Abstract
Discussion is given to the experimental facts that are associated with ‘pair annihilation’, as a real example, rather than a gedanken experiment, to illustrate the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. It is shown how the paradox disappears in a nonlinear relativistically covariant spinor field theory of this author, which takes thesingle interaction, rather thanmany free particles, as the elementary entity. In this theory there is no actual annihilation of matter. Rather, the observed facts that are conventionally interpreted as ‘pair annihilation’ arederived from an exact solution of the nonlinear field equations for the interacting pair in a particular deeply bound state. This solution reveals the observed facts, including the energy separation of 2m from the asymptotic state where the particles can be assumed to be (almost) free, and the prediction of two distinguishable currents whose phases are correlated by a 90° difference and are polarized in a common plane that is perpendicular to the direction of propagation of interaction with a detecting apparatus. The paradox disappears essentially because of the rejection by this theory (in principle and in the exact mathematical formalism) of anyphysical description in terms of truly uncoupled partial systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bohm, D. (1952).Physical Review,85, 166, 180.
Bohr, N. (1949). In:Albert Einstein—Philosopher Scientist, ed. Schlipp, P. A., pp. 201 and 666. The Library of Living Philosophers, Inc., New York.
Chew, G. F. (1963).S-Matrix Theory of Strong Interactions. W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York.
Dirac, P. A. M. (1963).Scientific American,208, No. 5, 45.
Dirac, P. A. M. (1966).Lectures on Quantum Field Theory. Belfer Graduate School of Science, Yeshiva University.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. (1935).Physical Review,47, 777.
Furry, W. H. (1936).Physical Review,49, 393, 476.
Heitier, W. (1944).The Quantum Theory of Radiation, 2nd edition, Section 16. Oxford.
Klemperer, O. (1934).Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. Mathematics and Physical Sciences,30, 347.
Sachs, M. (1964).Nuovo cimento,31, 98.
Sachs, M. (1965).Nuovo cimento,37, 977.
Sachs, M. and Schwebel, S. L. (1961).Nuovo cimento, Suppl.27, 197.
Sachs, M. and Schwebel, S. L. (1962).Journal of Mathematics and Physics,3, 843.
Schwinger, J. (1966).Physical Review,152, 1219.
Schwinger, J. (1967).Physical Review,158, 1391.
Wheeler, J. A. and Feynman, R. P. (1945).Review of Modern Physics,17, 157.
Wu, C. S. and Shaknov, I. (1950).Physical Review,77, 136.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sachs, M. On pair annihilation and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Int J Theor Phys 1, 387–407 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00678679
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00678679