Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal combination of pollution prevention and abatement policies: The case of agricultural drainage

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The adoption of pollution prevention and abatement practices is examined in the context of a model of exhaustible resource use with a backstop technology. For the sake of concreteness, the paper focuses on the problem of water-logging caused by the subsurface accumulation of agricultural drainwater. In modelling this problem, a region's underground capacity to store drainwater is considered an exhaustible resource, while the installation of subsurface drainage is viewed as the corresponding backstop technology (or abatement practice). The exhaustible resource is typically over-exploited due to common access problems, which forces a suboptimally fast adoption of the abatement practice. Conservationist irrigation technologies, such as drip and sprinkler systems, tend to reduce drainwater generation, and their adoption could increase social welfare by delaying the abatement stage. Public policies are suggested to increase the adoption of such conservationist technologies. Data from California is used to illustrate the results and to demonstrate the efficacy of the model for policy purposes. While the setting used for the analysis in this paper is quite specific (i.e., water-logging), the same general modelling ideas may be applied to many other problems of environmental degradation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bryson, A. and Y. Ho (1975),Applied Optimal Control, Halsted Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, M., E. Lichtenberg and D. Zilberman (1990), ‘The Effects of Pricing Policies on Water Conservation, Drainage Reduction, and the Adoption of New Irrigation Technologies’,American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72, 883–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, M. and D. Zilberman (1986), ‘The Effects of Well Depth and Land Quality on the Choice of Irrigation Technology’,American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68, 798–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. and G. Heal (1974), ‘The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources’,Review of Economic Studies 41, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. and J. Stiglitz (1981), ‘Resource Depletion Under Technological Uncertainty’,Econometrica 49, 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinar, A., M. Campbell and D. Zilberman (1992), ‘Adoption of Improved Irrigation and Drainage Reduction Technologies under Limiting Environmental Conditions’,Environmental and Resource Economics 2, 373–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinar, A. and D. Zilberman, eds. (1991),The Economics and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture, Kluwer Academic Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farzin, H. (1986),Competition in the Market for an Exhaustible Resource, JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. M., E. Lichtenberg, D. Zilberman, D. Chapman, L. Dixon, G. Ellis and J. Hukkinen (1987), ‘Economic Implications of Regulating Agricultural Drainage to the San Joaquin River’, Technical Committee Report, state Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hexem, R. and E. Heady (1978),Water Production Functions and Irrigated Agriculture, Iowa University Press, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. (1931), ‘The Economics of Exhaustible Resources’,Journal of Political Economy 39, 137–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M. and N. Schwartz (1978), ‘Optimal Exhaustible Resource Depletion with Endogenous Technical Change’,Review of Economic Studies 45, 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, D., M. Moore, J. Hancher and M. Nieswiadomy (1989), ‘A Dynamic Model of Adaptation to Resource Depletion: Theory and an Application to Groundwater Mining’,Journal of Environmental Economic and Management 17, 66–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, K., B. Stevens, J. Letey and J. Oster (1990), ‘A Dynamic Optimization Model for Irrigation Investment and Management Under Limited Drainage Conditions’,Water Resources Research 26, 1335–1343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1976), ‘Towards a More General Theory of Regulation’,Journal of Law and Economics 19, 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausser, G. and P. Zusman (1991), ‘Organizational Failure and the Political Economy of Water Resources Management’, in A. Dinar and D. Zilberman, eds.,The Economics and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture, Kluwer Academic Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regev, U., H. Shalit and a. Gutierrez (1983), ‘On the Optimal Allocation of Pesticides with Increasing Resistance: The Case of the Alfalfa Weevil’,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 10, 86–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, F. and D. Zilberman (1991), ‘Government Policies to Improve Intertemporal Allocation of Water in Regions with Drainage Problems’, in A. Dinar and D. Zilberman, eds.,The Economics and Management of Water and Drainage in Agriculture, Kluwer Academic Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, M., C. Kling and J. Wilen (1993), ‘Water Markets and Water Quality’,American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75, 278–291.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors are grateful to Federico Castillo for research assistance; however, the responsibility for any errors or omissions in the paper rests solely with the authors. All correspondence relating to this manuscript should be addressed to Farhed Shah. Scientific Contribution No. 1583 of the Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shah, F., Zilberman, D. & Lichtenberg, E. Optimal combination of pollution prevention and abatement policies: The case of agricultural drainage. Environ Resource Econ 5, 29–49 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691908

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691908

Key words

Navigation