Skip to main content
Log in

On pair annihilation and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Discussion is given to the experimental facts that are associated with ‘pair annihilation’, as a real example, rather than a gedanken experiment, to illustrate the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. It is shown how the paradox disappears in a nonlinear relativistically covariant spinor field theory of this author, which takes thesingle interaction, rather thanmany free particles, as the elementary entity. In this theory there is no actual annihilation of matter. Rather, the observed facts that are conventionally interpreted as ‘pair annihilation’ arederived from an exact solution of the nonlinear field equations for the interacting pair in a particular deeply bound state. This solution reveals the observed facts, including the energy separation of 2m from the asymptotic state where the particles can be assumed to be (almost) free, and the prediction of two distinguishable currents whose phases are correlated by a 90° difference and are polarized in a common plane that is perpendicular to the direction of propagation of interaction with a detecting apparatus. The paradox disappears essentially because of the rejection by this theory (in principle and in the exact mathematical formalism) of anyphysical description in terms of truly uncoupled partial systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bohm, D. (1952).Physical Review,85, 166, 180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr, N. (1949). In:Albert Einstein—Philosopher Scientist, ed. Schlipp, P. A., pp. 201 and 666. The Library of Living Philosophers, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, G. F. (1963).S-Matrix Theory of Strong Interactions. W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P. A. M. (1963).Scientific American,208, No. 5, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P. A. M. (1966).Lectures on Quantum Field Theory. Belfer Graduate School of Science, Yeshiva University.

  • Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935).Physical Review,47, 777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furry, W. H. (1936).Physical Review,49, 393, 476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitier, W. (1944).The Quantum Theory of Radiation, 2nd edition, Section 16. Oxford.

  • Klemperer, O. (1934).Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. Mathematics and Physical Sciences,30, 347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, M. (1964).Nuovo cimento,31, 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, M. (1965).Nuovo cimento,37, 977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, M. and Schwebel, S. L. (1961).Nuovo cimento, Suppl.27, 197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, M. and Schwebel, S. L. (1962).Journal of Mathematics and Physics,3, 843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinger, J. (1966).Physical Review,152, 1219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinger, J. (1967).Physical Review,158, 1391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J. A. and Feynman, R. P. (1945).Review of Modern Physics,17, 157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. S. and Shaknov, I. (1950).Physical Review,77, 136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sachs, M. On pair annihilation and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Int J Theor Phys 1, 387–407 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00678679

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00678679

Keywords

Navigation