (1992), ‘A Pilot Environmental Index for the UK in the 1980s’,Energy Policy 20, 335–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hueting, R., P. Bosch and B. de Boer (1992), ‘Methodology for the Calculation of Sustainable National Income’,Statistical Essays M44, Central Bureau of Statistics, Voorburg.

  • Keuning, S. J. (1992), ‘National Accounts and the Environment: the Case for an System's Approach’,National Accounts Occasional Paper, Nr. NA-053, CBS, Voorburg.

  • Krelle, W. (1984), ‘Economic Growth with Exhaustible Resources and Environmental Protection’,Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft 140, 399–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuik, O. and H. Verbruggen (eds.) (1991), InSearch of Indicators of Sustainable Development, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1948), ‘On the Valuations of Social Income — Reflection on Professor Hick's Article’,Economica 5, 1–16 (Part I) and 116–131 (Part II).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leipert, Ch. (1989),Die heimlichen Kosten des Fortschritts, Frankfurt a.M.

  • Mäler, K.-G. (1991), ‘National Accounts and Environmental Resources’,Environmental and Resource Economics 1, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastenbroek, A. P. and P. Nijkamp (1976), ‘Determination of Social Costs of Environmental Damage’, in M. Chatterji and P. van Rompuy, eds.,Energy, Regional Science and Public Policy, Proceedings of the International Conference on Regional Science, Energy and Environment I, Louvain, May 1975, Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 262–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nentjes, A. and D. Wiersma (1992), ‘On Economic Growth, Technology and the Environment’, in J. J. Krabbe and W. J. M. Heijman, eds.,National Income and Nature: Externalities, Growth and Steady State, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 143–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaisen, J., A. Dean, and P. Hoeller (1991), ‘Economics and the Environment: A Survey of Issues and Policy Options’,OECD Economic Studies 16, 7–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P. and J. Paelinck (1973), ‘Some Models for the Economic Evaluation of the Environment’,Regional and Urban Economics 3, 33–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyborg, K. (1991),“Eco Domestic Product”: the Answer to Which Question?, Norwegian Central Bureau of Statistics, Oslo, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opschoor, J. B. (1991), ‘GNP and Sustainable Income Measures: Some Problems and a Way Out’, in O. Kuik en H. Verbruggen, eds., InSearch of Indicators of Sustainable Development, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opschoor, J. B. and L. Reijnders (1991), ‘Towards Sustainable Development Indicators’, in O. Kuik en H. Verbruggen, eds., InSearch of Indicators of Sustainable Development, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 7–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, W. R. (1978),Environmental Indices; Theory and Practice, Ann Arbor Science, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W. and A. Markandya (1989),Environmental Benefit Estimation: Monetary Evaluation, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W., A. Markandya, and E. Barbier (1989),Blueprint for a Green Economy, Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. (1932),The Economics of Welfare, MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploeg, F. van der and C. Withagen (1991), ‘Pollution Control and the Ramsey Problem’,Environmental and Resource Economics 2, 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repetto, R., W. Magrath, M. Wells, C. Beer, and F. Rossini (1989),Wasting Assets: Natural Resources in the National Income Accounts, World Resources, Institute, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repetto, R. (1990),Integrating Natural Resources and Environmental Accounting into the National Accounts, Background paper No. 4, Workshop on the Economics of Sustainable Development, Washington DC, January 23–26, 1990.

  • Shechter, M. (1991), ‘A Comparative Study of Environmental Amenity Valuations’,Environmental and Resource Economics 1, 129–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistical Office of the United Nations (1990),SNA Handbook on Integrated Environmental Accounting, United Nations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahvonen, O. and J. Kuuluvainen (1991), ‘Optimal Growth with Renewable Resources and Pollution’,European Economics Review 35, 650–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellinga, N. and C. Withagen (1993),Some Notes on the Concept of a Green National Income, Department of Mathematics and Computing Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, mimeo.

  • Verbruggen, H. and O. Kuik (1991), ‘Indicators of Sustainable Development: An Overview’, in O. Kuik and H. Verbruggen, eds., InSearch of Indicators of Sustainable Development, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Den Butter, F.A.G., Verbruggen, H. Measuring the trade-off between economic growth and a clean environment. Environ Resource Econ 4, 187–208 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00692203

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00692203

Key words

Navigation