Skip to main content
Log in

Rent control: The British experience and policy response

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rent Control in Britain began in the First World War and has lasted, on and off, most of this century. There has been almost no new building for private rent since 1939. The private rented sector is small (8%), marginalized, delapidated, and unattractive.

The British Government is enacting new legislation to reform all areas of rented housing. Rents of new lettings will be freely agreed (i.e., at market levels) between landlord and tenant. But the tenant has security of tenure, subject to renegotiating a new rent. The absence of any important tax incentives or other subsidy was an obstacle to revival even with market rents. But the Business Expansion Scheme proposal in the March 1988 budget has created considerable interest among investors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldridge, T.Rent Control and Leasehold Enfranchisement. 8th ed. London: Oyez Publishers, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arden, A.The Private Tenants' Handbook. London: Allison and Busby, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission.Managing the Crisis in Council Housing. London: HMSO, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bone, M. and Mason, V.Empty Housing in England. London: HMSO, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, A.Utopia on Trial. London: Hilary Shipman, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Rent Acts.The Francis Report. Cmnd. 4609. London: HMSO, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daunton, M. J.A Property-Owning Democracy? Housing in Britain. Historical Handbooks. Faber and Faber, 1987.

  • Department of the Environment.Housing and Construction Statistics 1975–1985. London: HMSO, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • .Housing: the Government's Approach (the Housing White Paper). Cmnd. 214. London: HMSO, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • .Assured Tenancies; Monitoring Exercise 1987. London: DoE, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • .The Private Rented Sector: The Government's Legislative Proposals (mimeo). Consultative Paper. London: DoE., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Social Security.Housing Benefit Review: Report of the Review Team. Cmnd. 9520. London, HMSO, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edinburgh, HRH The Duke of.Inquiry into British Housing: Report and Evidence (two volumes). London: National Federation of Housing Associations, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A. W.House Prices and Land Prices in the South East-A Review. London: House Builders Federation, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Household Survey. London: HMSO, 1978.

  • Greater London Council (GLC).Private Tenants in London. The GLC Survey 1983–84. London: GLC, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, SirMilner.Report of the Committee on Housing in Greater London. Cmnd. 2605. London: HMSO, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmans, A. E.Housing Policy in Britain: A History. London: Croom Helm, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. H., Salt, J., and Wood, P. A.Housing and the Migration of Labour in England and Wales. Saxon House: Lexington Books, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeds Residential Property Association.A New Start for the Private Rented Sector. Leeds: Leeds Residential Property Association, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclennan, D.Housing Economics. London: Longman, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minford, P., Peel, M., and Ashton, P.The Housing Morass, Regulation, Immobility and Unemployment. Hobart Paperback 25. London: Institute of Economic Affairs, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Home Builders.Home Building after Tax Reform: a Builders Guide. Washington: National Association of Home Builders, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, A. “Housing Case Study: Difficult to Let.”Architects' Journal 176 (1982), 659–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, A. “Rescuing Unpopular Council Estates through Local Management—Trouble in Utopia.”Geographical Journal 150 (1984), 351–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, M.Lets Into Leases. London: Centre for Policy Studies, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, J. “Labour Migration, Housing and the Labour Market.” In: A. Evans and D. Eversley, eds.,The Inner City: Employment and Industry. London: Heinemann, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, J. “Labour Migration and Housing in the UK: An Overview.” In: C. Hamnett and J. Alden, eds.,Labour Markets and Housing. London: Hutchinson, in press.

  • Stahl, K. and Struyk, R. J.US and West German Housing Markets. Washington: The Urban Institute, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tingle, R.Housing and Mobility in Scotland. London: Aims of Industry, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, J., Bone, M., and Noble, I.The Privately Rented Sector in 1978. London: HMSO, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, J. E.Recent Private Lettings 1982–84. London: HMSO, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, C. M. E. and Kleinman, M. “Private Renting in London: Is It So Different?”Journal of Social Policy 16 (1986), 319–348.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Paper for conference on Rent Control: The International Experience, John Deutsch Institute Roundtable, Kingston, Ontario, 2 September 1987

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coleman, D. Rent control: The British experience and policy response. J Real Estate Finan Econ 1, 233–255 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00658919

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00658919

Keywords

Navigation