Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Constitution of objects in classical mechanics and in quantum mechanics

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The constitution of objects is discussed in classical mechanics and in quantum mechanics. The requirement of objectivity and the Galilei invariance of classical and quantum mechanics leads to the postulate of covariance which must be fulfilled by observable quantities. Objects are then considered as carriers of these covariant observables and turn out to be representations of the Galilei group. Individual systems can be defined in classical mechanics by their trajectories in phase space. However, in quantum mechanics the characterization of individuals can only be achieved approximately by means of unsharp observables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bohr, N. (1928).Nature,121, 580–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, P., Lahti, P., and Mittelstaedt, P. (1991).The Quantum Theory of Measurement, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, P., Grabowski, M., and Lahti, P. (n.d.). Operational quantum physics, in preparation.

  • Dalla Chiara, M. L., and Giuntini, R. (n.d.-a). The logics of orthoalgebra,Foundation of Physics, to appear.

  • Dalla Chiara, M. L., and Giuntini, R. (n.d.-b). Partial and unsharp quantum logics,Foundation of Physics, to appear.

  • Giuntini, R., and Greuling, H. (1989).Foundations of Physics,19, 931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauch, J. M. (1968).Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesiey, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1787).Kritik der reinen Vernunft.

  • Lahti, P. (1992). Galilei invariant quantum mechanics, Lecture notes, Köln.

  • Mach, E. (1926).Erkenntnis und Irrtum, 5th ed., J. A. Barth, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, G. (1963).The Mathematical Foundation of Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, P. (1987a).Sprache und Realität in der Modernen Physik, B. I. Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, P. (1987b). InSymposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds., World Scientific, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, P. (1994). InKant and Contemporary Epistemology, P. Parrini, ed., Kluwer, Dordrecht, p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa, M. (1984).Journal of Mathematical Physics,25, 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piron, C. (1976).Foundations of Quantum Physics, Addison-Wesiey, Reading, Massachusetts, pp. 93ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, H. (1994). Dissertation, University of Cologne.

  • Varadarajan, V. S. (1985).Geometry of Quantum Theory, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H. (1966).Philosophie der Mathematik und Naturwissenschaft, 3rd ed., Oldenburg, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Theoretische Physik der Universität zu Köln, Cologne, Germany

    Peter Mittelstaedt

Authors
  1. Peter Mittelstaedt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mittelstaedt, P. Constitution of objects in classical mechanics and in quantum mechanics. Int J Theor Phys 34, 1615–1626 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00676274

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00676274

Keywords

Search

Navigation