Skip to main content
Log in

Dose-dependent pharmacokinetics of rapamycin-28-N,N-dimethylglycinate in the mouse

  • Original Articles
  • Antinepolastic Agents, Pharmacokinetics, Preclinical Pharmacology
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rapamycin-28-N,N-dimethylglycinate methanesulfonate salt (RG), synthesized as a potential water-soluble prodrug to facilitate parenteral administration of the antineoplastic macrolide rapamycin (RA), is active against intracranially implanted human glioma in mice. Preclinical pharmacokinetic studies to evaluate the prodrug were conducted in male CD2F1 mice treated with 10, 25, 50 and 100 mg/kg doses of RG by rapid i.v. injection. The plasma concentration of RG decayed in a distinctly triphasic manner following treatment with the 100 mg/kg dose; however, prodrug disposition was apparent biexponential at each of the lower doses. RG exhibited dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, characterized by an increase in the total plasma clearance from 12.5 to 39.3 ml·min−1·kg−1 for dosage escalations in the range 10–50 mg/kg, while clearance values at doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg were similar. The terminal rate constants decreased linearly as the dose was increased from 10 to 100 mg/kg, eliciting an apparent prolongation of the biological half-life from 2.1 to 4.8 h. There was also a sequential increase in the steady state apparent volume of distribution from 1.73 to 8.75 l/kg. These observations are consistent with saturable binding of RG to plasma proteins while binding to tissue remains linear. Nevertheless, conversion to RA appeared to represent a prominent route of RG elimination. The molar plasma concentration of RA exceeded that of the prodrug within 30–90 min after i.v. treatment and declined very slowly thereafter, with plasma levels sustained between 0.1 and 10 μm for 48 h at each of the doses evaluated. Thus, RG effectively served as a slow release delivery system for RA, implying the possibility of maintaining therapeutic plasma levels of the drug from a more convenient dosing, regimen than a continuous infusion schedule. The present findings, coupled with the demonstrated in vivo activity of RG against human brain tumor models, warrant its continued development as a much needed chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of brain neoplasms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AUC:

area under plasma concentration-time curve between time zero and infinity

CL:

total plasma clearance

Az:

terminal phase elimination rate constant

MRT:

mean residence time

t1/2,z :

half-life of terminal disposition phase

Vz :

total body apparent volume of distribution

V1 :

central compartment apparent volume of distribution

Vss :

apparent volume of distribution at steady state

References

  1. Vezina C, Kudelski A, Sehgal SN (1975) Rapamycin (AY-22,989), a new antifungal antibiotic. I. Taxonomy of the producing streptomycete and isolation of the active principle. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 28:721

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sehgal SN, Baker H, Vezina C (1975) Rapamycin (AY-22,989), a new antifungal antibiotic. II. Fermentation, isolation and characterization. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 28:727

    Google Scholar 

  3. Findlay JA, Radics L (1980) On the chemistry and high field nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of rapamycin. Can J Chem 58:579

    Google Scholar 

  4. Swindells DC, White PS, Findlay JA (1978) The x-ray crystal structure of rapamycin, C51H79NO13. Can J Chem 58:2491

    Google Scholar 

  5. Martel RR, Klicius J, Galet S (1977) Inhibition of the immune response by rapamycin, a new antifungal antibiotic. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 55:48

    Google Scholar 

  6. Morris RE, Meiser BM (1989) Identification of a new pharmacologic action of an old compound. Med Sci Res 17:609

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chang JY, Sehgal SN (1991) Pharmacology of rapamycin: a new immunosuppressive agent. Br J Rheumatol 2:62

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chang JY, Sehgal SN, Bansbach CC (1991) FK-506 and rapamycin: novel pharmacological probes of the immune response. Trends Pharmacol Sci 12:218

    Google Scholar 

  9. Singh K, Sun S, Vezina C (1979) Rapamycin (AY-22,989), a new antifungal antibiotic. IV. Mechanism of action. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 32:630

    Google Scholar 

  10. Aszalos A, Robinson RS, Lemanski P, Berk B (1968). Trienine, an antitumor triene antibiotic. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 21:611

    Google Scholar 

  11. Douros J, Suffness M (1981) New natural products under development at the National Cancer Institute. Recent Results Cancer Res 76:153

    Google Scholar 

  12. Douros J, Suffness M (1981) New antitumor substances of natural origin. Cancer Treat Rev 8:63

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eng CP, Sehgal SN, Vezina C (1984) Activity of rapamycin (AY-22,989) against transplanted tumors. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 37:1231

    Google Scholar 

  14. Broome MG, Johnson RK, Silveira DM, Wodinksy I (1983) Biochemical and biological effects of the two unique antitumor antibiotics: rapamycin (NSC 226080) and macbecin II (NSC 330500) (abstract). Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 24:1271

    Google Scholar 

  15. Houchens DP, Overjera AA, Riblet SM, Slagel DE (1983) Human brain tumor xenografts in nude mice as a chemotherapy model. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 19:799

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baker H, Sidorowicz A, Sehgal SN, Vezina C (1978) Rapamycin (AY-22,989), a new antifungal antibiotic. III. In vitro and in vivo evaluation. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 31:539

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sehgal SN, Baker HH, Sidorowicz AM, Vezina C (1981) Injectable composition of rapamycin (abstract). Chem Abs 96:129797b

    Google Scholar 

  18. Deskin R, Pydlek D, Grumbein S, Greenspun K, Kastello M (1983) Preclinical single and five daily dose range-finding lethality and toxicity studies in Sprague-Dawley rats, and toxicity studies in beagle dogs administered rapamycin (NSC-226080) (abstract) Chem Abs 99:205773v

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stella VJ, Kennedy PE (1987) Water-soluble rapamycin prodrugs. US Pat No 4,650,803

  20. Gibaldi M, Perrier D (1982) Pharmacokineties, 2nd edn., Dekker, New York, p 409

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rowland M, Tucker G (1980) Symbols in pharmacokinetics. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 8:497

    Google Scholar 

  22. Benet LZ (1972) General treatment of linear mammillary models with elimination from any compartment as used in pharmacokinetics. J Pharm Sci 61:536

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lam I-C, Hung CT, Perrier DG (1985) Estimation of variance for harmonic mean half-lives. J Pharm Sci 74:229

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bundgaard H (1985) Design of prodrugs. Elsevier Science, New York, p 1, 135, 259

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Supko, J.G., Malspeis, L. Dose-dependent pharmacokinetics of rapamycin-28-N,N-dimethylglycinate in the mouse. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 33, 325–330 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00685908

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00685908

Keywords

Navigation