Skip to main content
Log in

Fuzzy set ideas in quantum logics

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fuzzy set theory language and ideas are used to express basic quantum logic notions. The possibility of replacing probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics by interpretation based on infinite-valued logics and fuzzy set theory is outlined. Short review of various structures encountered in the fuzzy set approach to quantum logics is given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beltrametti, E. G., and Cassinelli, G. (1981).The Logic of Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G., and von Neumann, J. (1936). The logic of quantum mechanics,Annals of Mathematics,37, 823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, E. (1974). Set-valued set-theory, Part I,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic,4, 619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, E. (1975). Set-valued set-theory, Part II,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic,5, 255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., and Prade, H. (1980).Fuzzy Sets and Systems-Theory and Applications, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvurečenskij, A., and Chovanec, F. (1988). Fuzzy quantum spaces and compatibility,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,27, 1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1958). Reichenbach's interpretation of quantum mechanics,Philosophical Studies,IX, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, R. (1976). Łukasiewicz logic and fuzzy set theory,International Journal of Man-Machine Studies,8, 315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, R. (1977). A non-classical logic for physics, in:Selected Papers on ŁukasiewiczSentential Calculi, R. Wojcicki, Ossolineum, Wrocław, ed. [shortened version published inStudio Logica,33, 397 (1974)].

  • Guz, W. (1984). Stochastic phase spaces, fuzzy sets, and statistical metric spaces,Foundations of Physics,14, 821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guz, W. (1985). Fuzzy σ-algebras of physics,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,24, 481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauch, J. M. (1968).Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, A. (1975).Introduction to the Theory of Fuzzy Subsets, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łukasiewicz, J. (1970).Selected Works, D. Reidel, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, G. W. (1963).Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maczyñski, M. J. (1973). The orthogonality postulate in axiomatic quantum mechanics,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,8, 353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maczyñski, M. J. (1974). Functional properties of quantum logics,International Journal of Theoretical Physics,11, 149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, V. (1980). An attempt at Goedel-Bernays-like axiomatization of fuzzy sets,Fuzzy Sets and Systems,3, 323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piasecki, K. (1985). Probability of fuzzy events defined as denumerable additivity measure,Fuzzy Sets and Systems,17, 271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piron, C. (1976).Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Benjamin, Reading, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, E. L. (1921). Introduction to a general theory of elementary propositions,American Journal of Mathematics,43, 163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pykacz, J. (1987a). Quantum logics as families of fuzzy subsets of the set of physical states, inPreprints of the Second IFSA Congress, Tokyo, Vol. 2, p. 437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pykacz, J. (1987b). Quantum logics and soft fuzzy probability spaces,Bulletin pour les Sous-Ensembles Flous et leurs Applications,32, 150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pykacz, J. (1988). Probability measures in the fuzzy set approach to quantum logics,Bulletin pour les Sous-Ensembles Flous et leurs Applications,37, 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pykacz, J. (1989). Fuzzy set description of physical systems and their dynamics,Bulletin pour les Sous-Ensembles Flous et leurs Applications,38, 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pykacz, J. (1990). Fuzzy quantum logics and the problem of connectives,Bulletin pour les Sous-Ensembles Flous et leurs Applications,43, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1944).Philosophic Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, University of California Press, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1966). The probabilistic argument for a non-classical logic of quantum mechanics,Philosophy of Science,33, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets,Information and Control,8, 338.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pykacz, J. Fuzzy set ideas in quantum logics. Int J Theor Phys 31, 1767–1783 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00671785

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00671785

Keywords

Navigation