Skip to main content
Log in

Benthic macroinvertebrates in biological surveillance: Monte carlo significance tests on functional groups' responses to environmental gradients

  • Biological Assessment of Impact
  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Functional feeding groups are evaluated as summaries of benthic macroinvertebrate communities for the Upper La Trobe river system of Victoria, Australia. Two related questions are addressed. First, ‘what is the form of response of functional groups to environmental gradients?’ Second, ‘are observed group patterns significant insofar as they are unlikely to arise in randomly defined groups of taxa?’

Five functional feeding groups are evaluated relative to an environmental space defined at the structural, taxonomic level. A three-dimensional multidimensional scaling ordination of the sample sites, based upon this structural data, reveals a strong correlation with stream order in one direction in the space, and with particle size and benthic organic matter in another orthogonal direction. With the exception of filterers, the observed high correlations of functional group abundance with this space also would have occurred in randomly-defined groups. Scrapers, while not significant as a group in terms of linear response, are significant in terms of unimodal or clumped response to this environmental space. The utilization of such clumped responses in ordination space for biological surveillance programs is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belbin, L: 1988,PATN Reference Manual, CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biondini, M. E., Mielke Jr., P. W. and Berry, K. J.: 1988, ‘Data-Dependent Permutation Techniques for the Analysis of Ecological Data’,Veget. 75, 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, S. E.: 1986, ‘Spatial and Temporal Variation in the Macroinvertebrate Fauna of Streams of the Northern Jarrah Forest, Western Australia: Functional Organization’,Freshw. Biol. 16, 621–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. D. and Chang, J.: unpublished, ‘A General Index of Nonlinear Correlation and its Application to the Problem of Relating Physical and Psychological Dimensions’, Bell Telephone Laboratories.

  • Chessman, B. C.: 1982, ‘Algal and functional ecology’,LaTrobe Valley Water Resources Biological Studies Commission of Victoria Volume 3, State Electricity Commission of Victoria, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W.: 1974, ‘Structure and Function of Stream Ecosystems’,Biosc. 24, 631–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W.: 1973, ‘Trophic Relations of Aquatic Insects’,Ann. Rev. Entom. 18, 183–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith, D. P., Minchin, P. R. and Belbin, L.: 1987, ‘Compositional Dissimilarity as a Robust Measure of Ecological Distance’,Veget. 69, 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaufin, A. R.: 1973, ‘Use of Aquatic Invertebrates in the Assessment of Water Quality’,Biological Methods for the Assessment of Water Quality, American Society for Testing and Materials, Phil. Pa., pp. 96–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith, P.: 1983,Quantitative Plant Ecology, Oxford: Blackwell. 3rd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, H. A.: 1979, ‘Invertebrates as Indicators of River Water Quality’, in A. James and L. Evison (eds.),Biological Indicators of Water Quality, New York: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 2-1–2-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellawel, J. M.: 1978,Biological Surveillance of Rivers. A Biological Monitoring Handbook, Strevenage, England: Water Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herricks, E. E. and Cairns Jr., J.: 1982, ‘Biological Monitoring. Part I-Receiving System Methodology Based on Community Structure’,Water Res. 16, 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildrew, A. G. and Townsend, C. R.: 1987, ‘Organisation in Freshwater Benthic Communities’, in J. H. R. Gee and P. S. Giller (eds.),Organisation of Communities: Past and Present, British Ecological Society Symposium, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 347–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, T. J.: 1986, ‘Billabongs’, in P. De Deckker and W. D. Williams (eds.),Limnology in Australia, CSIRO, p. 457–470.

  • Holmes, R. T., Bonney Jr., R. E. and Pacala, S. W.: 1979, ‘Guild Structure of the Hubbard Brook Bird Community: A Multivariate Approach’,Ecol. 60, 512–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inger, R. F. and Colwell, R. K.: 1977, ‘Organization of Contiguous Communities of Amphibians and Reptiles in Thailand’,Ecol. Monogr. 47, 229–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. K. and Resh, V. H.: 1988, ‘Sequential Decision Plans in Monitoring Benthic Macroinvertebrates: Cost Savings, Classification Accuracy, and Development of Plans’,Can. J. Fish, Aquat. Sci. 45, 280–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, D. G.: 1970, ‘A Mathematical Approach to Seriation’,Philos. Trans R. Soc. Lond. A. 269, 125–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. and Wish, M.: 1978,Multidimensional Scaling, Sage Publications.

  • Kulczynski, S.: 1928, ‘Die Pflanzenassoziationen der Pieninen’,Bull. Int. Acad. Pol. Sci. Lett, Cl. Sci. Math. Nath. Ser. B. (suppl. 2), pp. 57–203.

  • Lake, P. S., Barmuta, L. A., Boulton, A. J., Campbell, I. C. and St. Clair, R. M.: 1985, ‘Australian Streams and Northern Hemisphere Strean Ecology: Comparisons and Problems’,Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 14, 61–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, P. S. and Barmuta, L. A.: 1986, ‘Stream Benthic Communities: Persistent Presumptions and Current Speculations’ in P. De Deckker and W. D. Williams (ed.),Limnology in Australia, CSIRO, pp. 263–276.

  • Landres, P. B. and MacMahon, J. A.: 1980, ‘Guilds and Community Organization: Analysis of an Oak Woodland Avifauna in Sonora, Mexico’,Auk 97, 351–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R., Smock, L. A. and Penrose, D. L.: 1980, ‘Use of Benthic Macroinvertebrates as Indicators of Environmental Quality’, in D. L. Worf (ed.),Biological Monitoring for Environmental Effects, D. C. Heath and Co.

  • Mac Nally, R. C. and Doolan, J. M.: 1986, ‘Patterns of Morphology and Behaviour in a Cicada Guild: A Neutral Model Analysis’,Aus. J. Ecol. 11, 279–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, R., Metzeling, L., Graesser, A. and Suter, P.: 1985, ‘The Organization of Macroinvertebrate Communities in the Major Tributaries of the LaTrobe River, Victoria, Australia’,Freshw. Biol. 15, 315–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, R. A., Buikema Jr., A. L., Cairns Jr., J. and Rodgers Jr., J. H.: 1982, ‘Biological Monitoring: Part IIA-Receiving System Functional Methods, Relationships and Indices’,Water Res. 16, 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzeling, L., Graesser, A., Suter, P. and Marchant, R.: 1984, ‘The Distribution of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates in the Upper Catchment of the Latrobe River, Victoria’,Occasional Papers from the Museum of Victoria 1, 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mielke, P. W., Berry, K. J. and Johnson, E. S.: 1976, ‘Multiresponse Permutation Procedures fora priori Classifications’,Comm. Statistics-Theory Meth. A5, 1409–1424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W., Petersen, R. C., Cummins, K. W., Bott, T. L., Sedell, J. R., Cushing, C. E. and Vannote, R. L.: 1983, ‘Interbiome Comparison of Stream Ecosystem Dynamics’,Ecol. Monogr. 53, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Petersen, R. C., Cushing, C. E., Bruns, D. A., Sedell, J. R. and Vannote, R. L.: 1985, ‘Developments in Stream Ecosystem Theory’,Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42, 1045–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive, J. H., Jackson, J. L., Bass, J., Holand, L. and Svisky, T.: 1988, ‘Benthic Macroinvertebrates as Indexes of Water Quality in the Upper Cuyahoga River’,Ohio J. Science 88, 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, S. J. and Edwards, R. W.: 1987, ‘The Ordination and Classification of Macroinvertebrate Assemblages in the Catchment of the River Wye in Relation to Environmental Factors’,Freshw. Biol. 17, 533–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. A. and Schaeffer, D. J.: 1987, ‘The Longitudinal Distribution of Riverine Benthos: A River Discontinuum?’,Hydrobiologia 148, 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou, E. C.: 1984, ‘Probing Multivariate Data with Random Skewers: A Preliminary to Direct Gradient Analysis’,Oikos 42, 161–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, D. J. and Perry, J. A.: 1986, ‘Gradients in the Distribution of Riverine Benthos’,Freshw. Biol. 16, 745–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statzner, B. and Higler, B.: 1985, ‘Questions and Comments on the River Continuum Concept’,Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42, 1038–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Wollenberg, A. L.: 1977, ‘Redundancy Analysis. An Alternative for Canonical Correlation Analysis’,Psychometrika 42, 207–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R. and Cushing, C. E.: 1980, ‘The River Continuum Concept’,Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 37, 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterbourn, M. J., Rounick, J. S. and Cowie, B.: 1981, ‘Are New Zealand Stream Ecosystems Really Different?’,N. z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 15, 321–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. F., Moss, D., Armitage, P. D. and Furse, M. T.: 1984, ‘A Preliminary Classification of Running-Water Sites in Great Britain Based upon Macro-Invertebrate Species and the Prediction of Community Type Using Environmental Data’,Freshw. Biol. 14, 221–256.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faith, D.P. Benthic macroinvertebrates in biological surveillance: Monte carlo significance tests on functional groups' responses to environmental gradients. Environ Monit Assess 14, 247–264 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00677920

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00677920

Keywords

Navigation