Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Central and peripheral contrast sensitivity in amblyopia with varying field size

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to establish the extent of the amblyopic deficit at 0°, 10°, and 20° retinal eccentricity using contrast sensitivity measures for sine wave gratings subtending various field sizes. Contrast sensitivity functions were shown to vary with stimulus field size, retinal location and degree of amblyopia. Foveally, peak contrast sensitivity of amblyopic eyes increased markedly with increasing field size, to reach the same magnitude as that of the contralateral non-amblyopic eyes for large fields. Peripherally, peak contrast sensitivity remained lower in the amblyopic eyes for all field sizes examined. High spatial frequency cut-offs were reduced both centrally and peripherally with all field sizes in the amblyopic eyes. The effect of increasing field size on the cut-off acuity was found to be smaller than the effect on-peak contrast sensitivity.

The most significant conclusions drawn from the results are that: (1) The amblyopic deficit in terms of both peak contrast sensitivity and acuity isnot restricted to the central foveal region; and (2) amblyopic eyes benefit to a greater extent from increased stimulus field size than non-amblyopic eyes in terms of peak contrast sensitivity.

A model is proposed which suggests that the results obtained are due to fewer and/or less sensitive cortical neurons being driven by the amblyopic eye in humans with naturally occurring amblyopia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aulhorn E and Lichtenberg C (1972) Central and peripheral visual acuity of eyes suffering from strabismus amblyopia. In Orthoptics Proceedings of the Second International Orthoptics Congress. Ed. J Mein, JJM Bierlaagh and Tea BrumnelKanp-Dons Exerpta Medica Amsterdam: p. 153–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Avetisov ES (1978) Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity of the amblyopic eye as a function of the stimulated region of the retina. (Translation). Amer J Optom Phys Opt 56:465–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedell HE (1982) Symmetry of acuity profiles in esotropic amblyopic eyes. Human Neurobiol 1:221–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedell HE (1978) Retinal receptor orientation in amblyopic and non-amblyopic eyes assessed at several retinal locations using the psychophysical Stiles-Crawford function. PhD Dissertation, University of Florida

  • Bedell HE and Flom MC (1981) Monocular spatial distortion in strabismic amblyopia. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 20:263–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Burian HM (1967) The behavior of the amblyopic eye under reduced illumination and the theory of functional amblyopia. Docum Ophthal 23:189–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell FW and Green DG (1965) Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol (London) 181:576–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavasse BF (1939)Worth's Squint, 7th Ed. Philadelphia, Blakiston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowey A and Rolls ET (1974) Human cortical magnification factor and its relation to visual acuity. Exp Brain Res 21:447–454

    Google Scholar 

  • De Valois R, Albrecht DG and Thorell LG (1982) Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Res 22:545–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers HM and Blakemore C (1978) Physiological basis of anisometropic amblyopia. Science 201:264–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn JT (1967) Spatial summation in amblyopia. Arch Ophthal 78:470–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosvenor T (1957) The effect of duration and background luminance upon the brightness discrimination of the amblyope. Amer J Optom 31:639–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Gstalder RJ and Gree DG (1971) Laser interferometric acuity in amblyopia. J Ophthal 8:251–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemans KH and van der Wildt GJ (1979) The influence of the stimulus width on the contrast sensitivity function in amblyopia. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 18:842–847

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwerth RS (1982) Behavioral studies of amblyopia in monkeys. Amer J Optom Phys Opt 59:535–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess RF (1977) Assessment of stimulus field size for strabismic amblyopes. Amer J Optom Phys Opt 54:292–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess RF and Howell ER (1977) The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: Evidence for a two type classification. Vision Res 17:1049–1056

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess RF and Howell ER (1978) The influence of field size for a periodic stimulus in strabismic amblyopia. Vision Res 18:501–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess RF and Woo G (1978) Vision through cataracts. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 17: 428–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess RF and Jacobs RJ (1979) A preliminary report of acuity and contour interaction across the amblyope's visual field. Vision Res 19:1403–1408

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess RF (1980) A preliminary investigation of neural function and dysfunction in amblyopia, I–III. Vision Res 20:749–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess RF, Campbell FW and Zimmern R (1980) Differences in the neural basis of human amblyopias: The effect of mean luminance. Vision Res 20:295–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess R and Bradley A (1980) Contrast perception above threshold is only minimally impaired in human amblyopia. Nature 287:463–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel DH and Wiesel TN (1968) Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol (London) 195:215–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubel DH Wiesel TN and LeVay S (1975) Functional architecture of area 17 in normal and monocularly deprived macaque monkeys.Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 40:581–589

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda H and Wright MJ (1975) A possible neurophysiological basis for amblyopia. Br Orthopt J 32:2–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz LM (1982) Contrast sensitivity of the amblyopic eye in central and peripheral retina with variation of stimulus field size - Implications for its neural basis.Thesis, University of Houston

  • Kirschen DA and Flom MC (1978) Visual acuity at different retinal loci of eccentrically fixating functional amblyopes. Amer J Optom Physiol Opt 55:144–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink JJ, Bouman MA, Bueno de Mesquita AE and Siappendel S (1978) Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns, I–IV. J Opt Soc Amer 68:845–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawden MC, Hess RF and Campbell FW (1982) The discriminability of spatial phase relationships in amblyopia. Vision Res 22; 1005–1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawill T, Meur G and Howard CW (1973) Lateral inhibition in the central visual field of an amblyopic subject. Am J Ophthal 76:225–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi DM and Harwerth RS (1977) Spatio-temporal interactions in anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 16:90–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi DM, Harwerth RS, Pass AF and Venverloh J (1981) Edge sensitive mechanisms in humans with abnormal visual experience. Exp Brain Res 43:270–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi DM and Klein S (1982) Differences in vernier discrimination for gratings between strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 23: 398–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi DM, Klein SA and Aitsebaomo (1984) Detection and discrimination of the direction of motion in central and peripheral vision of normal and amblyopic observers. Vision Res 24:789–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Loshin DS and Levi DM (1983) Suprathreshold contrast perception in functional amblyopia. Docum Ophthal 55:213–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller EF (1955) Investigation of the nature and cause of impaired acuity in amblyopia. Amer J Optom 32: 10–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Pass AF and Levi DM (1982) Spatial processing of complex stimuli in the amblyopic. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 23:780–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovamo J and Virsu V (1979) An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor. Exp Brain Res 37: 495–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovamo J, Virsu V and Nasanen R (1978) Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral visioa Nature (London) 217:54–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor CM and Hallmark W (1978) Slow control of eye position in amblyopia. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 17:577–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Sireteanu R and Fronius M (1981) Naso-temporal asymmetries in human amblyopia: Consequence of long term interocular suppression. Vision Res 21:1055–1063

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J (1978) Normal and amblyopic contrast sensitivity functions in central and peripheral retinae. Invest Ophthal 17:746–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremain KE and Ikeda H (1982) Relationship between amblyopia, LGN cell ‘shrinkage’ and cortical ocular dominance in cats. Exp Brain Res 45:243–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Virsu V and Rovamo J (1979) Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity and the cortical magnification factor. Exp Brain Res 37:475–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Noorden GK (1977). Mechanisms of amblyopia. Adv Ophthal 34:93–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherill AB and Levitt H (1965) Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. Brit J Math Stat Psych 18:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Weymouth FW (1958) Visual sensory units and the minimum angle of resolution. Amer J Ophthal 46:102–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Worth CA and Chavasse FB (1950) Squint, its causes, pathology and treatment, 8th ed., ed. by T.K. Lyle. Philadelphia, Blackston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Houston, College of Optometry, Calhoun Blvd, 77004, Houston, TX, USA

    Laurence M. Katz, Dennis M. Levi & Harold E. Bedell

Authors
  1. Laurence M. Katz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dennis M. Levi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Harold E. Bedell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Supported in part by NEI grant R01EY01728 from the National Eye Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katz, L.M., Levi, D.M. & Bedell, H.E. Central and peripheral contrast sensitivity in amblyopia with varying field size. Doc Ophthalmol 58, 351–373 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00679799

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00679799

Key words

Search

Navigation