Skip to main content
Log in

Some aspects of seismic hazard assessment when comparing different approaches

  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Cornell and Gumbel approaches to probabilistic seismic hazard assessment have been applied in northeastern Italy to test the influence of various input parameters. Problems related to earthquake source geometry, seismicity descriptors, and attenuation of two ground-motion parameters of engineering interest (peak ground acceleration and macroseismic intensity) have been analyzed. The results seem to be very sensitive to this last variable (attenuation), while different methodologies can lead to very similar evaluations, if properly applied. Properly applied means that all the input parameters are prepared to satisfy the conditions of the chosen approach. In addition, the seismotectonic knowledge of the study region conditions the choice of approach to be applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Abbasi, J. N. and Fahmi, K. J.: 1991, Gempack: a Fortran-77 program for calculating Gumbel's first, third and mixture upper earthquake magnitude distributions employing maximum likelihood estimation,Computers & Geosciences 17, 271–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algermissen, S. T. and Perkins, D. M.: 1976a, A probabilistic estimate of maximum acceleration in rock in the contiguous United States, U.S. Geological Survey, Open File Report 76–416.

  • Algermissen, S. T., Perkins, D. M., Isherwood, W., Gordon, D., Reagor, G., and Howard, C.: 1976b, Seismic risk evaluation of the Balkan region, inProc. Seminar on Seismic Zoning Maps, Unesco, Skopje, pp. 172–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys, N. N. and Bommer, J. J.: 1991, The attenuation of ground accelerations in Europe,Earth. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 20, 1179–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbano, M. S., Egozcue, J. J., Garcia Fernandez, M., Kijko, A., Lapaine, J., Mayer-Rosa, D., Schenk, V., Schenkova, Z., Slejko, D., and Zonno, G.: 1989, Assessment of seismic hazard for the Sannio-Matese area of southern Italy - a summary,Natural Hazards 2, 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, B. and Perkins, D. M.: 1987,Seisrisk III: a computer program for seismic hazard estimation, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1772.

  • Berardi, R., Magri, L., and Mucciarelli, M.: 1990, Differenze di interpretazione di dati macrosismici da parte di diversi esperti e programmi per computer, in9° Conv. Naz. GNGTS. Riassunti delle Comunicazioni. ESA, Rome, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K. W.: 1989, The dependence of peak horizontal acceleration on magnitude, distance and site effects for small-earthquakes in California and Eastern North America,Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 79, 1311–1346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaruttini, C. and Siro, L.: 1981, The correlation of peak ground horizontal acceleration with magnitude, distance, and seismic intensity for Friuli and Ancona, Italy and the Alpide belt,Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 71, 1993–2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, C. A.: 1968, Engineering seismic risk analysis,Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 58, 1583–1606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drei, A., Grandori, G., Molina, C., Mulas, M., Perotti, F., and Petrini, V.: 1988, Individuazione delle principali aree sismogenetiche italiane e valutazione, per ciascuna area, della legge frequenza intensità epicentrale e della legge di attenuazione. Professional technical report, Politecnico Milano.

  • Epstein, B. and Lomnitz, C.: 1966, A model for the occurrence of large earthquakes,Nature 211, 954–956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgetti, F.: 1976, Isoseismal map of the May 6, 1976 Friuli earthquake,Boll. Geof. Teor. Appl. 18, 707–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, G., Perotti, F., and Tagliani, A.: 1987, On the attenuation of macroseismic intensity with epicentral distance, in A. S. Cakmak (ed.)Ground motion and Engineering Seismology, Developments in Geotechnical Engineering 44, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 581–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbel, E. J.: 1954,Statistical Theory of Extreme Value and Some Practical Applications. U.S. Dep. Commerce, Appl. Math. Ser. 3.

  • Gumbel, E. J.: 1958, Statistics of Extremes, Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, W. B. and Boore, D. M.: 1981, Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake,Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 71, 2011–2038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnik, V.: 1969,Seismicity of the European Area Vol. 1, D. Reidel Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopoff, L. and Kagan, Y.: 1977, Analysis of the theory of extremes as applied to earthquake problems,J. Geophys, Res. 82, 5647–5657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. W. and Trifunac, M. D.: 1985, Uniform risk spectra of strong earthquake ground motion: NEQRISK, Report No. CE85-05, Dept. of Civil Eng., Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makropoulos, K. C. and Burton, P. W.: 1985, Seismic hazard in Greece. II. Ground acceleration,Tectonophysics 117, 259–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makropoulos, K. C. and Burton. P. W.: 1986, HAZAN: a Fortran program to evaluate seismic hazard parameters using Gumbel's theory of extreme value statistics,Computer & Geosciences 12, 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, R. K.: 1976, Fortran computer program for seismic risk analysis, U,S. Geological Survey, Open File Report 76–67.

  • McGuire, R. K.: 1978, FRISK: computer program for seismic risk analysis using faults as earthquake sources, U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 78–1007.

  • Monachesi, G., Peruzza, L., Slejko, D., and Stucchi, M.: 1991, Seismic hazard assessment using intensity point data, in IBF (ed.)Soil Dynamics and Earth. Engin., Comp. Mech. Publ., Southampton, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OGS: 1987, Earthquake catalogue for the Eastern Alps region, OGS, Trieste, computer file.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papoulia, J. E. and Slejko, D.: 1989, Seismic hazard assessment in Friuli (NE Italy) with tentative fault geometry hypotheses, inProc. 4th Int. Symp. Analysis of Seismicity and Seismic Risk, Geoph. Inst. Czech. Ac. Sci., Prague, pp. 504–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papoulia, J. and Slejko, D.: 1992, Cautious neotectonic hypotheses for assessing the seismic hazard in northeastern Italy,Natural Hazards 5, 249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peronaci, M.: 1982, Intensity-magnitude relationships for Italian regions,Boll. Geof. Teor. Appl. 24, 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peruzza, L., Monachesi, G., Slejko, D., and Stucchi, M.: 1991, Valori osservati e valori calcolati per la stima della pericolosità sismica, in10° Conv. Naz. GNGTS, Riassunti delle Comunizazioni. ESA, Rome, pp. 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, C. F.: 1958,Elementary Seismology, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risk Engineering Inc.: 1987a,Seismic Hazard Methodology for the Central and Eastern United States. Volume 2: Programmer's Manual, Electric Power Research Institute, N.NP-4726-CCMP.

  • Risk Engineering Inc.: 1987b,Seismic Hazard Methodology for the Central and Eastern United States. Volume 3: User's Manual. Electric Power Research Institute, N.NP-4726-CCMP.

  • Sabetta, F. and Pugliese, A.: 1987, Attenuation of peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from Italian strong-motion records,Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 77, 1491–1513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slejko, D., Carulli, G. B., Nicolich, R., Rebez, A., Zanferrari, A., Cavallin, A., Doglioni, C., Carraro, F., Castaldini, D., Iliceto, V., Semenza, E., and Zanolla, C.: 1989, Seismotectonics of the eastern Southern-Alps: a review,Boll. Geof. Teor. Appl. 31, 109–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slejko, D. and Kijko, A.: 1991, Seismic hazard assessment for the main seismogenic zones in the Eastern Alps,Tectonophysics 191, 165–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slejko, D. and Viezzoli, D.: 1984, Scuotibilità del Friuli - Venezia Giulia utilizzando tecniche anisotropiche, inAtti 3° Conv. Naz. GNGTS, ESA, Rome, pp. 829–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sponheuer, W.: 1960, Berechnungverfahren mit schrittweiser Nährung, in W. Sponheuer (ed.),Methoden zur HerdtiefenBestimmung in der Makroseismik, Freiberger Forshungschefte C88, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 16–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peruzza, L., Slejko, D. Some aspects of seismic hazard assessment when comparing different approaches. Nat Hazards 7, 133–153 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00680427

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00680427

Key words

Navigation