Summary
The mechanism of action of the pure antiestrogens ICI 164384 and ICI 182780 has been investigated. Both antagonists are steroidal antiestrogens with 7α-alkylamide side-chains. The antiestrogens reduce the cellular content of the estrogen receptor by reducing the half-life of the protein. A potential mechanism for this effect is suggested by the observation that the DNA binding activity of receptors which have been over-expressed in cells was inhibitedin vitro. The inhibitory activity of analogues of ICI 164384 with different side chain lengths correlates with their ability to function as pure antiestrogensin vivo. Since the estrogen binding site overlaps with residues involved in dimerisation, the antiestrogens are likely to bind to a similar site and may therefore interfere with receptor dimerisation in the hormone binding domain by means of the 7α side-chain. We propose that the increased turnover of the receptor in the presence of ICI 164384 and ICI 182380 is a consequence of impaired dimerisation of the proteins.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bowler J, Lilley TJ, Pittam JD, Wakeling AE: Novel steroidal pure antiestrogens. Steroids 54:71–99, 1989
Wakeling AE, Bowler J: Biology and mode of action of pure antioestrogens. J Steroid Biochem 30:141–148, 1988
Wakeling AE, Dukes M, Bowler J: A potent specific pure antiestrogen with clinical potential. Cancer Res 51:3867–3873, 1991
Evans RM: The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science 240:889–895, 1988
Beato M: Gene regulation by steroid hormones. Cell 56:335–344, 1989
Green S, Chambon P: Nuclear receptors enhance our understanding of transcription regulation. Trends Genet 4:309–314, 1988
Gronemeyer H: Transcription activation by estrogen and progesterone receptors. Annu Rev Genet 25: 89–123, 1991
Parker MG: Steroid and related receptors. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 5:499–504, 1993
Greene GL, Sobel NB, King WJ, Jensen EV: Immunochemical studies of estrogen receptors. J Steroid Biochem 20:51–56, 1984
Catelli MG, Binart N, Jung TI, Renoir JM, Baulieu EE, Feramisco JR, Welch WJ: The common 90-kd protein component of non-transformed ‘8S’ steroid receptors is a heat-shock protein. EMBO J 4:3131–3135, 1985
Lesbeau M-C, Massol N, Herrick J, Faber LE, Renoir J-M, Radanyi C, Baulieu E-E: P59, an hsp90-binding protein. J Biol Chem 267:4281–4284, 1992
Kumar V, Chambon P: The estrogen receptor binds tightly to its responsive element as a ligand-induced homodimer. Cell 55:145–156, 1988
Kumar V, Green S, Stack G, Berry M, Jin JR, Chambon P: Functional domains of the human estrogen receptor. Cell 51:941–951, 1987
Lees JA, Fawell SE, Parker MG: Identification of two transactivation domains in the mouse oestrogen receptor. Nucleic Acids Res 17:5477–5488, 1989
Tora L, White J, Brou C, Tasset D, Webster N, Scheer E, Chambon P: The human estrogen receptor has two independent nonacidic transcriptional activation functions. Cell 59:477–487, 1989
Webster NJG, Green S, Jin JR, Chambon P: The hormone-binding domains of the estrogen and glucocorticoid receptors contain an inducible transcription activation function. Cell 54:199–207, 1988
Mitchell PJ, Tjian R: Transcriptional regulation in mammalian cells by sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. Science 245:371–378, 1989
Tsai SY, Tsai M-J, O'Malley BW: The steroid receptor superfamily: transactivators of gene expression.In: Parker MG (ed) Nuclear Hormone Receptors. Molecular Mechanisms, Cellular Functions, Clinical Abnormalities. Academic Press, London, 1991, pp 103–124
Fawell SE, Lees JA, White R, Parker MG: Characterization and colocalization of steroid binding and dimerization activities in the mouse estrogen receptor. Cell 60:953–962, 1990
Danielian PS, White R, Lees JA, Parker MG: Identification of a conserved region required for hormone dependent transcriptional activation by steroid hormone receptors. EMBO J 11:1025–1033, 1992
Harlow KW, Smith DN, Katzenellenbogen JA, Green GL, Katzenellenbogen BS: Identification of cysteine 530 as the covalent attachment site of an affinitylabelling estrogen (ketononestrol aziridine) and antiestrogen (tamoxifen aziridine) in the human estrogen receptor. J Biol Chem 164:17476–17485, 1989
Danielian PS, White R, Hoare SA, Fawell SE, Parker MG: Identification of residues in the estrogen receptor which confer differential sensitivity to estrogen and hydroxytamoxifen. Mol Endocrinol 7:232–240, 1993
Pakdel F, Katzenellenbogen BS: Human estrogen receptor mutants with altered estrogen and antiestrogen ligand discrimination. J Biol Chem 267:3429–3437, 1992
Arbuckle ND, Dauvois S, Parker MG: Effects of antioestrogens on the DNA binding activity of oestrogen receptors in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res 20:3839–3844, 1992
Fawell SE, White R, Hoare S, Sydenham M, Page M, Parker MG: Inhibition of estrogen receptor-DNA binding by the ‘pure’ antiestrogen ICI 164,384 appears to be mediated by impaired receptor dimerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:6883–6887, 1990
Sabbah M, Gouilleux F, Sola B, Redeuilh G, Baulieu EE: Structural differences between the hormone and antihormone estrogen receptor complexes bound to the hormone response element. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:390–394, 1991
Martinez E, Wahli W: Cooperative binding of estrogen receptor to imperfect estrogen-responsive DNA elements correlates with their synergistic hormonedependent enhancer activity. EMBO J 8:3781–3791, 1989
Pham TA, Elliston JF, Nawaz Z, McDonnell DP, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW: Antiestrogen can establish nonproductive receptor complexes and alter chromatin structure at target enhancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:3125–3129, 1991
Dauvois S, Danielian PS, White R, Parker MG: Antiestrogen ICI 164,384 reduces cellular estrogen receptor content by increasing its turnover. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:4037–4041, 1992
Gibson MK, Nemmers LA, Beckman Jr WC, Davis VL, Curtis SW, Korach KS: The mechanism of ICI 164,384 antiestrogenicity involves rapid loss of estrogen receptor in uterine tissue. Endocrinology 129:2000–2010, 1991
Guiochon-Mantel A, Lescop P, Christin-Maitre S, Loosfelt H, Perrot-Applanat M, Milgrom E: Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the progesterone receptor. EMBO J 10:3851–3859, 1991
Ylikomi T, Bocquel MT, Berry M, Gronemeyer H, Chambon P: Cooperation of proto-signals for nuclear accumulation of estrogen and progesterone receptors. EMBO J 11:1–14, 1992
Pasqualini JR, Giambiagi N, Gelly C, Chetrite G: Antiestrogen action in mammary cancer and in fetal cells. J Steroid Biochem Molec Biol 37:343–348, 1990
Jamil A, Croxtall JD, White JO: The effect of antioestrogens on cell growth and progesterone receptor concentration in human endometrial cancer cells (Ishikawa). J Mol Endocrinol 6:215–221, 1991
Shemshedini L, Knauthe R, Sassone-Corsi P, Pornon A, Gronemeyer H: Cell-specific inhibitory and stimulatory effects of Fos and Jun on transcription activation by nuclear receptors. EMBO J 10:3839–3849, 1991
Yang-Yen H-F, Chambard J-C, Sun Y-L, Smeal T, Schmidt TJ, Drouin J, Karin M: Transcriptional interference between c-Jun and the glucocorticoid receptor: mutual inhibition of DNA binding due to direct proteinprotein interaction. Cell 62:1205–1215, 1990
Jonat C, Rahmsdorf HJ, Park KK, Cato ACB, Gebel S, Ponta H, Herrlich P: Antitumor promotion and antiinflammation: down-modulation of AP-1 (Fos/Jun) activity by glucocorticoid hormone. Cell 62:1189–1204, 1990
Schüle R, Rangarajan P, Kliewer S, Ransone LJ, Bolado J, Yang N, Verma IM, Evans RM: Functional antagonism between oncoprotein c-Jun and the glucocorticoid receptor. Cell 62:1217–1226, 1990
Diamond MI, Miner JN, Yoshinaga SK, Yamamoto KR: Transcription factor interactions: selectors of positive or negative regulation from a single DNA element. Science 249:1266–1272, 1990
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parker, M.G. Action of “pure” antiestrogens in inhibiting estrogen receptor action. Breast Cancer Res Tr 26, 131–137 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00689686
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00689686