Abstract
This paper reports on modeling of drifting snow phenomena. It comprises a review of the conditions for a correct simulation of snowdrifting in wind-tunnel or outdoor comparing requirements proposed by four scientists (Kind, 1975, 1985; Iversen, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1984; Anno, 1984, Tabler, 1980). Comparisons of these requirements were based on full-scale measurements, wind tunnel simulation, outdoor modeling with snow or sand.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anno, Y.: 1984, ‘Requirements for modeling a snowdrift’,Cold Regions Science and Technology 8, 241–252.
Anno, Y.: 1984, ‘Froude number paradoxes in the modeling of a snowdrift’,Cold Regions Science and Technology 10, 191–192.
Anno, Y.: 1984, ‘Applications of Anno's modeling conditions to outdoor modeling of snowdrifts’,Cold Regions Science and Technology 9, 179–181.
Bagnold, R. A.: 1941,The physics of blown and desert dunes, Methuen, London, 265 p.
Cemagref/Cete: 1982–1988,Essais comparatifs de barrières à neige, Annual reports.
Iversen, J. D.: 1979, ‘Drifting snow similitude - Drift deposit rate correlation’, unpublishedpaper presented at Fifth International Conference on Wind Engineering, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Iversen, J. D.: 1980, ‘Drifting snow similitude - Transport rate and roughness modeling’,Journal of Glaciology 26(94, 231–249.
Iversen, J. D.: 1981, ‘Comparison of wind-tunnel model and full-scale snow fence drift’,Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 8, 231–249.
Iversen, J. D.: 1982, ‘Small-scale modeling of drifting snow phenomena’,Wind tunnel Modeling for Civil Engineering Applications, Cambridge University Press, pp. 522–545.
Iversen, J. D.: 1984, ‘Comparison of snowdrift modeling criteria: commentary on “Application of Anno's modeling conditions to outdoor modeling of snowdrifts’,Cold Regions Science and Technology 9, 259–265.
Kind, J. D.: 1975, ‘A critical examination of the requirements for model simulation of wind induced erosion/deposition phenomena such as a snowdrifting’,Atmospheric Environment 10, 219–227.
Kind, J. D.: 1985,Snowdrifting: a review of modelling methods, Department of mechanical and aeronautical Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, K1S5B6.
Martinez, H. and Naaim, M.: 1992, Application du traitement d'images à la mesure du transport de la diffusion des particules dans un écoulement chargé, Congrès Société Hydrotechnique de France.
Martinez, H. and Naaim, M.: 1993, Détermination expérimentale et numérique du profil vertical de concentration dans un écoulement chargé, 11ième congrès français de mécanique, Lille-Villen euve d'Asq.
Naaim, F.: 1992,Transport de la neige par le vent: Modélisation physique en soufflerie diphasique, Memoire de DEA MMGE Université Joseph Fourrier Grenoble I.
Naaim, F.: 1990,Modélisation physique de la formation de congères au col d'Engayresque, Division Nivologie/Rapport d'Etudes.
Naaim, F. and Brugnot, G.: 1992,Transport de la neige par le vent: connaissances de base et recommandations, CEMAGREF de Grenoble.
Naaim, F. and Cure, J. P.: 1991,Hivernal practibility of a motorway in a context of plateau: case of A75 motorway, Université d'Ete Européenne sur les risques naturels/Chamonix.
Sarret, F.: 1993,Modélisation des congères à l'extérieur et en soufflerie, CEMAGREF/Université du Québec Memoire ENGEES.
Tabler, R. D.: 1980, ‘Self similarity of wind profiles in blowing snow allows outdoor modeling’,Journal of Glaciology 26, 421–434.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Naaim-Bouvet, F. Comparison of requirements for modeling snowdrift in the case of outdoor and wind tunnel experiments. Surv Geophys 16, 711–727 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00665750
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00665750